PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
MH-080/2018
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Maharashtra
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Maharashtra
(ii)
District :
Nashik,Thane
(iii)
Forest Division :
West Nashik(Nashik),Shahapur,Thane
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
383.8535
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Road
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
West Nashik(Nashik)
39.177
Reserved Forest
2
Shahapur
104.2802
Reserved Forest
3
Shahapur
143.7654
Protected Forest
4
Shahapur
3.5125
Finally Acquired Private Forest
5
Shahapur
60.1452
Private Forest
6
Shahapur
6.1453
Areas notified under Section 35 of the IFA
7
Thane
13.4731
Protected Forest
8
Thane
13.3548
Private Forest
Total
383.8535
Division 1. : Shahapur
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Thane
317.8486
Total
317.8486
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
251.5581
0.4
Eco 1
2
66.2905
0.2
Eco 1
Total.
317.8486
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Tectona Grandis
Teak
8986
10892
1956
200
48
4
2
Acacia Catechu
Khair
1734
928
60
4
8
0
3
Terminalia Tomentosa
Ain
16134
21845
4598
731
173
20
4
Others
Others
35723
18085
6174
1784
606
335
Total
62577
51750
12788
2719
835
359
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
131028
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
Tropical Moist Deciduous Forest
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The forest land involved in the project is prone to normal rates of erosion.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0.00
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
No rare or in dangerous or unique species of flora and fauna in proposed forest land.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
Yes
Details of Protected Area and comments on the impact of Project on the ESZ :
The forest land involved in the proposal falls within 10 kms distance from the boundary of Tansa Wildlife Sanctuary. But it has no adverse effect on the flora and fauna of Tansa WLS. The project authority has submitted the proposal for clearance of National Wildlife Board.
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i).
Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no
District Name
Village
Area(in ha.)
khasra
KML file
Present Owner file
1
Aurangabad
Umravati
12.8535
495
2
Aurangabad
Andhari
239
293, 476, 740, 512
3
Aurangabad
Jatwa
132
95, 93, 65, 14, 192
(ii).
Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iii).
Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
NA
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Wild Life Clearance
2
No Violation Thane
3
Part-II Shahapur
4
NPV Certificate
5
Non Forest Land Certificate
6
Part-II Nashik
7
No Violation Nashik
8
Part-II Thane
9
No Violation Shahapur
Division 2. : Thane
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Thane
26.8279
Total
26.8279
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
26.8279
0.4
Eco 1
Total.
26.8279
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Tectona Grandis
sag
424
523
83
20
6
0
2
Acacia Catechu
Khair
0
1
1
0
0
0
3
Terminalia Tomentosa
Ain
535
366
102
17
3
0
4
Others
injali
167
247
115
33
7
0
Total
1126
1137
301
70
16
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
2650
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
The area is fuel wood & improvement working circle as per shri K.P.singh & M mM Ngullie working plan 2010.11 to 2019.20 the slope is gently with scrubby growth
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The forest land involved in the project is prone to normal rates of erosion.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0.005
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Rabit, fox
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i).
Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no
District Name
Village
Area(in ha.)
khasra
KML file
Present Owner file
1
Aurangabad
Umravati
12.8535
495
2
Aurangabad
Andhari
239
293, 476, 740, 512
3
Aurangabad
Jatwa
132
95, 93, 65, 14, 192
(ii).
Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iii).
Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
NA
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
NIL
Division 3. : West Nashik(Nashik)
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Nashik
39.177
Total
39.177
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
39.177
0.4
Eco 3
Total.
39.177
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
NIL
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The forest land involved in the project is prone to normal rate of erosion
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
No rare or in dangerous or unique species of flora and fauna in proposed forest land
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i).
Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no
District Name
Village
Area(in ha.)
khasra
KML file
Present Owner file
1
Aurangabad
Umravati
12.8535
495
2
Aurangabad
Andhari
239
293, 476, 740, 512
3
Aurangabad
Jatwa
132
95, 93, 65, 14, 192
(ii).
Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iii).
Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
NA
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
NIL
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Nashik
1553000
342527
667.5
44
1330.88
31/03/2017
667.5
599.42
2
Thane
145713
60117.122
3492.4984
34
1209.136
21/07/2018
1209.136
36.605
3
Thane
4241.5
1701.087
1389.211
96
1403.15
31/03/2016
1423.149
118.382
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Shahapur
Thane
DFO
Yes
Two
12/07/2018,14/07/2018
Thane
Thane
DFO
Yes
One
02/07/2018
West Nashik(Nashik)
Nashik
DFO
Yes
One
01/08/2018
Thane
CF
Yes
One
06/08/2018
Nashik
CF
Yes
One
07/08/2018
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Shahapur
Thane
DFO
Recommended
The requirement of forest land as proposed by the Project Authority is unavoidable and barest minimum for project. The proposal is recommended for acceptance.
Thane
Thane
DFO
Recommended
The requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable. The proposal is recommended for acceptance.
West Nashik(Nashik)
Nashik
DFO
Recommended
Thane
CF
Recommended
Yes
Nashik
CF
Recommended
The proposal is recommended for acceptance in view of fast and safe road traffic and for overall development of movement in the area
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
The Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation ltd. is planning development coordinating and implementing agency established by the Govt. of Maharashtra. The Nagpur Mumbai Express has been designated as Maharashtra properity corridor basically with the three objectives, viz, to cut down distance/travel time between Nagpur and Mumbai. The Project will also support the development of Marathwada and Vidarbha regions. It is planned to develop new industries/educational/commercial/tourism nodes in vicinity of express way at a regular interval of 40 50 kms.
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Maharashtra
State Secretary
Recommended
15/12/2018
Recommended for approval.
State Govt. Officer
No Data
17.
Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional Office
Recommendation By
MoEF File No.
Date of Stage-I Clearance
Clearance Letter
Nagpur
Regional Office
FC-III-MH-35-2018-NGP
06/02/2019
18.
Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.
Application No.
Total Amount (Rs.)
Recieved Amount (Rs.)
Transaction Date
Transaction ID
Bank Name
Mode of Payment
Demmand Generated By User Agency
Demmand Verified By Nodal Officer
Uploaded Demand Letter
FP/MH/ROAD/34047/2018
ROAD340472018578
747,908,214.00
747,908,214.00
04/04/2019
N094190220192419
Corporation Bank
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
28/03/2019
01/04/2019
23.
Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.
Date of Stage-II Clearance
Proposal Status
Clearance Letter
FP/MH/ROAD/34047/2018
Approved In-Principle
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×