PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : MN-02/2021
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Manipur
 (i) State / Union Territory : Manipur  (ii) District : Imphal West  (iii) Forest Division : Central Forest Division,Imphal  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 0.898  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Dispensary/Hospital
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Central Forest Division,Imphal0.898Reserved Forest
Total 0.898
Division 1. : Central Forest Division,Imphal
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Imphal West0.898
Total0.898
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
10.8983Eco 1
Total. 0.898


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Eucalyptus sppNashik000869
Total 0 00 86 9
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 23


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : NIL
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : The forest area is prone to erosion,as the vegetation/tree cover is too less
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : Indian Rock Python, Barking Deer etc are reported to be found in the reserved Forest
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 3.95
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
111.796Langol Extension Reserved ForestSadar West Range6    View file
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
 (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
NIL

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Imphal West669002200022.651627.28614/09/202127.2860
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
Central Forest Division,ImphalCentral Forest CircleDFOYesTwo18/11/2020,28/08/2021
 Central Forest CircleCFYesOne20/11/2021
 Nodal OfficerNoNo Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
Central Forest Division,ImphalCentral Forest CircleDFO RecommendedAs the requirement of the area is for the purpose of construction of a Cancer Hospital which is a rare facility in the state and also as the area is identified as Government Khasland by the Court of law, the proposed diversion is, thus, recommended under the following conditions 1. the Trevi Hospital shall not ask for diversion of additional forest area and confine themselves within the boundary of Dag No. 1194 and Dag No. 1184 of Meitei Langol. 2. No earth material should be removed from the area without prior approval from competent authority and payment of necessary royalty.
Central Forest CircleCF RecommendedConsidering the need for a dedicated Cancer Hospital for treatment and care of cancer patients of the State which has recorded one of the highest cases of cancer in India suitability of the site with green forest surrounding, free from pollution as being located at about 5 Km away from Imphal city, the proposal for diversion of 0.898 hectare forest land in Comp. No.3 Lamdeng Block, Langol RF for construction of Trevi Private Hospital is recommended. Since, the Agency has started construction of the Hospital in violation of the provisions of FCA, 1980, the following conditions are also recommended in addition to the conditions recommended by the DFO a Payment of penal CA, penal NPV etc as deemed necessary by the authority. b User Agency shall clearly demarcate the area by erecting boundary pillars. Yes
Nodal Officer RecommendedThe proposed Hospital is expected to provide much needed medical care/cancer treatment to the people in and around Imphal and State as a whole.
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
ManipurState SecretaryRecommended28/07/2022Public Health ServiceState Govt. OfficerNo Data