PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : MH-0161/2019
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Maharashtra
 (i) State / Union Territory : Maharashtra  (ii) District : Nagpur  (iii) Forest Division : Nagpur  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 99.95  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Mining
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Nagpur99.95Reserved Forest
Total 99.95
Division 1. : Nagpur
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Nagpur99.95
Total99.95
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
199.950.4Eco 3
Total. 99.95


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1TeakTectona Grandis02201777132274
2Terminalia TomentosaSaja01395462104158
3Pterocarpus MarsupiumBija0225184893116
4OthersOthers01821576772382543206
5Millingtonia HortensisKadam/ Haldu04632711317867
Total 0 224999371 2838694 301
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 35703


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : Not Applicable
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : The forest is a vulnerable due to biotic pressure.
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 9.64
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : As per ACF report, Schedule-I Wild-Life animals including Tiger
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : Yes
  Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas : Project location is not part of any NP/ WLS /ESZ. Part of the location falls in low pinch tiger corridor as per WII publication elaborated in part ii in the proposal
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i). Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no District Name VillageArea(in ha.)khasraKML filePresent Owner file
1YavatmalTembhurdara101.02269,274,273,267,254,255,256,268,205,280,279
(ii). Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iii). Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A: (iv). Copy of CA scheme details: (iv). Copy of CA scheme details: NA
Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
NIL

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Nagpur993100.00240111.504262.9879520.9517/06/2022520.952742.74
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
NagpurNagpurDFOYesOne04/04/2022
 Nodal OfficerNoNo Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
NagpurNagpurDFO RecommendedThe project have Schedule I species as well as many other endangered animals and project will affect corridor connectivity between Pench Tiger Reserve and NNTR. However keeping in view project of public interests and site specific , diversion of forest land is recommended Subject to clearance under section 38 OO 1 , g of Wildlife Protection Act 1972. Detailed Site Inspection Note uploaded
NagpurCF RecommendedRecommendedYes
Nodal Officer RecommendedAs the project support infrastructure growth of the country as minerals are the raw material for Steel.
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
MaharashtraState SecretaryRecommended03/08/2023FLD 2022/CR280/F 10, State Govt. OfficerNo Data