PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
MN-07/2015
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Manipur
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Manipur
(ii)
District :
Imphal West,Senapati,Tamenglong
(iii)
Forest Division :
Northern Forest Division,Ktuigpokpi,Western Forest Division,Tamenglong
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
91.43
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Road
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Western Forest Division,Tamenglong
49.82
Protected Forest
2
Western Forest Division,Tamenglong
31.05
Unclassed Forests
3
Northern Forest Division,Ktuigpokpi
4.04
Reserved Forest
4
Northern Forest Division,Ktuigpokpi
6.52
Protected Forest
Total
91.43
Division 1. : Northern Forest Division,Ktuigpokpi
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Senapati
10.56
Total
10.56
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
10.56
10
Eco 1
Total.
10.56
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Bombax Ceiba
Tera
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
Schima Wallichii Chois
Usoi
0
6
0
0
0
0
3
Misc. Species
Tairen,Oak,Heirit
0
4
0
0
0
0
Total
0
11
0
0
0
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
11
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
Plantation Working Circle
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
It is negligible
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
00
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
porcupine, deer, wild boar, flying sqirrel are found in forest land proposed for diversion of 10.56 ha.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
23.078
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
21.12
Kangchup RF
Motbung Range
9
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Recommendation file (PART- II) for NFD, Kangpokpi
2
Sketch Map for IKT Road
3
Physical and Financial targets for Compensatory Afforestation (CA)/Total CA financial outlay for 10 years(2 yrs for advance & creation and 8 years for maintenance) for Northern Forest Division, Kangpokpi
4
Physical and Financial targets for Compensatory Afforestation (CA)/Total CA financial outlay for 10 years(2 yrs for advance & creation and 8 years for maintenance) for Western Forest Division, Tamenglong
5
Net Present Value (NPV) for construction of Imphal-Kangchup-Tamenglong Road for Northern Forest Division, Kangpokpi
6
Certificate of Non-availability of land for Compensatory Afforestation under Northern Forest Division, Kangpokpi
7
Map showing CA site inside Kangchup RF under Northern Forest Division, Kangpokpi (construction of IKTR section)
Division 2. : Western Forest Division,Tamenglong
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Tamenglong
80.87
Total
80.87
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
80.87
40
Eco 1
Total.
80.87
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Gmelina Arborea
Wang
0
2
1
2
3
0
2
Mesua Ferra
Nagesor
0
3
3
0
1
1
3
Schima Wallichii Chois
Usoi
0
4
3
1
0
0
4
Duabanga Sonneratioides
Tal
0
5
5
3
0
1
5
Teak
Teak
0
3
1
2
1
0
6
Misc. Species
Cham, Tumitla
0
14
3
0
1
2
Total
0
31
16
8
6
4
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
65
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
Mostly within Plantation Working Circle
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
Vulnerability to soil erosion is negligible
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
4
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Hog deer,sambar, wild dog, jungle cat, small indian mongoose, Squirrel, indian porcupine,wild pig,python, snakes etc.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
176.733
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
2
50
Bhalok community forest
Tamenglong Range
5 & 6
View file
2
3
31.74
Sonpram community forest
Tamenglong Range
28
View file
3
4
50
Lamlaba community forest
Tamenglong Range
30
View file
4
1
30
Kangchup-Leimakhong- Irang PF
Noncy Range
63
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Map showing CA site at Langkhong village under Western Forest Division, Tamenglong (construction of IKTR section)
2
Certificate of Non-availability of land for Compensatory Afforestation under Western Forest Division, Tamenglong
3
Map showing CA site at Lamlaba under Western Forest Division, Tamenglong (construction of IKTR section)
4
Map showing CA site at Sonpram under Western Forest Division, Tamenglong (construction of IKTR section)
5
Map showing CA site at Bhalok under Western Forest Division, Tamenglong (construction of IKTR section)
6
Sketch map IKTR, WFD, Tamenglong
7
Net Present Value (NPV)for IKTR section, WFD, Tamenglong
8
Recomendation file Part- II, WFD
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Senapati
327100
217300
117.365
4
234.73
18/03/2016
234.73
0
2
Tamenglong
328202
304656
1286.723
5
2781.596
18/03/2016
2781.596
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Northern Forest Division,Ktuigpokpi
Northern Forest Circle
DFO
Yes
One
01/03/2016
Northern Forest Circle
CF
Yes
One
11/04/2016
Western Forest Division,Tamenglong
Western Forest Circle
DFO
Yes
One
01/03/2016
Western Forest Circle
CF
Yes
One
09/04/2016
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Western Forest Division,Tamenglong
Western Forest Circle
DFO
Recommended
Construction of Imphal-Kangchup-Tamenglong (IKT) Road touches 17 different tribal villages in addition to several localities and towns of Imphal West District of Manipur State with minimum shortest distance of 103.02 km. It will give immense benefit to the people of the State in general and tribal villages of Tamenglong and Senapati District in particular. It will provide easy and shortest possible distance in transportation of different essential commodities, goods and products within a short t
Northern Forest Division,Ktuigpokpi
Northern Forest Circle
DFO
Recommended
Construction of Imphal-Kangchup-Tamenglong road will give immense benefit to the people of the state particularly the tribal villages of Tamenglong and Senapati District. It will be the backbone of the two district providing easy transportation of products and good. The proposed IKTR road will give easy access among different villagers of Tamenglong, Senapati and the valley region of the State. And thus strengthen the bond and brought about communal harmony in the region. It will also be the sho
quetiapin ritalin
markenavntablet.site
quetiapin wirkstoff
Western Forest Circle
CF
Recommended
The proposed road will be the shortest road between Imphal and Tamenglong with gentle gradient. Considering the importance of improving communication for the State particularly the local tribal people of the area, it is recommended for consideration.
Yes
Northern Forest Circle
CF
Recommended
Enhanced road connectivity will definitely benefit local communities and will help in boosting their economic growth and poverty reduction. It will help in the overall socio-economic development in the sub-region by providing easy accessibility to various services like markets, health facilities, school and work places etc. Hence it is Recommended.
quetiapin ritalin
quetiapin mod angst
quetiapin wirkstoff
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Manipur
State Secretary
Recommended
16/07/2016
State Govt. Officer
No Data
17.
Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional Office
Recommendation By
MoEF File No.
Date of Stage-I Clearance
Clearance Letter
Shillong
Regional Office
3 MN C 035/2016
06/10/2016
18.
Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.
Application No.
Total Amount (Rs.)
Recieved Amount (Rs.)
Transaction Date
Transaction ID
Bank Name
Mode of Payment
Demmand Generated By User Agency
Demmand Verified By Nodal Officer
Uploaded Demand Letter
FP/MN/ROAD/15031/2015
ROAD150312015803
8,930,000.00
8,930,000.00
30/01/2017
SBINR52017013000015919
Corporation Bank
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
21/01/2017
21/01/2017
FP/MN/ROAD/15031/2015
ROAD150312015627
83,789,480.00
83,789,480.00
04/04/2017
SBINR52017040400017164
Corporation Bank
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
30/03/2017
30/03/2017
23.
Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.
Date of Stage-II Clearance
Proposal Status
Clearance Letter
FP/MN/ROAD/15031/2015
Approved In-Principle
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×