PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
MN-06/2022
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Manipur
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Manipur
(ii)
District :
Imphal East,Imphal West
(iii)
Forest Division :
Central Forest Division,Imphal
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
12.9746
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Road
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Central Forest Division,Imphal
10.5893
Reserved Forest
2
Central Forest Division,Imphal
2.3853
Unclassed Forests
Total
12.9746
Division 1. : Central Forest Division,Imphal
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Imphal East
4.9644
2
Imphal West
8.0102
Total
12.9746
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
12.9746
45
Eco 1
Total.
12.9746
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Albzzia Spp.
khok
55
30
16
2
2
2
2
Others
Quercus dealbata (Sahi)
21
140
58
5
2
0
3
Pine
uchan
46
36
93
67
5
5
4
Emblica Officianalis
heikru
30
5
2
0
0
0
5
Others
Sahi saplings
15
0
0
0
0
0
6
Others
Celtis timorensis ( Heikreng)
7
2
1
0
0
1
7
Syzigium Cumini
jam
24
5
1
0
0
0
8
Others
Quercus serrata(Uyung )
7
11
7
7
0
0
9
Others
Uyung saplings
241
0
0
0
0
0
10
Others
Areca palm
8
0
0
0
0
0
11
Others
Ashoka saplings
43
0
0
0
0
0
12
Ficus Bengalensis
Banyan
0
0
1
0
0
2
13
Others
Beetle nut
1
6
0
0
0
0
14
Mimusops Elengi
bokul
1
2
0
0
0
0
15
Zizyphus Jujuba
boroi
2
3
0
1
0
0
16
Calistemon Lanceolatus
bottle brush
1
7
0
0
0
0
17
Others
Cassia javanica
1
13
3
0
0
0
18
Santalum Album
Cha chandan
134
69
0
0
0
0
19
Santalum Album
cha chandan
13
0
0
0
0
0
20
Others
Chaohui
5
1
0
0
0
0
21
Others
cherry
23
0
0
0
0
0
22
Others
chinese teak
2
2
1
0
0
0
23
Bauhinia Parviflora
Chingthrao
43
0
0
0
0
0
24
Others
chorphon
26
3
0
0
1
0
25
Others
Dalchini
20
0
0
0
0
0
26
Others
False rubber
0
5
0
0
0
0
27
Psidium Guajava
Guava
0
2
0
0
0
0
28
Delonix Regia
Gulmohor
0
2
12
20
0
1
29
Others
Haoshuk saplings
0
0
0
0
0
0
30
Others
Heibi
0
0
1
0
0
0
31
Artocarpus Heterophyllus
Theibong
32
7
7
2
1
1
32
Others
Heimang
21
2
0
0
0
0
33
Others
Heining
21
8
2
0
0
0
34
Mangifera Indica
Heinou
27
34
6
5
3
1
35
Others
Heinoujom
0
2
0
0
0
0
36
Others
Heirit
0
0
1
0
0
0
37
Others
Heitroi
0
0
0
0
1
0
38
Kunkudu
jarol
5
18
9
1
0
0
39
Others
karpoor
0
15
3
0
0
0
40
Others
Kherai
0
1
0
0
0
0
41
Greviia Robusta
kobilla
0
1
1
1
1
0
42
Erythrina Indica
kurao
20
1
1
3
0
0
43
Michelia Champaka
leihao
1
4
1
0
0
0
44
Tamarindus indicus
Mangge
0
1
0
0
1
0
45
Terminalia Arjuna
Mayokpha
44
0
0
0
0
0
46
Eucalyptus spp
Nasik
1
19
20
25
15
2
47
Azadirachta Indica
neem
1
3
0
1
0
0
48
Others
pheija
0
6
0
0
0
0
49
Others
Shileima
10
20
4
0
0
0
50
Others
Taimaireng
0
0
0
0
0
0
51
Others
tairen
16
23
11
2
0
0
52
Tectona Grandis
Teak
2
3
0
0
0
0
53
Others
tomal
0
3
0
0
0
0
54
Others
Tumitla (Litseae chinensis)
20
54
6
3
0
0
55
Others
U- thambal
0
2
0
0
0
0
56
Schima Wallichii Chois
usoi
36
32
5
11
2
1
57
Others
uthum naraobi
1
4
0
1
0
0
58
Gmelina Arborea
wang
50
31
17
1
2
0
59
Others
watangkhoi
39
0
0
0
0
0
60
Others
yongchak
4
7
0
0
0
0
61
Others
Zakarinda
0
0
1
0
0
0
Total
1120
645
291
158
36
16
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
2266
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
As the area is moderately dense forest, the area is less susceptible to erosion
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
As the diversion site constitutes the peripheral linear forest area near the existing road,no significant presence of wildlife reported.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
69.48
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
12.9746
Langol Extension Reserved Forest
Sadar West Range
5
View file
2
1
12.9746
Heingang Reserved Forest
Sadar East Range
2
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
District profile of Imphal East and Imphal West
2
Concept paper for development of Biodiversity park at Khongampat Awang Leikai ,Lamprai Chingjil
3
Net Present Value
4
Certificate of Non availability of land for CA , Imphal West
5
Certificate of Non availability of land for CA,Imphal East
6
CA ESTIMATES
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Imphal West
51900
5195
8.55
7
17.1
24/05/2022
10.228
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Central Forest Circle
CF
Yes
One
07/05/2022
Central Forest Division,Imphal
Central Forest Circle
DFO
Yes
One
