PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : MN-020/2018
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Manipur
 (i) State / Union Territory : Manipur  (ii) District : Imphal East  (iii) Forest Division : Central Forest Division,Imphal  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 0.27  (v)

Category of the Proposal: School
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Central Forest Division,Imphal0.27unclassed forest
Total 0.27
Division 1. : Central Forest Division,Imphal
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Imphal East0.27
Total0.27
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
10.2740Eco 1
Total. 0.27


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Gmelin ArboreaWang030000
2Schima Wallichii ChoisUsoi040000
3Michelia ChampakaLeihao010000
4Mangifera IndicaHeinou020000
5Emblica OfficianalisHeikru020000
Total 0 120 00 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 12


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : NIL
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : The site is to be developed by cutting the hill earth which are generally very steep. Therefore, during the monsoon, the freshly cut earth are prone to erosion and landslideproblem
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : The area has no reports of the presence of Schedule I species of animals
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: NA (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.: (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority:
Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
NIL

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Imphal East66922022.65327.28608/08/201924.310
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
Central Forest Division,ImphalCentral Forest CircleDFOYesOne07/08/2019
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
Central Forest Division,ImphalCentral Forest CircleDFO Recommended The school aims to provide quality education to students at far flung areas with a healthy environment for education free from pollution and distraction. User Agency has chosen the site as such spacious and open space is on following available in the area. The project proposal for diversion of 0.27 Ha forest land at Nongmaiching Unclassed Forest is recommended under the following term and condition 1 School,Hostel,Office building and Playgrond may be physically demarcated by consturcting pucca compound walls all around. 2 The area shall be demarcated by erecting sufficient number of RCC boundary pillar as decided by the Department. 3 Adequate protection measures shall be taken up to prevent forest fire during the dry seasons as directed by the Range Officer,Nongmaiching from time to time
Central Forest CircleCF RecommendedAs the area propose for diversion of 0.27 Ha forest land for construction of Global School of Human Resource at Nongmaiching Unclassed Forest is meant to provide quality education to students at far flung areas with a healthy environment for education free from pollution and distraction. Hence the proposal for diversion is recommendedYes