PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
MH-067/2016
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Maharashtra
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Maharashtra
(ii)
District :
Chandrapur,Wardha,Yavatmal,Nanded,Hingoli
(iii)
Forest Division :
Chandrapur,Wardha,Pandharkawada,Yavatmal,Pusad
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
27.846
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Transmission Line
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Pandharkawada
2.205
Revenue Forest
2
Hingoly
1.131
Reserved Forest
3
Yavatmal
3.293
Reserved Forest
4
Pusad
6.004
Reserved Forest
5
Pandharkawada
15.213
Reserved Forest
Total
27.846
Division 1. : Beed
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(in ha.)
NIL
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
NIL
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
NIL
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
NIL
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
NIL
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
NIL
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
NIL
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
NIL
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
NIL
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
NIL
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
NIL
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
NIL
Division 2. : Hingoly
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Hingoli
1.131
Total
1.131
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
1.131
0.4
Eco 3
Total.
1.131
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Azadirachta Indica
Neem
0
10
3
0
0
0
2
Acacia leucophloea
Hivar
0
1
1
0
0
0
3
Butea Monosperma
Palas
0
1
0
0
0
0
Total
0
12
4
0
0
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
16
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
The proposed area for diversion falls in 1 patch of compartment no. 516B, the working plan has prescribed Silvi Pasture Working circle
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
This area is not vulnerable to erosion
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0.00
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
There is existence of Panther/Leopard (Panthera Pardus), Indian wolf (Canis lupas.pasllipes), Hyena (Hyaena hyaena), Chinkara/Gazella (Gazella gazelle bennetti), Four Horned Antelope (Tetraceros quadricomi), Black buck (Antelope Cervicapra), Common peafowl (Pavo cristatus), Nilgai (Boselaphus Tragocacnelus), Wild boar (Sus Scrofa)
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
13.45
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
2.262
RF
Hingoli
475A
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Site Inspection Report. Inspected on 07.02.2017 by DFO
Division 3. : Pandharkawada
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Yavatmal
17.418
Total
17.418
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
17.418
0.6
Eco 3
Total.
17.418
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Others
Aali
0
3
0
0
0
0
2
Terminalia Tomentosa
Ain
0
31
7
1
1
0
3
Others
Anjan
0
0
0
2
0
0
4
Others
Anjan
0
0
0
2
0
0
5
Others
Bahava
0
5
1
0
0
0
6
Terminalia Bellarica
Behada
0
9
2
2
1
0
7
Others
Bharas
0
1
0
0
0
0
8
Others
Bharati
0
2
1
0
0
0
9
Others
Bharawa
0
1
0
0
0
0
10
Others
Bhos
0
1
0
0
0
0
11
Others
Char
0
3
1
2
0
0
12
Others
Dhawda
0
128
20
4
1
0
13
Others
Dutkuda
0
40
10
0
0
0
14
Zizyphus Xylopyrus
Ghoti
0
1
0
0
0
0
15
Acacia leucophloea
Hiwar
0
2
23
7
0
0
16
Others
Karam
0
7
7
0
0
0
17
Others
Khadasani
0
1
0
0
0
0
18
Acacia Catechu
Khair
0
179
45
6
0
0
19
Others
Kharas
0
1
0
0
0
0
20
Others
Kusum
0
1
3
0
0
0
21
Others
Lendi
0
260
52
7
0
0
22
Ixora Parviflora
Lokhandi
0
3
0
0
0
0
23
Others
Maharukh
0
0
0
0
0
1
24
Others
Medi
0
1
0
0
0
0
25
Others
Moha
0
6
3
3
1
8
26
Others
Moha
0
6
3
3
1
8
27
Others
Mowai
0
0
0
3
0
0
28
Azadirachta Indica
Neem
0
29
8
1
1
0
29
Others
Padari
0
6
0
1
0
0
30
Butea Monosperma
Palas
0
870
187
24
6
4
31
Butea Monosperma
Palas
0
870
187
24
6
4
32
Others
Panjara
0
3
2
0
0
0
33
Others
Pipal
0
2
0
0
0
0
34
Tectona Grandis
Sagwan
0
223
276
135
68
24
35
Boswellia Serrata
Salai
0
2
6
7
23
33
36
Diasporus Melanoxylon
Tendu
0
188
38
8
2
5
37
Others
Yen
0
2
3
4
1
4
Total
0
2887
885
246
112
91
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
4221
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
The proposed area for diversion falls in 3 patches of Compartment no. 531, 154 and Gut no. 10. The working plan has prescribed Improvement Working Circle for compartment. no. 531, Misc. Working Circle for Compartment. No. 154.
