PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
MH-0114/2021
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Maharashtra
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Maharashtra
(ii)
District :
Chandrapur
(iii)
Forest Division :
Bramhapuri
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
35.94
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Mining
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Bramhapuri
35.94
Reserved Forest
Total
35.94
Division 1. : Bramhapuri
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Chandrapur
35.94
Total
35.94
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
35.94
0.5
Eco 3
Total.
35.94
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Pterocarpus Marsupium
Bija
1
17
55
98
83
52
2
Others
Ain
47
105
169
134
81
38
3
Others
Haldu
0
0
1
0
0
0
4
Others
Kalam
28
139
45
26
14
9
5
Mammea Longifolia
Moha
4
40
24
14
14
8
6
Others
Rohan
6
17
1
0
0
0
7
Others
Mowai
68
132
61
40
28
15
8
Others
Chichawa
19
119
135
74
18
12
9
Others
Dhawada
36
142
67
43
10
2
10
Others
Palas
3
6
3
0
0
0
11
Others
Awala
1
1
1
1
2
0
12
Others
Bhera
206
380
232
111
25
10
13
Others
Char
42
186
88
18
6
1
14
Others
Bel
36
211
90
16
4
1
15
Others
Khair
1
10
0
0
0
0
16
Others
Semal
0
1
1
9
3
5
17
Others
kasai
16
79
102
40
5
1
18
Others
Ghoghar
60
349
224
52
11
1
19
Others
Parad
222
678
178
29
11
2
20
Diasporus Melanoxylon
Tendu
29
19
15
14
1
0
21
Others
Kakai
11
38
3
1
0
0
22
Others
Ghoti
96
251
27
2
0
0
23
Others
Biba
6
6
0
0
0
0
24
Others
Kawat
4
10
3
0
0
0
25
Tamarindus Indica
Chinch
0
0
5
5
3
4
26
Terminalia Bellarica
Behada
0
0
3
9
3
1
27
Others
Sehana
28
168
198
130
35
10
28
Hardwickia Binnata
Aanjan
0
1
1
0
0
0
29
Others
Kojab
27
71
46
11
9
2
30
Others
Garadi
1695
3014
1077
72
9
3
31
Others
Hiwar
0
0
2
1
0
0
32
Others
Kinhi
1
1
0
0
0
0
33
Others
Karanj
0
2
0
0
0
0
34
Others
Silari
1
4
5
5
5
0
35
Lagerstroemia Parviflora
Lendia
8
23
0
0
0
0
36
Others
Jondhurli
0
0
1
0
0
0
37
Others
Other
384
771
112
43
11
5
38
Cassia Fistula
bahava
76
182
12
1
1
0
39
Others
Tiwas
3
18
5
13
2
2
40
Others
Lokhandi
3
4
0
0
0
0
41
Dalbergia Latifolia
Sisam
52
384
159
30
0
0
42
Tectona Grandis
Sag
169
534
380
288
143
34
43
Others
Dhaman
309
553
38
6
0
0
Total
3698
8666
3569
1336
537
218
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
18024
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
Improvement Working Circle
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The Forest area in question being the hilly land & flat land are vulnerable to erosion
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Tiger, Leopard, Deer, Beer, Wild pig, Wild dog Nilgai etc
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i).
Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no
District Name
Village
Area(in ha.)
khasra
KML file
Present Owner file
1
Yavatmal
UMARI UJARA
36.49
107, 108, 109, 110, 114, 117, 118 and 121
(ii).
Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iii).
Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
NA
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Dy Certificate
2
Part II
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Chandrapur
324250
119970
2198.02
23
931.23
01/04/2023
931.23
607.36
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Bramhapuri
Chandrapur
DFO
Yes
One
10/04/2023
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Bramhapuri
Chandrapur
DFO
Not-Recommended
this proposal is not recommended. However with comprehensive wildlife mitigation structure and plan duly approved by Wildlife Board the project may be considered. For this mitigation plan to be prepared a details study by WII should be conducted. Wildlife mitigation plan prepared under ToR of EIA seems to be insufficient. Hence, a detailed plan should be prepared taking into account tiger and other wildlife animal density as well as man animal conflict.
Chandrapur
CF
Not-Recommended
Not Recommended
No
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×