PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
MN-010/2016
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Manipur
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Manipur
(ii)
District :
Thoubal,Chandel
(iii)
Forest Division :
Thoubal Forest Division,Tengnoupal Forest Division, Chandel
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
50.51
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Road
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Tengnoupal Forest Division, Chandel
44.71
Unclassed Forests
2
Thoubal Forest Division
5.8
Protected Forest
Total
50.51
Division 1. : Tengnoupal Forest Division, Chandel
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Chandel
44.71
Total
44.71
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
41.79
30
Eco 1
2
2.92
40
Eco 1
Total.
44.71
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Misc. Species
Acacia
0
13
0
0
0
0
2
Misc. Species
Akman
0
54
0
0
0
0
3
Cassia Fistula
Chahui
0
13
0
0
0
0
4
Misc. Species
Ching Heitroi
0
22
4
0
0
0
5
Misc. Species
Feingou
0
65
0
0
0
0
6
Psidium Guajava
Pungdon
0
13
0
0
0
0
7
Emblica Officianalis
Heikru
0
101
0
0
0
0
8
Rhus Spp.
Heimang
0
150
0
0
0
0
9
Mangifera Indica
Heinou
0
13
0
0
0
0
10
Misc. Species
Heikreng
0
29
0
0
0
0
11
Misc. Species
Heiba
0
22
0
0
0
0
12
Misc. Species
Heirit
0
137
0
0
0
0
13
Misc. Species
Heirukokthong
0
4
0
0
0
0
14
Misc. Species
Khabi
0
36
0
0
0
0
15
Albzzia Spp.
Khok
0
468
25
0
0
0
16
Misc. Species
Khan
0
4
0
0
0
0
17
Misc. Species
Kurao
0
36
4
0
0
0
18
Misc. Species
larong
0
20
0
0
0
0
19
Misc. Species
Lakoi
0
42
0
0
0
0
20
Misc. Species
Limphop
0
25
0
0
0
0
21
Misc. Species
Ngang
0
20
0
0
0
0
22
Alnus Nepalensis
Pareng
0
319
7
0
0
0
23
Misc. Species
Pheija
0
38
0
0
0
0
24
Pine
Uchan
0
13
0
0
0
0
25
Misc. Species
Sahi
0
183
0
0
0
0
26
Misc. Species
Samba
0
13
0
0
0
0
27
Misc. Species
Sayom
0
86
0
0
0
0
28
Syzigium Cumini
Seileima
0
40
4
0
0
0
29
Misc. Species
Tarkeng
0
34
0
0
0
0
30
Terminalia Myriocarpa
Tolaho
0
11
0
0
0
0
31
Bombax Ceiba
Tera
0
0
13
0
0
0
32
Misc. Species
Thangji
0
13
0
0
0
0
33
Artocarpus Heterophyllus
Theibong
0
29
13
0
0
0
34
Misc. Species
Tumitla
0
103
0
0
0
0
35
Misc. Species
Ucham
0
389
4
0
0
0
36
Albezzia Labbeck
Uil
0
18
4
0
0
0
37
Misc. Species
ureirom
0
24
0
0
0
0
38
Cinnamomum Zeylanicum
Ushingsa
0
25
0
0
0
0
39
Schima Wallichii Chois
Usoi
0
142
0
0
0
0
40
Misc. Species
Uthambalmanbi
0
70
7
0
0
0
41
Bischofia Javanica
Uthumngaroubi
0
25
0
0
0
0
42
Misc. Species
Uyung
0
38
0
0
0
0
43
Misc. Species
wangthinam
0
90
50
0
0
0
Total
0
2990
135
0
0
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
3125
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
The project area falls under Plantation, protection & FF working Circle.
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The project area falls under medium vulnerability area during rainy season
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Kalis Pheasant, Himalayan Black Bear, Hollock Gibbon, Jungle Fowl. etc.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
Yes
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
207.41
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
101
Others
Tengnoupal Raitge
Khudei - 32
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
NIL
Division 2. : Thoubal Forest Division
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(in ha.)
NIL
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
5.8
30
Eco 1
Total.
5.8
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Calistemon Lanceolatus
Bottle Brush
0
0
2
0
0
0
2
Others
Cedrella toona
0
0
3
0
0
0
3
Delonix Regia
Gulmohar
0
0
2
0
0
0
4
Albzzia Spp.