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The area is not vulnerable to erosion
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Tiger, Chital, Nilghai, Wild Boar, Barking Deer etc. are present in this area
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
Yes
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Site Inspection Report. Inspected on 19.01.2017 by DCF, Pandharkawada
Division 4. : Pusad
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Yavatmal
6.004
Total
6.004
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
4.911
0.4
Eco 3
2
1.093
0.4
Eco 3
Total.
6.004
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Tectona Grandis
Teak
0
1011
438
68
6
1
2
Others
Ain
0
51
11
7
0
1
3
Cassia Fistula
Amaltas
0
4
0
0
1
0
4
Terminalia Arjuna
Anjan
0
3
2
4
3
6
5
Terminalia Bellarica
Behada
0
3
1
2
0
1
6
Semecarpus Anacardium
Biba
0
8
2
0
0
0
7
Others
Bor
0
10
2
0
0
0
8
Others
Char
0
13
3
1
0
0
9
Others
Chokh
0
1
0
1
0
0
10
Others
Dhawanda
0
0
3
4
0
0
11
Wrigtria Tingtoria
Dudhi
0
1
0
0
0
0
12
Others
Garadi
0
2
0
0
0
0
13
Others
Haladbehra
0
1
0
0
0
0
14
Azadirachta Indica
Kadulimb
0
1
0
0
1
0
15
Acacia Catechu
Khair
0
2
2
0
0
0
16
Lagerstroemia Parviflora
Lendi
0
12
1
0
0
0
17
Others
Lokhandi
0
9
2
2
0
0
18
Others
Moha
0
3
2
3
5
2
19
Others
Moyen
0
2
4
13
2
0
20
Others
Moi
0
0
6
4
0
0
21
Others
Padari
0
0
3
4
4
4
22
Butea Monosperma
Palas
0
148
65
8
2
0
23
Ficus Religiosa
Pimple
0
0
0
1
2
0
24
Others
Rodha
0
1
0
2
0
0
25
Boswellia Serrata
Salai
0
7
10
35
11
2
26
Diasporus Melanoxylon
Tendu
0
8
3
1
0
0
Total
0
1301
560
160
37
17
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
2075
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
The proposed area for diversion falls in 02 patches of Compt. no. 436 and 437 and the working plan has been prescribed SCI working circle.
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
This area is not vulnerable to erosion.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0.00
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Nilgai (Boselaphus Tragocanelus), Wild boar (Sus scrofa), Common langur (Presbytis entelles), Jungle cat (Felis chaus), Black buck (Antelope cervicapra), Bibat (Panthera pardus), Taras (Canis aureus), Indian fox (Vulpes bengalensis), Hare (Lepus nigracollis), Sloth Bear (Melursus Ursinus)
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
320.20
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
53.430
RF
Digras
774
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Site Inspection Report. Inspected on 09.01.2017
Division 5. : Yavatmal
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Yavatmal
3.293
Total
3.293
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
3.293
0.4
Eco 3
Total.
