PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : MH-0153/2020
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Maharashtra
 (i) State / Union Territory : Maharashtra  (ii) District : Nanded  (iii) Forest Division : Nanded  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 5.34  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Road
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Nanded5.34Reserved Forest
Total 5.34
Division 1. : Nanded
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Nanded5.34
Total5.34
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
15.340.2Eco 3
Total. 5.34


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Butea MonospermaPalas35219100
2Azadirachta IndicaLimb012200
3Madhuca indicaMoha042210
4Terminalia BellaricaBehada001100
5OthersRohani001000
6OthersPimpari000100
7Ailanthus excelsaMaharukh002100
8Cassia FistulaBahawa030000
9Terminalia TomentosaAin075200
10Acacia leucophloeaHiwar010000
11Albezzia LabbeckShiras000001
12OthersCharoli020000
13Diasporus MelanoxylonTendu100000
14OthersDhawada014100
15Ficus ReligiosaPimpal000100
16Semecarpus AnacardiumBiba110000
17Lagerstroemia ParvifloraLendi010000
18Ficus RacemosaUmbar010000
19Wrigtria TingtoriaDudhi110000
20Tectona GrandisSag1310118600
21OthersRagatbed010000
22OthersHanmanka010000
23OthersBhoi200000
Total 21 17854 181 1
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 273


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : IWC
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : to some extent vulnerable for erosion
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : peacock, wild pig & black buck etc
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : Yes
  (a)Details of violation(s): subgrade
   (b) Period of Work done(year) : 2020
   (c) Area of forest land involved in violation (in ha.) : 0.735
S. No. Name of person responsible for violation Designation & Address of person responsible for violationAction taken against the person responsible for violation
1Shakeel Tahasildarproject manager Nikhil Construction PuneNotice issued to responsible officer regardingviolation of FCA act
2D D KolekarResident Engineer c v Kand Consultant Pvt Ltd pune JV with Shrikhande Consultant Pvt Ltd MumbaiNotice issued to responsible officer regardingviolation of FCA act
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : No
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 72.15
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
1110.68RFNanded401 B 403 A    View file
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
 (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 Part II online & offline uploaded
2 Site Inspection Report upload

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Nanded1052000130003.450121.6312161.1831/01/2021161.182292.40
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
 Nodal OfficerNoNo Data
NandedAurangabadDFOYesOne13/02/2021
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
NandedAurangabadDFO RecommendedThe diversion of minimum forest land is recommended for the following reasons 1. Road proposed has been declared as National Highway connecting Nanded District of Maharashtra & Telangana state to create good connectivity between these two states. 2. This is being widening of existing road having 5.50 to 7.50 meter carriage width. Minimum forest is required which is unavoidable & no realignment is proposed in forest area. 3. Widening of road will improve socio economic status of Nanded & Bhokar tq. 4. Most of the areas are along the project Road is agriculture belt. And thus it also will boost up agriculture growth in this area.
AurangabadCF RecommendedThe forest land proposed to be diverted for this project is unavoidable and is the barest minimum. Yes
Nodal Officer RecommendedThe diversion of minimum forest land is recommended for the following reasons No suitable alternate land is available and the forest land required is minimum. Proposed project is not likely to affect any mounmental site of cultural, historical, religious, archeological or recreational importance.
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
MaharashtraState SecretaryRecommended07/12/2021PCCF HoFF Office has recommended proposal for approvalState Govt. OfficerNo Data
17. Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional OfficeRecommendation ByMoEF File No.Date of Stage-I ClearanceClearance Letter
NagpurRegional OfficeFC-II/MH-164/2021-NGP31/12/2021
18. Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.Application No.Total Amount (Rs.)Recieved Amount (Rs.)Transaction DateTransaction IDBank NameMode of PaymentDemmand Generated By User AgencyDemmand Verified By Nodal OfficerUploaded Demand Letter
FP/MH/ROAD/47068/2020ROAD47068202041220,970,150.0020,970,150.0020/04/2023928983Union Bank Of IndiaNEFT/RTGS (Challan)03/04/202305/04/2023
23. Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.Date of Stage-II ClearanceProposal StatusClearance Letter
FP/MH/ROAD/47068/2020Approved In-PrincipleNo Data