PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
MN-09/2018
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Manipur
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Manipur
(ii)
District :
Imphal East,Ukhrul,Senapati
(iii)
Forest Division :
Central Forest Division,Imphal,Eastern Forest Division,Ukhrul,Thoubal Forest Division
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
149.708
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Road
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Eastern Forest Division,Ukhrul
128.8471
Unclassed Forests
2
Thoubal Forest Division
8.1702
Unclassed Forests
3
Central Forest Division,Imphal
12.6907
Reserved Forest
Total
149.708
Division 1. : Central Forest Division,Imphal
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Imphal East
0.463
2
Senapati
12.2269
Total
12.6899
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
12.6907
10
Eco 1
Total.
12.6907
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Gmelina Arborea
Wang
1190
968
746
95
0
0
2
Others
Uyung (Quercus serrata)
1174
301
32
0
0
0
3
Others
Pungdol (Psidium Guava)
16
0
0
0
0
0
4
Others
Tairel (Toona ciliata)
63
62
16
0
0
0
5
Tectona Grandis
Chingsoo
111
143
32
0
0
0
6
Others
Yongchak (Parkia sp)
0
63
16
0
0
0
7
Artocarpus Heterophyllus
Theibong (Artocarpus integrifolia)
0
0
16
0
0
0
8
Eucalyptus
Nasik
32
0
0
0
0
0
9
Albizia Procera
Khal
32
95
16
32
0
0
10
Albzzia Spp.
Khok (Albizzia stipulata)
16
48
48
0
0
0
11
Others
Uningthou (Phoebe hainesiana)
143
48
32
0
0
0
12
Others
Samjenhei
0
16
0
0
0
0
13
Others
Shamba (Oroxylum indicum)
16
0
0
0
0
0
14
Others
Limphop (Engelhardtia spicata)
16
63
0
0
0
0
15
Others
Lamok (Cordia dichotoma)
48
32
16
16
16
0
16
Bischofia Javanica
Uthum Naraobi
0
16
0
0
0
0
17
Others
Ashi Heibong (Ficus hispida)
16
32
48
0
0
0
18
embelica officinalis
Heikru
16
0
0
0
0
0
19
Others
Aakman (Lennea grandis)
0
16
0
0
0
0
20
Terminalia Myriocarpa
Tolhao
111
143
0
0
0
0
21
Albizzia lebbeck
Uil
0
63
16
16
0
0
22
Others
Zoidak
16
48
0
0
0
0
23
Others
Heirit (Ficus cunia)
32
79
0
0
0
0
24
Others
Heirikokthong (Artocarpus lakoocha)
0
16
0
0
0
0
25
Pine
Uchan (Pinus kesiya)
0
0
16
0
0
0
26
Others
Luwangkhoi (Albizia odoratissima)
0
16
0
0
0
0
27
Others
Ureirom (Bixa orellana)
0
32
0
0
0
0
28
Others
Chingthrao (Bauhinia cuminate)
0
16
0
0
0
0
29
Bombax Ceiba
Tera
0
16
0
0
0
0
Total
3048
2332
1050
159
16
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
6605
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
The area proposed for diversion falls within Plantation WC and Fuel-wood & Fodder WC
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The roads are to be expanded by cutting the hill earth which are generally very step. Therefore, during the monsoon, the freshly cut earth are prone to erosion and landslideproblem
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
50.3
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
The area has no reports of the presence of Schedule I species of animals
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
67.70
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
26
Chingkheiching RF
Sawombung Range
3
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
CA Scheme
2
The district profile of Senapati District cannot be uploaded on the portal and so a copy in PDF is furnished here
3
Distance from the Keibulamjao National Park
Division 2. : Eastern Forest Division,Ukhrul
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(in ha.)
NIL
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
27.196
60
Eco 1
2
101.644
10
Eco 1
Total.
128.84
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Albzzia Spp.
Khok
735
208
0
0
0
0
2
Alnus Nepalensis
Pareng
2045
5406
160
0
0
0
3
Tooni Cedrela
Tairel
640
1903
623
0
0
0
4
embelica officinalis
Heikhru
480
0
0
0
0
0
5
Others
Cherry
320
0
0
0
0
0
6
Juglan Regia
Heijuka
735
320
0
0
0
0
7
Ficus Tomentosa
0
1103
0
0
0
0
8
Pine
Uchan
415
3598
576
0
0
0
9
Others
Uyung
3628
4891
480
0
0
0
10
Schima Wallichii Chois
Usoi
640
1470
0
0
0
0
11
Pakia Biglandulosa
Yongchak
415
0
0
0
0
0
12
Tectona Grandis
Chingsu
0
415
0
0
0
0
13
Chukrasia Tabularis
Taimareng
1055
0
0
0
0
0
14
Terminalia Myriocarpa
Tolhao
943
1535
208
0
0
0
15
Gmelin Arborea
Wang
1695
1120
0
0
0
0
16
Others
Ucham
4605
7307
160
0
0
0
17
Schima Wallichii Chois
Usoi
2478
2734
480
0
0
0
18
Bauhinia Parviflora
Chingtharao
208
0
0
0
0
0
19
Others
1885
990
0
0
0
0
Total
22922
33000
2687
0
0
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
58609
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The roads are to be expanded by cutting the hill earth which are generally very step. Therefore, during the monsoon, the freshly cut earth are prone to erosion and landslide. Pro
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
The area has no reports of the presence of Schedule I species of animals
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
511.76
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
100
Unclassed Forest
UKhrul Range
5
View file
2
3
50
Unclassed Forest
Jessami Range
30
View file
3
4
50
Unclassed Forest
Jessami Range
30
View file
4
2
58
Unclassed Forest
Jessami Range
47, 48
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Shirui NP ecosensitive zone map
Division 3. : Thoubal Forest Division
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(in ha.)