3.293
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Tectona Grandis
Sagwan
0
552
201
104
8
1
2
Gmelina Arborea
Salai
0
0
0
0
1
1
3
Mimusops Elengi
Babul
0
1
0
0
0
0
4
Hardwickia Binnata
Anjan
0
0
0
2
0
0
5
Aegle Marmelos
Bela
0
0
0
3
0
0
6
Acacia leucophloea
Hivar
0
3
1
1
0
0
7
Terminialia Crenulata
Yen
0
23
3
2
1
0
8
Butea Monosperma
Palas
0
153
54
4
0
0
9
Diasporus Melanoxylon
Tendu
0
41
3
0
0
0
10
Azadirachta Indica
Neem
0
0
0
1
0
0
11
Terminalia Bellarica
Behada
0
0
1
0
0
0
12
Others
Bhosa
0
1
0
0
0
0
13
Others
Dhawda
0
33
1
1
0
0
14
Others
Kinhi
0
1
1
0
0
0
15
Others
Lendi
0
23
5
1
0
0
16
Others
Maungha
0
1
0
0
0
1
17
Others
Movai
0
1
4
7
3
0
18
Others
Bharati
0
1
0
0
0
0
19
Others
Temberi
0
1
0
0
0
0
Total
0
835
274
126
13
3
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
1251
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
The proposed area for diversion falls in 1 patch of compartment no. 20, the working plan has prescribed Selection cum improvement Working Circle
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
This area is not vulnerable to erosion
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0.00
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Panther (Panthera Pardus), Stiped Hyena (Hyena), Jackal (Canis aurens), Indian Fox (Vulpes bengalensis), Cheetal (Axis axis), Peacock (Pavo, cristatus), Nilgai (Boselaphus Tragocemelus), Sloth bear (Melursus Urisinus), Wild Boar(Sus Scrofa), Common Langur (Presbytis entelius), Tiger (Pantheretigris).
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Site Inspection Report. Inspected on 14.01.2017 by DCF, Yavatmal.
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Yavatmal
477921
90764.71
898.31
21
33.00
20/02/2017
0.00
0.00
2
Hingoli
452600.00
29081.00
151.39
04
269.69
12/01/2017
5.43
0.00
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Yavatmal
Yavatmal
DFO
Yes
One
14/01/2017
Hingoly
Aurangabad
DFO
Yes
One
07/02/2017
Pusad
Yavatmal
DFO
Yes
One
09/01/2017
Pandharkawada
Yavatmal
DFO
Yes
One
19/01/2017
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Yavatmal
Yavatmal
DFO
Recommended
The proposal is recommended to be sanctioned as it will improve the transmission capacity of centralIndia
Hingoly
Aurangabad
DFO
Recommended
The proposal is recommended for sanction.
Pusad
Yavatmal
DFO
Recommended
The proposal is recommended for sanction.
Pandharkawada
Yavatmal
DFO
Recommended
The Proposal is recommended for sanction. Since the same is linear in nature and it will improve the transmission capacity of central India
Yavatmal
CF
Recommended
quetiapin ritalin
quetiapin mod angst
quetiapin wirkstoff
Yes
Aurangabad
CF
Recommended
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Maharashtra
State Secretary
Recommended
26/07/2017
State Govt. Officer
No Data
17.
Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional Office
Recommendation By
MoEF File No.
Date of Stage-I Clearance
Clearance Letter
Nagpur
Regional Office
FC-II/MH-65/2017-NGP
02/09/2017
18.
Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.
Application No.
Total Amount (Rs.)
Recieved Amount (Rs.)
Transaction Date
Transaction ID
Bank Name
Mode of Payment
Demmand Generated By User Agency
Demmand Verified By Nodal Officer
Uploaded Demand Letter
FP/MH/TRANS/20108/2016
TRANS201082016983
78,653,138.00
78,653,138.00
03/10/2017
SBINR52017100300055738
Corporation Bank
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
25/09/2017
25/09/2017
23.
Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.
Date of Stage-II Clearance
Proposal Status
Clearance Letter
FP/MH/TRANS/20108/2016
Approved In-Principle
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×