PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
MH-0282/2021
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Maharashtra
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Maharashtra
(ii)
District :
Satara
(iii)
Forest Division :
Satara
 (iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
76.17
 (v)
Category of the Proposal:
Rehabilitation
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Satara
76.17
Reserved Forest
Total
76.17
Division 1. : Satara
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Satara
76.17
Total
76.17
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
76.17
0.4
Eco 3
Total.
76.17
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Others
Akeshiya
131
205
70
13
2
1
2
Terminalia Tomentosa
Ain
723
606
22
3
0
0
3
Others
Katak
4
8
1
0
0
0
4
Pongamia Pinnata
Karanj
80
108
30
8
2
0
5
Azadirachta Indica
Kanchan
126
49
3
0
0
0
6
Cassia Siamea
Kashid
8
33
13
3
0
0
7
Others
Kuda
1
0
0
0
0
0
8
Others
Kusumbi
1
0
0
0
0
0
9
Acacia Catechu
Khair
377
658
15
4
1
0
10
Others
Gulmohar
2
4
1
0
0
0
11
Others
Gliricidia
677
2252
318
22
6
0
12
Others
Char
0
2
0
0
0
0
13
Syzigium Cumini
Jambhul
2
2
3
1
0
2
14
Grewia Tiliaefolia
Dhaman
5
8
0
0
0
0
15
Others
Dhavada
237
50
2
0
0
0
16
Eucalyptus
Nilgiri
294
392
77
14
4
0
17
Butea Monosperma
Palas
8
22
4
2
0
1
18
Others
Babhul
0
3
5
2
0
0
19
Others
Barthondi
0
3
0
0
0
0
20
Others
Bibi
2
15
3
0
0
0
21
Aegle Marmelos
Bilava
4
16
4
2
0
0
22
Others
Bhuta
2
5
0
0
0
0
23
Madhuca indica
Mohi
42
90
2
0
0
0
24
Azadirachta Indica
Limb
64
130
27
10
10
0
25
Others
Lendi
6
6
0
0
0
0
26
Others
Varas
3
5
0
0
0
0
27
Holoptelia integrifolia
Valava
10
30
9
5
1
0
28
Albezzia Labbeck
Shiras
4
10
3
2
1
1
29
Gmelina Arborea
Sivan
48
58
9
0
0
0
30
Bombax Ceiba
Sivar
3
9
6
2
1
0
31
Teak
Sag
2265
2215
109
4
1
0
32
Others
Sisam
6
15
2
1
0
0
33
Dalburgia Sisoo
Sisu
112
216
25
2
0
0
34
Others
Hivar
37
108
3
0
0
0
35
Terminalia Bellarica
Hela
6
9
0
0
1
0
36
Others
Chinch
0
1
0
0
0
0
37
Others
Dhayati
1
0
0
0
0
0
38
Others
Fasi
0
1
0
0
0
0
39
Others
Bor
0
1
0
0
0
0
40
Others
Bhokar
0
0
0
0
0
1
41
Samania Saman
Rentree
0
0
0
0
0
1
42
Others
Waghati
0
2
0
0
0
0
43
Others
Sawar
1
0
0
0
0
0
44
Others
Subabhul
4
73
94
9
1
3
45
Others
Humbar
0
0
1
0
0
0
46
Others
Aapta
7
10
1
0
0
0
47
Others
Ashok
0
2
0
0
0
0
48
Others
Kalamb
1
4
0
0
0
0
49
Others
Kumbha
0
1
0
0
0
0
50
Others
Gavanda
1
2
0
0
0
0
51
Others
Tarawad
1
0
0
0
0
0
52
Others
Tyag
1
4
0
0
0
0
53
Others
Nanya
1
5
0
0
0
0
54
Others
Pangira
0
1
1
0
0
0
55
Others
Bakuli
0
1
0
0
0
0
56
Others
Medhasing
0
2
0
0
0
0
57
Others
Ranmoha
1
0
0
0
0
0
58
Others
Ruti
1
2
0
0
0
0
59
Others
Hirada
0
2
0
0
0
0
Total
5310
7456
863
109
31
10
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
13779
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The forest land is degraded type so forest to be diverted is not vulnerable to erosion.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0.00
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Gaur, Panthor, Mouse dear, Wild boar, peacock etc.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
acknowledgement slip
2
online part 1
3
certificate 37
4
Manually part 1
5
Site Inspection report
6
project note
7
certificate 18 & 19
8
certificate 20
9
Authority letter
10
part iii to v
11
certificate 38 & 39
12
7 12 uatara
13
certificate 17
14
Certificate No 21 to 36
15
Manually part 2
16
certificate 1 to 16
17
Justification
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Satara
1048400
156764
1062.17
91
179.45
31/03/2021
161.46
650.59
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Satara
Kolhapur
DFO
Yes
One
24/12/2021
Kolhapur
CF
Yes
One
11/01/2022
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Satara
Kolhapur
DFO
Recommended
Total 76.17 ha. forest land will be diverted under this project, but 88.36 ha. non forest land will be received under this project to forest department, which will higher than diverted forest land. Rehabilitation of Kolane village from the core area of Chandoli National Park. Sahyadri Tiger Reserved Will help to make the core area invoilet, which will definitely aid in wildlife Conservation.
Kolhapur
CF
Recommended
Recommended for sanction
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Recommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Maharashtra
State Secretary
Recommended
13/06/2022
Recommended for approval
State Govt. Officer
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×