13/04/2022
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Central Forest Division,Imphal
Central Forest Circle
DFO
Recommended
Imphal City is fast developing and there has been increase in traffic volume in the city especially in the recent past resulting in sluggish movement of vehicles. This has also resulted in vehicular accidents, rampant level of pollution, wastage of value time of commuters and fuel etc. In short, the overall economic activity in the city has slowed down due to traffic congestions. The proposed Imphal Ring Road Project is expected to address the above issue by diffusing the traffic movements and contribute in the overall development of Imphal City, more so in its endeavour to becoming a Smart City. Consequent upon the above, the proposed diversion of forest land for the Imphal Ring Road is thus recommended
Central Forest Circle
CF
Recommended
The Project proposal of the Public Works Department, Manipur for construction of a Ring Road around the Imphal City is to ensure quick access to important establishments in the City and Bypasses for all the 3 three NHs passing through the State and also to lessen traffic congestions in & around the Imphal city. The proposed forest land is unavoidable and barest minimum. The project proposal for diversion of 12.9746 Hectare Forest lands for construction of the Ring Road around the Imphal City by the PWD, Manipur is recommended with the following conditions a No additional forest land, other than what has been proposed, shall be asked for diversion by the User Agency for the said project. b The User Agency shall provide necessary funds for establishments of 2 Two Biodiversity parks.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
The Project proposal for “Construction of Greater Imphal Ring Road” around the Imphal City is intended to ensure quick access to the important establishments in the city and provide bypass for all the 3 three National Highways NH which will reduce traffic congestion in the Imphal City which is the capital of the State of Manipur. The project proposal may be approved.
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Manipur
State Secretary
Recommended
09/06/2022
Public Utility Project
State Govt. Officer
No Data
17.
Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional Office
Recommendation By
MoEF File No.
Date of Stage-I Clearance
Clearance Letter
Shillong
Regional Office
3-MNC 020/2022-SHI
01/12/2022
18.
Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.
Application No.
Total Amount (Rs.)
Recieved Amount (Rs.)
Transaction Date
Transaction ID
Bank Name
Mode of Payment
Demmand Generated By User Agency
Demmand Verified By Nodal Officer
Uploaded Demand Letter
FP/MN/ROAD/154280/2022
ROAD1542802022626
25,588,219.00
25,588,219.00
04/08/2023
63672
Union Bank Of India
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
02/08/2023
02/08/2023
FP/MN/ROAD/154280/2022
ROAD1542802022861
14,872,500.00
14,872,500.00
03/01/2024
SBINR52024010393738054
Union Bank Of India
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
29/12/2023
29/12/2023
19.
Uploaded Status of Land to be transferred to Forest Department under FCA (Mutation Details).
(i). Whether CA Land is mandatorily required in this Proposal :
Yes
(ii). Total Land identified for raising CA:
25.9492
(iii). No. of Maintenance years:
10
(iv). Total No. of Patches/Parcel:
2
No. of patches :
1
Patch wise details
Patch No.
Shape of land identified for CA
Area of Patch/Parcel(in ha.)
1
Block(Polygon)
12.9746
Status of CA Land so identified :
Forest Area
Site Name :
Langol
Location Details :
Sadar West Range, Compt 5
Uploaded GPS File :
Uploaded Scanned copy of Map :
Status of CA Land so identified
Name of Forest.
Legal Status of Forest Land
Langol Extension Reserved Forest
RF
No. of patches :
2
Patch wise details
Patch No.
Shape of land identified for CA
Area of Patch/Parcel(in ha.)
2
Block(Polygon)
12.9746
Status of CA Land so identified :
Forest Area
Site Name :
Heingang
Location Details :
Sadar East Range, Compt 2
Uploaded GPS File :
Uploaded Scanned copy of Map :
Status of CA Land so identified
Name of Forest.
Legal Status of Forest Land
Heingang Reserved Forest
RF
23.
Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.
Date of Stage-II Clearance
Proposal Status
Clearance Letter
FP/MN/ROAD/154280/2022
Approved In-Principle
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×