NIL
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
8.1702
10
Eco 1
Total.
8.1702
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Gmelin Arborea
Wang
30
26
0
0
0
0
2
Terminalia Myriocarpa
Tolhao
5
50
0
0
0
0
3
Castanopsis Tribuloides
Thangji
31
11
15
0
0
0
4
Others
Uyung
74
6
2
0
0
0
5
Pine
Uchan
4
0
12
0
0
0
6
Others
Kurao angouba
5
0
10
0
0
0
7
Bombax Ceiba
Tera
6
0
2
0
0
0
8
Others
Khongnang
1
1
1
0
0
0
9
Others
Yongchak
0
2
0
0
0
0
10
Others
Tairel
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
Eucalyptus
3
0
0
0
0
0
12
Jacaranda Mimosifolia
0
0
1
0
0
0
13
Others
Tumitla
2
0
0
0
0
0
14
Others
Ucham
0
2
21
0
0
0
Total
161
98
64
0
0
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
323
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
Protection Working Circle
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The project envisages widening of road by cutting of hill earth which may make the area vulnerable to erosion during rainy season
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
No rare and endangered species found in the area
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
33.07
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
16.34
Waithou PF
Thoubal Range
P11 & P12
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
NPV calculation, Thoubal
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Senapati
327100
248300
234.73
4
469.46
16/04/2018
469.46
0
2
Imphal East
66900
22000
22.65
16
27.286
03/09/2019
27.286
0
3
Ukhrul
4544
3582
744.4
5
14694
31/03/2019
1329.4
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Eastern Forest Division,Ukhrul
Eastern Forest Circle
DFO
Yes
One
05/01/2019
Thoubal Forest Division
Central Forest Circle
DFO
Yes
One
05/08/2019
Central Forest Division,Imphal
Central Forest Circle
DFO
Yes
One
07/08/2019
Eastern Forest Circle
CF
Yes
One
18/05/2019
Central Forest Circle
CF
Yes
One
19/11/2019
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Eastern Forest Division,Ukhrul
Eastern Forest Circle
DFO
Recommended
The Widening and improvement of Yaingangpokpi Nagaland Road Section of NH 202 into two laning with paved shoulder of 0.000km from Laikot to Hungpung of 48.273 km in the State of Manipur on EPC Mode by NHIDCL would improve the socio economic profile of the people in an around Ukhrul District. The proposed area is unavoidable and barest minimum.
Thoubal Forest Division
Central Forest Circle
DFO
Recommended
The proposed Widening and improvement of Yaingangpokpi Nagaland road section of NH 102 into two laning with paved shoulder of 0.000 km from Laikot to Hungpung of 48.273 km in the State of Manipur on EPC Mode of NHIDCL would help in the upliftment of socio economic and livelihood condition of the people in the nearby villages. The proposed area for diversion is unavoidable and barest minimum. The project is thus recommended.
Central Forest Division,Imphal
Central Forest Circle
DFO
Recommended
The proposed widening of road shall provide the much needed better road connectivity between Imphal and Ukhrul District of Manipur and also beyond Ukhrul upto the State of Nagaland. The road will improve the economic growth of the hill district and subsequently escalate the standard of living of the people therein.
Eastern Forest Circle
CF
Recommended
The road will improve connectivity between District HQ and remote areas. It will remove the unsafe conditions in the highways. It will improve the socio economic conditions of the people and will also generate employment opportunity in the district.
Yes
Central Forest Circle
CF
Recommended
The proposal for widening and improvement of NH 202 into two laning is for improvement of road connectivity from Yaingangpokpi to Ukhrul, then to Nagaland. Proposed forest area for diversion is barest minimum and no alternate possible alignments are seen. The proposal for diversion of 12.6907 hectare forest land in Yaingangpokpi RF and Khamenlok Gwaltabi RF under Central Forest Division, Imphal is recommended subject to the following conditions a Disposal of excess earth, if any, shall be as per approved Muck Disposal Plan. If excess hill earth is to be transported outside the plan area, the same may be done as per provisions provided under the IFA 1927 and Manipur Forest Rules 1971. b Adequate measures to check soil erosion and land slide may be taken up at the project cost.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
The proposed Widening and improvement of Yaingangpokpi Nagaland road section of NH 102 into two laning with paved shoulder of 0.000 km from Laikot to Hungpung of 48.273 km in the State of Manipur on EPC Mode of NHIDCL would help in the upliftment of socio economic and livelihood condition of the people in the nearby villages. The proposed area for diversion is unavoidable and barest minimum. The project is thus recommended.
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Manipur
State Secretary
Recommended
08/12/2020
The proposed area for diversion is unavoidable and barest minimum. The project is thus recommended.
State Govt. Officer
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×