PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : MN-06/2016
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Manipur
 (i) State / Union Territory : Manipur  (ii) District : Churachandpur  (iii) Forest Division : Bishnupur Forest Division,Bishnupur,Southern Forest Division,Churachandpur  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 16.79  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Transmission Line
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Bishnupur Forest Division,Bishnupur5.71Protected Forest
2Southern Forest Division,Churachandpur11.08Protected Forest
Total 16.79
Division 1. : Bishnupur Forest Division,Bishnupur
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(in ha.)
NIL
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
15.4820Eco 1
20.2350Eco 1
Total. 5.71


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Schima Wallichii ChoisUsoi0230000
2OthersShahi0420000
3OthersTumitla090000
4Albzzia Spp.Khok0230000
5OthersUyung0023000
6Ficus ReligiosaSana Khongnang050000
Total 0 10223 00 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 125


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : Protection and Fuelwood and Fodder Working Circle
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : The project being linear in nature might not significantly affect the area as far as erosion is concerned.
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : No rare and endangered species found in the area
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 22.04
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
1111.5Langjingmanbi RFMoirang Ralige14    View file
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
 (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 NPV Calculation, Bishnupur Division
2 Certificate of Non availability of land for Compensatory Afforestation signed jointly by DC and DFO, Bishnupur
Division 2. : Southern Forest Division,Churachandpur
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Churachandpur16.79
Total16.79
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
111.0850Eco 1
Total. 11.08


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Albezzia LabbeckUil0551184900
2Albizia ProceraKhal03709510500
3Bauhinia ParvifloraChngthrao02811111000
4Cassia SiameaSahi-Kuhi0263455300
5Cedrela Febrifuga BlumeTairen039373900
6Emblica OfficianalisHeikru010157000
7Ficus RacemosaHeiyit07841000
8Pakia Biglandulosayongchak0191842800
9Pyrularia EdulisUyung(Quarcas)043845500
10Rhus Spp.Heimang0129194000
11Schima Wallichii ChoisUsoi0207364200
12Spondias Axillaris RoxbHeining0432212800
13Terminalia MyriocarpaTolhao094333100
14Duabanga SonneratioidesTal047281600
15Othersothers055431500
Total 0 17431227 5710 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 3541


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : Protection Working Circle
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : As the proposed transmission line goes in the form of a strip erosion may not be significant
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : No rare and endangered species found in the area
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): Yes
  Details of Protected Area and comments on the impact of Project on the ESZ : Keibul Lamjao National Park is about 3 km away from the nearest point of the project site. The project being stringing of transmision line, the impact of the project on the default ESZ may be negligible.
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 68.30
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
1122.16Cheklaphai RFSingngat Range3    View file
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
 (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 NPV Calculation

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Churachandpur457000415700228.264142.2201/10/2016142.220
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
Southern Forest Division,ChurachandpurSouthern Forest CircleDFOYesOne05/10/2016
Bishnupur Forest Division,BishnupurSouthern Forest CircleDFOYesOne27/09/2016
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
Bishnupur Forest Division,BishnupurSouthern Forest CircleDFO RecommendedAs the project is for welfare of people, the proposed diversion is recommended. The recommended area ie 5.71 ha corresponds to the portion of the forest area falling within the jurisdiction of Bishnupur Forest Division
Southern Forest Division,ChurachandpurSouthern Forest CircleDFO RecommendedThe district has acute shortages of power supply and the proposal for diversion of forest being in the form of narrow strip, which is unavoidable and to the barest minimum, is believed to have permissible impact to the forests. As such, the proposed construction of 132 KV transmission is recommended.
Southern Forest CircleCF RecommendedTransmission line is for distribution of power supply in the stateYes
Nodal Officer RecommendedAs the project proposal is a public utility project to be managed by the State Government the proposal is recommended.
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
ManipurState SecretaryRecommended04/05/2017 Recommended State Govt. OfficerNo Data
17. Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional OfficeRecommendation ByMoEF File No.Date of Stage-I ClearanceClearance Letter
ShillongRegional Office3-MNC 021/2017-SHI28/06/2018
23. Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.Date of Stage-II ClearanceProposal StatusClearance Letter
FP/MN/TRANS/20063/2016Approved In-PrincipleNo Data