Uil
0
0
0
2
0
0
5
Pine
Uchan
0
0
0
8
11
0
6
Schima Wallichii Chois
Wang
0
7
0
0
0
0
7
Eucalyptus
Nasik
0
0
0
2
0
0
8
Acacia Auricuiformis
Acacia
0
0
0
0
3
2
9
Pakia Biglandulosa
Yongchak
0
0
2
0
0
0
Total
0
7
9
12
14
2
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
44
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
the forest area proposed here for diversion fall under Biodiversity Working Circle and Plantation Working Circle.
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
As the project aims to widen the existing road, the diversion is question is linear in nature and hence there might not be significant change on soil erosion.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Nothing significant is reported
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
CA for the project proposal is proposed by DCF, Tengnoupal Forest Division entirely. Hence, no CA is proposed by DCF, Thoubal Forest Division for the same project.
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Thoubal
51400
10000
2.5142
3
5.0284
22/12/2016
5.0284
0
2
Chandel
331300
280700
24.54
1
50
05/10/2016
50
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Thoubal Forest Division
Central Forest Circle
DFO
Yes
One
07/12/2016
Central Forest Circle
CF
No
No Data
Eastern Forest Circle
CF
Yes
One
09/11/2016
Tengnoupal Forest Division, Chandel
Eastern Forest Circle
DFO
Yes
Two
20/10/2016,28/10/2016
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Tengnoupal Forest Division, Chandel
Eastern Forest Circle
DFO
Recommended
The proposed diverted area is widening of existing road
Thoubal Forest Division
Central Forest Circle
DFO
Recommended
The project will help in materializing the much need road communication between India and Myanmar
quetiapin ritalin
quetiapin und valdoxan
quetiapin wirkstoff
Central Forest Circle
CF
Recommended
The project will improve road connectivity of Imphal-Moreh Road and it will also develop the economy of the people.
Yes
Eastern Forest Circle
CF
Recommended
As the project will improved the connectivity of the state, and also improve the socio economic conditions of the tribal people the project is recommended.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Public utility project
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Manipur
State Secretary
Recommended
26/04/2017
Recommended.
State Govt. Officer
No Data
17.
Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional Office
Recommendation By
MoEF File No.
Date of Stage-I Clearance
Clearance Letter
Shillong
Regional Office
3-MN C 016/2017-SHI
14/12/2017
18.
Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.
Application No.
Total Amount (Rs.)
Recieved Amount (Rs.)
Transaction Date
Transaction ID
Bank Name
Mode of Payment
Demmand Generated By User Agency
Demmand Verified By Nodal Officer
Uploaded Demand Letter
FP/MN/ROAD/20852/2016
ROAD208522016219
58,223,500.00
58,223,500.00
30/01/2018
P18013078058188
Corporation Bank
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
18/12/2017
19/12/2017
19.
Uploaded Status of Land to be transferred to Forest Department under FCA (Mutation Details).
(i). Whether CA Land is mandatorily required in this Proposal :
Yes
(ii). Total Land identified for raising CA:
101
(iii). No. of Maintenance years:
8
(iv). Total No. of Patches/Parcel:
1
No. of patches :
1
Patch wise details
Patch No.
Shape of land identified for CA
Area of Patch/Parcel(in ha.)
1
Block(Polygon)
101
Status of CA Land so identified :
Forest Area
Site Name :
Lamkang Khunnou
Location Details :
Tengnoupal Range, Tengnoupal Forest Division, Chandel, Manipur
Uploaded GPS File :
Uploaded Scanned copy of Map :
Status of CA Land so identified
Name of Forest.
Legal Status of Forest Land
Tengnoupal Forest Division, Chandel
Other Forest Land
20.
Mutation Details Verified By Nodal Officer
Proposal No.
Verified Date
Mutation Letter
Remarks
FP/MN/ROAD/20852/2016
17 Sep 2018
No Data
Verified
21.
Compliance Details Submitted by User Agency
Proposal No.
Compliance Details submitted on(Date)
Uploaded Letter
FP/MN/ROAD/20852/2016
03 Oct 2018
22.
Compliance Details Verified by Nodal Officer
Proposal No.
Remarks
Verified Date
Uploaded Letter
FP/MN/ROAD/20852/2016
Compliance Report submitted
01 Oct 2021
23.
Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.
Date of Stage-II Clearance
Proposal Status
Clearance Letter
FP/MN/ROAD/20852/2016
23 Feb 2022
APPROVED
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×