PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : KL-023/2020
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Kerala
 (i) State / Union Territory : Kerala  (ii) District : Idukki  (iii) Forest Division : Mankulam  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 0.04  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Others
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Mankulam0.04Reserved Forest
Total 0.04
Division 1. : Mankulam
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Idukki0.04
Total0.04
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
10.040Eco 6
Total. 0.04


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Others000000
Total 0 00 00 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 0


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : No specific working plan prescription for the area
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : The area proposed is grass land devoid of trees. The area is on top of a grass land and is flat area.the area is less prone to erosion when compared to other areas
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : .03
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : Presence of Nilgiri tahr is observed in this area
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): Yes
  Details of Protected Area and comments on the impact of Project on the ESZ : Since the area proposed for diversion is only 0.04 Ha. and since no major constructions are involved, the impact will be less
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : Yes
  Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas : since the area proposed is 0.04 and since no major contruction proposed,the impact will be less
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : Yes
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: NA (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.: (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority:
Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
NIL

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Idukki43580003930000528.592845462.46927/05/2021462.469290.35
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
MankulamHigh Range Circle, KottayamDFOYesThree19/11/2020,06/02/2021,24/02/2021
 Nodal OfficerNoNo Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
MankulamHigh Range Circle, KottayamDFO RecommendedThis Project proposed by National center of Earth Science, Akkulam Thiruvananthapuram, envisages the use of forest land for the construction of “Geo environmental observatory”, which will serve as a primary data source of several hydrological, geological, agronomical and climate change studies, in the high altitude region of Periyar river basin, at Sankhumalai, Munnar. Since the proposed project requires only 0.04 Ha for the installation of various instruments and the project does not involve major constructions and the proposed project is causing minimum damage to the forest land and the small area proposed may not affect movement of wild animals.
High Range Circle, KottayamCF RecommendedThe site is a ridge with grassland and nearby Anamudy peak and about 2100m above MSL it is ideal for an observatory due to minimum disturbance and connectivity for observation and installation. The project will cause only minimum disturbance and the area required is negligible and is only a research setup with no other disturbance from development envisaged, the proposal is recommended.Yes
Nodal Officer RecommendedGeo Environmental Observatory will serve as a primary data source of several hydrological, geological, agronomical and climate change studies, in the high altitude region of Periyar river basin. The proposed forest land is unavoidable and barest minimum.
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
KeralaState SecretaryRecommended07/05/2024Recommended for Stage I clearanceState Govt. OfficerNo Data