PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
MN-012/2020
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Manipur
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Manipur
(ii)
District :
Kangpokpi
(iii)
Forest Division :
Noney forest division
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
5.345
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Quarrying
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Noney forest division
5.345
Unclassed Forests
Total
5.345
Division 1. : Noney forest division
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Kangpokpi
5.345
2
Kangpokpi
5.345
Total
10.69
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
5.345
40
Eco 1
Total.
5.345
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Schima Wallichii Chois
usoi
0
7
1
0
0
0
2
Others
Tumitla
0
12
0
0
0
0
3
Others
Uyung
0
0
3
0
0
0
4
Erythrina Indica
Kurao Angangba
0
12
0
0
0
0
5
Bombax Ceiba
Tera
0
9
1
0
0
0
Total
0
40
5
0
0
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
45
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
plantation working Circle
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The area selected for quarrying is a stable site
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
45
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Monitor lizard, Leopard cat and other reptiles
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
22.159
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
2
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Kangpokpi
113411.28
95684.17
66.259
5
132.5
06/07/2020
132.5
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Noney forest division
Western Forest Circle
DFO
Yes
One
20/06/2020
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Noney forest division
Western Forest Circle
DFO
Recommended
The project is recommended for approval for overall development of the state.
Western Forest Circle
CF
Recommended
The propose quarry will supply the construction materials for developmental work taken up in the state
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Insufficient Quarry sites has inconvenienced much development works and the contractors of projects tends to extract stones in unlawful manners. Officially approved quarry sites are required. The project proposal is recommended.
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Manipur
State Secretary
Recommended
08/07/2021
The project proposal is recommended in the interest of public.
State Govt. Officer
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×