PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
MN-013/2018
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Manipur
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Manipur
(ii)
District :
Tamenglong
(iii)
Forest Division :
Western Forest Division,Tamenglong
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
1.113
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Road
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Western Forest Division,Tamenglong
1.113
Unclassed Forests
Total
1.113
Division 1. : Western Forest Division,Tamenglong
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Tamenglong
1.113
Total
1.113
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
1.113
40
Eco 1
Total.
1.113
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Mangifera Indica
Heinou
0
5
0
0
0
0
2
Schima Wallichii Chois
Usoi
0
5
1
0
0
1
3
Tectona Grandis
Teak
0
8
5
3
0
0
4
Gmelin Arborea
Wang
0
5
9
2
0
1
5
Tamarindus Indica
Mange
0
3
1
0
0
2
6
Mesua ferea
Nagesor
0
1
0
0
0
0
7
Duabanga Grandiflora
Tal
0
11
8
1
0
0
8
Artocarpus Heterophyllus
Theibong
0
0
0
0
1
0
9
Bamboo
bamboo
300
0
0
0
0
0
10
Bombax Ceiba
Tera
0
0
1
0
0
0
11
Terminalia Myriocarpa
Tolhao
0
3
5
0
0
0
12
Others
Yongchak
0
6
2
1
0
0
13
Others
Tumitla
0
2
0
0
1
0
14
Others
Cham
0
7
5
0
2
1
15
Others
Uyung
0
0
3
1
0
0
16
Others
Heining
0
1
0
0
0
0
17
Others
Heirikokthong
0
0
0
0
0
1
18
Others
Litchi
0
0
1
0
0
0
Total
300
57
41
8
4
6
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
416
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
Plantation Working Circle
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
Vulnerability to soil erosion is negligible.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Jungle Cat, Leopard Cat, Kalij Pheasant, Flying Squirrel etc.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
Yes
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
6.217
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
3
Community Forest
Nutigba Range
82
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Georeference map of CA
2
Calculation of NPV
3
Certificate of non-availability of non-forest land for CA
4
Survey of India Toposheet Map of CA
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Tamenglong
328202
304656
1575.179
8
3130.508
31/01/2019
2950.796
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Western Forest Division,Tamenglong
Western Forest Circle
DFO
Yes
Two
01/10/2018,05/01/2019
Western Forest Circle
CF
Yes
One
25/02/2019
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Western Forest Division,Tamenglong
Western Forest Circle
DFO
Recommended
The existing Irang Bridge is in a very bad condition which often leads to frequent blockage of passage of vehicles in the region, thereby obstructing the movement of goods and services in the State. The bridge on the Irang river serves as the connecting link between Imphal and various parts of the State like Tamenglong, Nungba etc. and also with the State of Assam through Jiribam and further to other North Eastern States. The area proposed for diversion of forest land is also barest minimum and will not affect much to the forests and wildlife of the area.
Western Forest Circle
CF
Recommended
The existing Irang Bridge is in a very bad condition which often leads to frequent blockage of passage of vehicles in the region, thereby obstructing the movement of goods and services in the State. The bridge on the Irang river serves as the connecting link between Imphal and various parts of the State like Tamenglong, Nungba etc. and also with the State of Assam through Jiribam and further to other North Eastern States. The area proposed for diversion of forest land is also barest minimum and will not affect much to the forests and wildlife of the area.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
The existing Irang Bridge is in a very bad condition which often leads to frequent blockage of passage of vehicles in the region, thereby obstructing the movement of goods and services in the State. The bridge on the Irang river serves as the connecting link between Imphal and various parts of the State like Tamenglong, Nungba etc. and also with the State of Assam through Jiribam and further to other North Eastern States. The area proposed for diversion of forest land is also barest minimum and will not affect much to the forests and wildlife of the area.
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Manipur
State Secretary
Recommended
20/06/2019
State Govt. Officer
No Data
17.
Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional Office
Recommendation By
MoEF File No.
Date of Stage-I Clearance
Clearance Letter
Shillong
Regional Office
3-MN B 057/2020-SHI
01/03/2021
18.
Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.
Application No.
Total Amount (Rs.)
Recieved Amount (Rs.)
Transaction Date
Transaction ID
Bank Name
Mode of Payment
Demmand Generated By User Agency
Demmand Verified By Nodal Officer
Uploaded Demand Letter
FP/MN/ROAD/35012/2018
ROAD350122018282
1,460,500.00
1,460,500.00
Union Bank Of India
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
20/07/2021
22/07/2021
23.
Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.
Date of Stage-II Clearance
Proposal Status
Clearance Letter
FP/MN/ROAD/35012/2018
Approved In-Principle
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×