PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
MN-09/2021
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Manipur
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Manipur
(ii)
District :
Imphal East
(iii)
Forest Division :
Central Forest Division,Imphal
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
0.416
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Drinking Water
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Central Forest Division,Imphal
0.416
Reserved Forest
Total
0.416
Division 1. : Central Forest Division,Imphal
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Imphal East
0.416
Total
0.416
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
0.416
8
Eco 1
Total.
0.416
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Others
sahi
21
1
0
0
0
0
2
Schima Wallichii Chois
usoi
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
Others
Uyung
14
2
0
0
0
0
4
Cassia Fistula
Chahui
0
2
0
0
0
0
5
Others
Tumitla
1
0
0
0
0
0
6
Pine
Uchan
0
0
1
2
2
0
Total
37
5
1
2
2
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
47
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The area is prone to Erosion , as the area has less vegetation/tree cover .
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Indian Rock python, Barking deer etc are reported from the Reserved Forest
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
Yes
(a)Details of violation(s):
Illegal excavation of hill earth by an unknown per
(b) Period of Work done(year) :
NIL
(c) Area of forest land involved in violation (in ha.) :
0.18
S. No.
Name of person responsible for violation
Designation & Address of person responsible for violation
Action taken against the person responsible for violation
1
unknown person
unknown
The Beat Officer Heingang has filed a POR against an unknown person and an investigation has been initiated
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
No
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
1.83
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
0.832
Heingang Reserved Forest
Sadar East Range
3
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Compensatory Afforestation estimates
2
certificate of non-availability of land for compensatory afforestation
3
Allegation made by Lairembi Sintha Lup
4
POR filed against an unknown person vide POR No. POR/CFD/2021/4264 for illegal excavation of Hill Earth
5
Allegation made by UKAL
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Imphal East
66900
22000
22.65
16
27.286
15/10/2021
27.286
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Central Forest Division,Imphal
Central Forest Circle
DFO
Yes
One
28/08/2021
Central Forest Circle
CF
Yes
One
20/11/2021
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Central Forest Division,Imphal
Central Forest Circle
DFO
Recommended
As the area proposed for diversion is meant for the much needed water supply to rural masses in the nearby villages, the proposal for diversion of 0.416 Ha of forest land is recommended
Central Forest Circle
CF
Recommended
Considering the need for supply of drinking water to surrounding people, the proposal of the User Agency for diversion of 0.416 Hectare forest land in Comp. No.3, Khabam Block, Heingang RF under Central Forest Division is recommended with the following conditions a The User Agency shall demarcate the diverted area by erecting boundary pillars. b User Agency shall pay costs of extraction of the trees to be affected. c Protection walls/Retaining walls shall be constructed at the project costs at vulnerable points to prevent land slide and soil erosion.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Water being a basic necessity for life, proposed establishment of much needed infrastructures for water supply to cater to the inhabitants of Kairang Muslim village, under Jal Jeevan Mission of the Government is recommended for approval.
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Manipur
State Secretary
Recommended
17/06/2022
Recomended
State Govt. Officer
No Data
18.
Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.
Application No.
Total Amount (Rs.)
Recieved Amount (Rs.)
Transaction Date
Transaction ID
Bank Name
Mode of Payment
Demmand Generated By User Agency
Demmand Verified By Nodal Officer
Uploaded Demand Letter
FP/MN/WATER/144046/2021
WATER1440462021768
486,680.00
486,680.00
22/06/2022
PUNB617213824741
Union Bank Of India
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
17/06/2022
20/06/2022
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×