PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : MN-08/2020
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Manipur
 (i) State / Union Territory : Manipur  (ii) District : Kangpokpi  (iii) Forest Division : Bishnupur Forest Division,Bishnupur  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 5  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Quarrying
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Bishnupur Forest Division,Bishnupur5Protected Forest
Total 5
Division 1. : Bishnupur Forest Division,Bishnupur
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Kangpokpi5
Total5
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
1520Eco 1
Total. 5


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Misc. SpeciesUsoi052000
2Misc. SpeciesHeirit035000
3Misc. SpeciesUyung0155000
4PineUchan020000
Total 0 2512 00 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 37


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : lantation and FF working Circle
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : Their is less vulnerability of forest area to erosion
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : no
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 14.552
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
1110Tairenpokpi Tamenglong PFBishnupur Range20    View file
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
 (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
NIL

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Kangpokpi113411.2895684.171.29952006/03/20212.5990
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
Bishnupur Forest Division,BishnupurSouthern Forest CircleDFOYesOne04/09/2020
 Southern Forest CircleCFNoNo Data
 Nodal OfficerNoNo Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
Bishnupur Forest Division,BishnupurSouthern Forest CircleDFO RecommendedThe project will help in the infrastructure development of the state.
Southern Forest CircleCF RecommendedThere has been a long and persistent demand for supply of natural construction materials for projects and schemes for the overall infrastructural development of the State. Since the project proposal involve minimum felling with little or no significant adverse impact on the existing eco system, recommendation is made.Yes
Nodal Officer RecommendedInsufficient quarry sites has inconvenienced much development works and the contractors or projects tends to extract stones in unlawful manners. Officially approved quarry sites are required. This is in public interest and it is recommended.
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
ManipurState SecretaryRecommended09/07/2021The project proposal is recommended in the public interestState Govt. OfficerNo Data