PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
MH-052/2019
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Maharashtra
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Maharashtra
(ii)
District :
Chandrapur
(iii)
Forest Division :
Chandrapur
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
374.75
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Rehabilitation
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Chandrapur
374.75
Reserved Forest
Total
374.75
Division 1. : Chandrapur
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Chandrapur
374.75
Total
374.75
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
374.75
0.3
Eco 3
Total.
374.75
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Acacia Nilotica
Babul
0
888
739
136
23
7
2
Cassia Fistula
Bahawa
0
2
2
0
0
0
3
Aegle Marmelos
Bel
0
0
1
3
0
0
4
Others
Bhera
0
0
1
0
0
0
5
Others
Bor
0
4
2
2
0
0
6
Tamarindus Indica
Chinch
0
0
6
7
6
6
7
Acacia leucophloea
Hiwar
0
512
497
62
7
1
8
Azadirachta Indica
Neem
0
51
31
14
7
7
9
Others
Kavat
0
195
178
39
1
1
10
Acacia Catechu
Khair
0
16
3
7
0
0
11
Others
Kalam
0
3
3
0
1
1
12
Others
Medsing
0
5
45
1
0
0
13
Madhuka Indica
Moha
0
1
1
0
0
0
14
Butea Monosperma
Palas
0
73
31
22
8
1
15
Tectona Grandis
Sag
0
1
1
0
0
1
16
Dalbergia Latifolia
Shisham
0
1
0
0
0
0
17
Albizzia lebbeck
Siras
0
0
0
0
2
2
18
Others
Subabul
0
0
0
1
1
0
19
Others
Others
0
19
18
7
0
2
Total
0
1771
1559
301
56
29
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
3716
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
IWC, Comptt No. 14B, Area 374.75 Ha., Reserved Forest.
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The forest area in question being a Flat land is not vulnerable to erosion. It did not form part of eroded area.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Certificate of No Monuments
2
Certificate of Scheduled Tribe and Other Traditional Dwellers
3
Certificate of Protected Area
4
Certificate of NPV
5
Certificate of Fauna or Flora
6
Certificate of Cutting and Felling of Trees
7
Certificate of Document Verification
8
Certificate of CA
9
Map of DGPS Survey
10
Certificate of No Violation
11
Certificate of Outside Scheduled Tribe Area
12
Part-II
13
Map of 10.00 Km. Radius
14
Tree Felling Estimate
15
Certificate of Identified Forest
16
Map of Layout Plan
17
Map of Index
18
Map of Location
19
Map of Distance from PA Area
20
Certificate of Barest Minimum Demand
21
Certificate of Boundary of Protected Area
22
Certificate of National Park or Wildlife Sanctuary
23
Working Plan Information
24
Site Inspection Report
25
Certificate of Fixing Boundary Stone
26
Map of Geo Reference
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Chandrapur
324250.00
60720.56
1568.57
25
695.37
24/04/2019
695.37
123.10
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Chandrapur
Chandrapur
DFO
Yes
One
18/04/2019
Chandrapur
CF
Yes
One
22/05/2019
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Chandrapur
Chandrapur
DFO
Recommended
Recommended for acceptance of the proposal for better management of Tadoba Andhari Tiger Reserve.
Chandrapur
CF
Recommended
Rehabilitation of Rantalodhi village from TATR core area is very much essential for overall conservation of the Tiger and other associated wild animals. 244 families of Rantalodhi are expects to be shifted to the proposed area of 374.75 ha.. Hence the necessity of the proposal.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Recommendation
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Maharashtra
State Secretary
Recommended
04/11/2019
Recommended for approval
State Govt. Officer
No Data
17.
Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional Office
Recommendation By
MoEF File No.
Date of Stage-I Clearance
Clearance Letter
Nagpur
Head Office
8-31/2019-FC
02/06/2022
23.
Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.
Date of Stage-II Clearance
Proposal Status
Clearance Letter
FP/MH/REHAB/39365/2019
Approved In-Principle
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×