PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : MH-070/2019
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Maharashtra
 (i) State / Union Territory : Maharashtra  (ii) District : Mumbai (Suburban),Raigad  (iii) Forest Division : Mangrove,Alibag  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 22.9648  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Pipeline
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Alibag12.0432Mangrove Forest
2Alibag1.1712Unclassed Forests
3Alibag0.3041Private Forest
4Alibag0.6784Reserved Forest
5Alibag0.9667Proposed Reserved Forests (Sec-4 of IFA)
6Mangrove5.32Unclassed Forests
7Mangrove2.4812Proposed Reserved Forests (Sec-4 of IFA)
Total 22.9648
Division 1. : Alibag
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Raigad15.3616
Total15.3616
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
112.04320.4Eco 2
23.12040.2Eco 1
Total. 15.1636


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1OthersManvrove species, Ain, Teak, Swawar, Kinjal, Shemat, Karanj, Wad89882190499000
Total 8988 2190499 00 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 11677


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : NIL
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : The project area is not vulnerable to erosion
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : NIL
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 395.26626
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
114Reserved Forest under Section 4 of IFAKarjat EastS,No. 23/0    View file
224Reserved Forest under Section 4 of IFAKarjat EastS,No. 23/0    View file
3313Reserved Forest under Section 4 of IFAKarjat EastS.No. 37    View file
4415Reserved Forest under Section 4 of IFAPanvelS.No. 62, 65 (old S.No. 61 and 64)    View file
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
 (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 Alternative Alignment certificate of DCF
2 Chronological events
3 Distance from Protected area
4 NPV certificate
5 Tree felling Estimate
6 Tree cutting certificate
7 Identified Forest Certificate
8 Archaeological certificate
9 Document Verification certificate of DCF
10 Information furnish in English
11 List of Identified forest
12 No violation certificate
13 Wildlife certificate
Division 2. : Mangrove
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Mumbai (Suburban)7.8012
Total7.8012
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
17.80120.4Eco 2
Total. 7.8012


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
NIL
5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : NA
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : The area is not vulnerable and there is no possiblity of erosion. The slop of area is plain and topography of area is mudflat.
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : The distance from TCFS is 5.5 KM and SGNP is 11.2 Km.
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): Yes
  Details of Protected Area and comments on the impact of Project on the ESZ : The proposed project alignment is outside the proposed ESZ area of Thane Creek Flamingo Sanctuary. Therefore the project does not have any adverse effect on any species of Flora and Fauna within the area.
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
NO Data

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 NPV certificate of DFO MMCU
2 Certificate of identified forest of DFO MMCU
3 area statement of DFO MMCU
4 undertaking of cost of removal of shrub exploitation of user agency.
5 archeological certificate of DFO MMCU
6 Wildlife certificate of DFO MMCU
7 No violation certificate of DFO MMCU

