PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
MN-014/2018
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Manipur
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Manipur
(ii)
District :
Ukhrul
(iii)
Forest Division :
Eastern Forest Division,Ukhrul
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
133.882
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Road
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Eastern Forest Division,Ukhrul
133.88
Unclassed Forests
Total
133.88
Division 1. : Eastern Forest Division,Ukhrul
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Ukhrul
133.882
Total
133.882
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
0.4
70
Eco 1
2
18.74
45
Eco 1
3
114.73
8
Eco 1
Total.
133.87
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Alnus Nepalensis
Pareng
2392
11719
1894
0
0
0
2
Others
Cherry
0
1914
1995
0
0
0
3
Juglan Regia
Heijuka
0
937
5915
0
0
0
4
Pine
Uchan
1435
1435
121
0
0
0
5
Others
Uyung
0
3349
0
0
0
0
6
Leucosceptrum Canum Sm.
Leihao
234
1426
1171
0
0
0
7
Others
Ucham
2392
2870
2353
0
0
0
8
Schima Wallichii Chois
Usoi
0
0
1171
0
0
0
9
Others
7147
7596
4786
0
0
0
Total
13600
31246
19406
0
0
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
64252
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The roads are to be expanded by cutting the hill earth which are generally very step. Therefore, during the monsoon, the freshly cut earth are prone to erosion and landslide. Prope
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
The area has no reports of the presence of Schedule I species of animals
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
Yes
Details of Protected Area and comments on the impact of Project on the ESZ :
The road passes through the eco-sensitive zone within 10km radius of the proposed Shirui National Park. However, the impact of the project on the eco-sensitive zone would be minimal as there are existing road which need to be improved by diverting small area.
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
Yes
Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas :
The road passes through the eco-sensitive zone within 10km radius of the proposed Shirui National Park. Animal corridor is essential at some points as there are reports of animals such as squirrels, wildcat etch crossing the road.
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
531.59
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
100
Unclassed Forest
Jessami Range
13
View file
2
2
50
Unclassed Forest
Jessami Range
27
View file
3
3
50
Unclassed Forest
Jessami Range
29
View file
4
4
18
Unclassed Forest
Jessami Range
29
View file
5
5
50
Unclassed Forest
UKhrul Range
8
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority:
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Land suitability
2
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Ukhrul
4554
3582
744.4
5
1469.4
27/03/2019
1329.4
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Eastern Forest Division,Ukhrul
Eastern Forest Circle
DFO
Yes
One
10/01/2019
Eastern Forest Circle
CF
Yes
One
21/05/2019
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Eastern Forest Division,Ukhrul
Eastern Forest Circle
DFO
Recommended
The Widening and improvement of Yaingangpokpi Nagaland Road Section of NH 202 into two laning with paved shoulder of 48.273 km from Hungpung to Longpi Kachui of 94.612 km in the State of Manipur on EPC Mode by NHIDCL would improve the socio economic profile of the people in an around Ukhrul District. The proposed area is unavoidable and barest minimum.
Eastern Forest Circle
CF
Recommended
The road will alleviate the current unsafe conditions of the Highway. It will improve the socio economic condition of people of the District and also boosting tourism in the region. It will also generate employment opportunity in the District.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
The road will alleviate the current unsafe conditions of the Highway. It will improve the socio economic condition of people of the District and also boosting tourism in the region. It will also generate employment opportunity in the District.
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Manipur
State Secretary
Recommended
11/12/2020
improve the socio economic condition of people of the District and also boosting tourism in the region. It will also generate employment opportunity in the District. Therefore, it is recommended.
State Govt. Officer
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×