PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
MN-012/2016
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Manipur
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Manipur
(ii)
District :
Chandel
(iii)
Forest Division :
Tengnoupal Forest Division, Chandel
 (iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
96.027
 (v)
Category of the Proposal:
Road
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Tengnoupal Forest Division, Chandel
61.352
Unclassed Forests
2
Tengnoupal Forest Division, Chandel
34.675
Section-18 WLPA - 1972
Total
96.027
Division 1. : Tengnoupal Forest Division, Chandel
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(in ha.)
NIL
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
2.564
60
Eco 1
2
93.463
30
Eco 1
Total.
96.027
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Gannara
chingchorphone
0
195
0
0
0
0
2
Bischofia Javanica
Uthumnaraobi
0
106
0
0
0
0
3
Misc. Species
Ucham
0
438
0
0
0
0
4
Misc. Species
Wangthinam
0
246
0
0
0
0
5
Schima Wallichii Chois
Usoi
0
379
0
0
0
0
6
Syzigium Cumini
Shileima
0
117
0
0
0
0
7
Misc. Species
Uningthoumanbi
0
207
0
0
0
0
8
Cinnamomum Zeylanicum
Ushingsa
0
47
0
0
0
0
9
Albzzia Spp.
Khok
0
70
0
0
0
0
10
Misc. Species
Phaija
0
47
0
0
0
0
11
Alnus Nepalensis
Pareng
0
123
0
0
0
0
12
Misc. Species
Yongchak
0
47
0
0
0
0
13
Misc. Species
Heikreng
0
210
0
0
0
0
14
Misc. Species
Uyung
0
122
0
0
0
0
15
Albezzia Labbeck
Uil
0
198
0
0
0
0
16
Rhus Spp.
Heimang
0
332
0
0
0
0
17
Misc. Species
Sahi
0
582
0
0
0
0
18
Misc. Species
Heirukokthong
0
47
0
0
0
0
19
Misc. Species
Heirit
0
184
0
0
0
0
20
Misc. Species
Tumitla
0
148
0
0
0
0
21
embelica officinalis
Heikru
0
47
0
0
0
0
22
Terminalia Myriocarpa
Tolhao
0
47
0
0
0
0
23
Misc. Species
Akman
0
95
0
0
0
0
24
Misc. Species
Heiningmanbi
0
47
0
0
0
0
25
Albizia Procera
khal
0
184
0
0
0
0
26
Misc. Species
thangji
0
47
0
0
0
0
27
Misc. Species
Chingtairen
0
138
0
0
0
0
28
Duabanga Sonneratioides
Tal
0
136
0
0
0
0
29
Misc. Species
Uthambalmanbi
0
136
0
0
0
0
30
Misc. Species
Limphop
0
136
0
0
0
0
Total
0
4858
0
0
0
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
4858
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
The project area falls under protection, plantation, FFW working circle.
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The proposed project area have medium vulnerability to erosion during rainy season.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Hoolock gibbon, Kalis Pheasant, Oriental Hornbill, Himalayan Black Bear,etc.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
Yes
Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas :
Their will be minimum impact on these area as the proposed project is improvement of existing road, wildlife clearance will be taken from NWB.
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
Yes
Details of Protected Area and comments on the impact of Project on the ESZ :
Their will be minimum impact on these area as the proposed project is improvement of existing road, wildlife clearance will be taken from NWB.
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
Yes
Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas :
Their will be minimum impact on these area as the proposed project is improvement of existing road, wildlife clearance will be taken from NWB.
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
Yes
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
394.22
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
192
Others
Tengnoupal Raitge
32
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
NIL
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Chandel
331300
280700
24.54
1
50
08/10/2016
50
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Eastern Forest Circle
CF
Yes
One
09/11/2016
Tengnoupal Forest Division, Chandel
Eastern Forest Circle
DFO
Yes
Three
17/10/2016,27/10/2016,10/11/2016
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Tengnoupal Forest Division, Chandel
Eastern Forest Circle
DFO
Recommended
The proposed diverted area is widening of existing road
quetiapin ritalin
quetiapin und valdoxan
quetiapin wirkstoff
Eastern Forest Circle
CF
Recommended
TheKhongkhang to Moreh part of the project shall be useful in improving connectivity and will help improving the socio economy of the tribal villagers, hence, recommended.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Public Utility project
quetiapin ritalin
markenavntablet.site
quetiapin wirkstoff
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Manipur
State Secretary
Recommended
04/05/2017
Recommended
State Govt. Officer
No Data
17.
Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional Office
Recommendation By
MoEF File No.
Date of Stage-I Clearance
Clearance Letter
Shillong
Regional Office
3-MN C 018/2017-SHI
10/04/2018
18.
Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.
Application No.
Total Amount (Rs.)
Recieved Amount (Rs.)
Transaction Date
Transaction ID
Bank Name
Mode of Payment
Demmand Generated By User Agency
Demmand Verified By Nodal Officer
Uploaded Demand Letter
FP/MN/ROAD/20973/2016
ROAD209732016666
211,584,466.00
211,584,000.00
Corporation Bank
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
11/07/2018
13/07/2018
23.
Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.
Date of Stage-II Clearance
Proposal Status
Clearance Letter
FP/MN/ROAD/20973/2016
Approved In-Principle
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×