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Mumbai (Suburban)446003948.08172.45786031/03/201900
2Raigad715200164768 1222.4483 892113.0954 31/03/20192113.0954 367.4640
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
AlibagThaneDFOYesOne05/02/2020
 MangroveCFNoNo Data
 ThaneCFNoNo Data
MangroveMangroveDFOYesOne23/08/2019
 Nodal OfficerNoNo Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
AlibagThaneDFO RecommendedThis proposal is for construction of underground Petroleum products pipeline with OFC and associated facilities from Mahul Mumbai Suburban District to Rasayani Raigad District is a safe mode of transportation of petroleum product that leads to reduce road congestion, lower energy consumption and is environmental friendly by minimizing gaseous emission in transit. The proposed pipeline is for public utility and for supply of aviation fuel to proposed Navi Mumbai International Airport. This project is recommended as this is an infrastructure development and public utility project. Project proponent is ready to bear all the Government levies hence the proposal is being recommended for approval for diverting the required forest land under Forest Conservation Act, 1980.
MangroveMangroveDFO RecommendedThe project is recommended as the pipeline is safe mode of transportation, reduce road congestion, lower energy consumption and environmental friendly by minimizing gaseous emission in transit. The proposed pipeline is for public utility and supply of aviation fuel to proposed Navi Mumbai International Airport and after completion of project the diverted land is resorted back to its normal condition by project proponent.
MangroveCF RecommendedThe proposed project is for public utility, environmental friendly and for supply of aviation fuel to proposed Navi Mumbai International Airport. After the completion of project the diverted land should back to its normal condition by the project proponent. Yes
ThaneCF RecommendedPart 3 and ccf covering letter attachedYes
Nodal Officer Recommendedrecommendation
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
MaharashtraState SecretaryRecommended26/03/2021 State Govt. OfficerNo Data
17. Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional OfficeRecommendation ByMoEF File No.Date of Stage-I ClearanceClearance Letter
NagpurRegional OfficeFC-II/MH-163/2021-NGP10/08/2022
18. Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.Application No.Total Amount (Rs.)Recieved Amount (Rs.)Transaction DateTransaction IDBank NameMode of PaymentDemmand Generated By User AgencyDemmand Verified By Nodal OfficerUploaded Demand Letter
FP/MH/Pipeline/39455/2019PIPELINE39455201937871,351,967.0071,351,967.0024/08/2023110045Union Bank Of IndiaNEFT/RTGS (Challan)12/06/202313/06/2023
19. Uploaded Status of Land to be transferred to Forest Department under FCA (Mutation Details).
  (i). Whether CA Land is mandatorily required in this Proposal : Yes   (ii). Total Land identified for raising CA: 46   (iii). No. of Maintenance years: 10   (iv). Total No. of Patches/Parcel: 4
  No. of patches : 2
Patch wise details
Patch No. Shape of land identified for CA Area of Patch/Parcel(in ha.)
2Block(Polygon)15
  Status of CA Land so identified : Forest Area   Site Name : Morbe , Panvel   Location Details : S. No. 61 & 64   Uploaded GPS File :   Uploaded Scanned copy of Map :
Status of CA Land so identified
Name of Forest. Legal Status of Forest Land
MorbeRF
  No. of patches : 3
Patch wise details
Patch No. Shape of land identified for CA Area of Patch/Parcel(in ha.)
3Block(Polygon)8
  Status of CA Land so identified : Forest Area   Site Name : Kashele , Karjat   Location Details : S no -23   Uploaded GPS File :   Uploaded Scanned copy of Map :
Status of CA Land so identified
Name of Forest. Legal Status of Forest Land
KasheleRF
  No. of patches : 1
Patch wise details
Patch No. Shape of land identified for CA Area of Patch/Parcel(in ha.)
1Block(Polygon)10
  Status of CA Land so identified : Forest Area   Site Name : Palaspe, Panvel   Location Details : S no. 76   Uploaded GPS File :   Uploaded Scanned copy of Map :
Status of CA Land so identified
Name of Forest. Legal Status of Forest Land
PalaspeRF
  No. of patches : 4
Patch wise details
Patch No. Shape of land identified for CA Area of Patch/Parcel(in ha.)
4Block(Polygon)13
  Status of CA Land so identified : Forest Area   Site Name : Dahigaon and Vengaon, Karjat   Location Details : Dahigaon s no. 60/1/B Vengaon s no 13/1/A   Uploaded GPS File :   Uploaded Scanned copy of Map :
Status of CA Land so identified
Name of Forest. Legal Status of Forest Land
Dahigaon and VengaonPF
20. Mutation Details Verified By Nodal Officer
Proposal No.Verified DateMutation LetterRemarks
FP/MH/Pipeline/39455/201920 Sep 2023No DataVerify
21. Compliance Details Submitted by User Agency
Proposal No.Compliance Details submitted on(Date)Uploaded Letter
FP/MH/Pipeline/39455/201920 Sep 2023
22. Compliance Details Verified by Nodal Officer
Proposal No.RemarksVerified DateUploaded Letter
FP/MH/Pipeline/39455/2019Recommended01 Dec 2023
23. Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.Date of Stage-II ClearanceProposal StatusClearance Letter
FP/MH/Pipeline/39455/201922 Dec 2023APPROVED