PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
MH-0108/2022
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Maharashtra
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Maharashtra
(ii)
District :
Yavatmal
(iii)
Forest Division :
Pandharkawada
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
146.996
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Mining
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Pandharkawada
129.771
Reserved Forest
2
Pandharkawada
17.225
Unclassed Forests
Total
146.996
Division 1. : Pandharkawada
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Yavatmal
146.996
Total
146.996
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
146.996
0.4
Eco 3
Total.
146.996
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Tectona Grandis
Sag
5973
4442
955
204
21
2
2
Adina cordifolia
Haldu
0
0
1
0
0
0
3
Others
Kadamb
95
34
2
9
5
2
4
Others
Dhawda
10552
2145
329
165
55
13
5
Others
Sihana
1551
205
14
4
0
1
6
Others
Movei
58
145
243
65
29
18
7
Others
Bhera
24772
14735
1799
530
79
26
8
Butea Monosperma
Palas
579
573
172
30
8
2
9
Diasporus Melanoxylon
Tendu
8727
4570
422
148
78
46
10
Madhuca indica
Moha
515
536
244
181
127
124
11
Ixora Parviflora
Lokhandi
1643
1348
135
19
4
0
12
Others
Aali
1372
1036
47
15
8
2
13
Others
Doodkonda
67
29
11
1
0
0
14
Others
Paras
2
3
3
1
3
12
15
Others
Char
140
188
46
7
3
0
16
Terminalia Bellarica
Behada
365
456
227
73
10
10
17
Aegle Marmelos
Bel
4
2
2
2
0
0
18
Others
Ghogurli
13
6
6
3
0
0
19
Semecarpus Anacardium
Biba
17
21
2
0
1
0
20
Boswellia Serrata
Salai
0
0
0
2
0
1
21
Others
Dhoban
14
21
13
9
16
10
22
Azadirachta Indica
Nimb
46
61
28
13
11
6
23
Others
Apta
21
4
0
0
0
0
24
Others
Medsing
1
4
1
0
1
0
25
Others
Karei
10
16
3
1
1
0
26
Acacia Catechu
Khair
1
1
0
0
0
0
27
Others
Kawath
23
32
12
4
11
1
28
Others
Kusum
2
7
0
0
2
0
29
Tamarindus Indica
Chinch
0
1
0
1
0
0
30
Others
Aran
207
418
31
2
1
0
31
Others
Kumbhi
205
239
101
20
5
1
32
Acacia leucophloea
Hiwar
38
39
23
10
0
0
33
Others
Charodi
926
935
148
27
3
0
34
Terminalia Tomentosa
Ain
321
225
59
26
2
2
35
Others
Movei
25
123
180
27
11
0
36
Others
Karam
4
1
3
1
0
0
37
Albizia Procera
Chichwa
69
80
59
34
8
7
38
Others
Borya
12
25
1
0
0
0
39
Ficus Religiosa
Pimpal
0
1
1
0
0
0
40
Zizyphus Jujuba
Bor
0
1
0
0
0
0
41
Others
Rohan
614
1001
568
300
129
67
42
Cassia Fistula
Bahawa
634
961
42
7
0
0
43
Lagerstroemia Parviflora
Lendy
6624
2548
378
21
3
5
44
Terminalia Tomentosa
Saja
302
232
104
43
17
1
Total
66544
37450
6415
2005
652
359
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
113425
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
the undulated topography of the forest land involved in the proposed coal block will result in soil erosion following feeling of trees due to biotic pressure especially cattle.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
no
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
Yes
Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas :
this location however is covered under approved tiger conservation plan of tadoba andhari tiger reserved and section 38(o)I (g) of the said act, provides for the tiger conservation plan to ensure ecologicay compitibale land uses in areaa linking one protected areas or tiger reserve with anoother and therefore need to recommandation of NBWL
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
Yes
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i).
Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no
District Name
Village
Area(in ha.)
khasra
KML file
Present Owner file
1
Ratnagiri
Ratambi
148.4123
5/1,5/2,5/3A,5/3B,5/4,5/5,5/6,5/7,5/8,5/9,5/10,5/11,5/12,5/13,5/14,5/15,5/16,5/17,5/18,5/19,5/20,5/21A,5/21B,5/21C,5/21D,5/22,5/23,5/24,5/25, 6/1A,6/1B,6/2,6/3,6/4,6/5,6/6,6/7,6/8,6/9,6/10,6/11,9/1,9/
(ii).
Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iii).
Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
NA
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Yavatmal
1358400
303626
2417.77
27
853.060
30/01/2023
853.060
2355.784
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Pandharkawada
Yavatmal
DFO
Yes
One
04/11/2022
Yavatmal
Yavatmal
CF
Yes
One
04/11/2022
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Pandharkawada
Yavatmal
DFO
Recommended
recomandation are however subject to a clearance under section 38 o , g 1 of wildlife protection act 1972 from NBWL b project should have following mitigation measures 1 No Mining/ No blasting/ No transport allowed from 6 pm to 6 am. 2 Mining lease Boundary falling in corridor section will be fenced with 6 8 feet chain link fencing to avoid incident of trapping of wild life. 3 7.5 meter safety zone around lease boundary within lease area will be developed as green belt for safety of the wild life from dust/noise and vibrations. plantation of additional plants of native species should be resorted to. 4 Separate nursery of samplings of native flora should be created for plantaion of the area on vacant spaces. 5 Control Blasting with minimum duration during day time with keeping records for inspection for the forest staff. 6 water sprinkling during mining/ haul roads and approach road. 7 Strict compliances of mitigation measures suggested in mine Closure Plans, Wild Life Mitigation Plan and conditions of Environment Clearance and NBWL.
Yavatmal
Yavatmal
CF
Recommended
recomandation are however subject to a clearance under section 38 o , g 1 of wildlife protection act 1972 from NBWL b project should have following mitigation measures 1 No Mining/ No blasting/ No transport allowed from 6 pm to 6 am. 2 Mining lease Boundary falling in corridor section will be fenced with 6 8 feet chain link fencing to avoid incident of trapping of wild life. 3 7.5 meter safety zone around lease boundary within lease area will be developed as green belt for safety of the wild life from dust/noise and vibrations. plantation of additional plants of native species should be resorted to. 4 Separate nursery of samplings of native flora should be created for plantaion of the area on vacant spaces. 5 Control Blasting with minimum duration during day time with keeping records for inspection for the forest staff. 6 water sprinkling during mining/ haul roads and approach road. 7 Strict compliances of mitigation measures suggested in mine Closure Plans, Wild Life Mitigation Plan and conditions of Environment Clearance and NBWL.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Recommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Maharashtra
State Secretary
Recommended
03/08/2023
FLD 2323/C.R.179/F 10, Wildlife Clearance will be needed in this proposal
State Govt. Officer
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×