PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
KA-042/2019
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Karnataka
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Karnataka
(ii)
District :
Shimoga,Chikmagalur
(iii)
Forest Division :
Bhadra Wildlife,Bhadravathi
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
89.92
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
School
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Bhadravathi
0
The area (84.98) to be diverted in the proposal is not belongs to Bhadravathi division
2
Bhadra Wildlife
90.04
Protected Forest
Total
90.04
Division 1. : Bhadra Wildlife
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Chikmagalur
28.14
2
Shimoga
61.9
Total
90.04
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
90.04
0.6
Eco 1
Total.
90.04
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Acacia Ariciloformis
Acacia
111
400
169
91
29
0
2
Adina cordifolia
Ettega
1
4
4
4
2
0
3
Albezzia Labbeck
Baage
0
4
2
0
0
0
4
Alstonia Scholaris
Haale
381
475
95
29
1
28
5
Anacardium Occidentale
Godambi
2
6
4
1
0
0
6
Albzzia Spp.
A. odoratissima bilvaramara
0
8
12
6
4
0
7
Aegle Marmelos
Bilva pathre
0
8
12
6
4
0
8
Anacardium Occidentale
Godambi
2
6
4
1
0
0
9
Annona Reticulata
rampala
0
2
0
0
0
9
10
Anthocephalus Cadamba
Kadamba
0
2
0
0
0
4
11
Anona Squamosa
Sitapala
4
3
0
0
0
10
12
Artocarpus Heterophyllus
Halasu
3
13
21
11
2
5
13
Azadirachta Indica
bevu
22
38
13
5
2
0
14
Bamboo
bamboo
9
0
0
0
0
0
15
Bombax Ceiba
Buruga
2
15
18
4
4
10
16
Butea Monosperma
muttuga
6
44
36
15
6
0
17
Cassia Fistula
Kakke Mara
32
94
42
14
7
0
18
Cassia Siamea
Simethangadi
9
68
61
32
6
0
19
Casurina Equisitifolia
Gaali mara
0
0
1
0
0
1
20
Cinnamomum Zeylanicum
Dalchini
3
5
1
0
0
0
21
Dalbergia Latifolia
Beete
104
322
115
28
4
0
22
Delonix Regia
Gulmohar
17
74
78
47
23
3
23
Eucalyptus spp
Eucalyptus
45
397
476
201
56
0
24
Ficus benghalensis
Alada mara
2
0
0
0
4
1
25
Gliricidia Maculata
Gobbarada mara
5
9
1
0
0
0
26
Gmelina Arborea
Shivane
3
7
13
7
0
3
27
Grewia Tiliaefolia
Dadasalu
0
1
5
0
0
0
28
Hardwickia Binnata
tadasalu
3
20
21
6
1
55
29
Jacaranda Mimosifolia
Jakaranda
1
7
1
1
0
2
30
Lagistromia Lanceolata
Nandi
6
122
113
62
24
6
31
Mammea Longifolia
hippa
5
3
4
2
0
2
32
Mangifera Indica
Maavu
4
36
12
8
5
1
33
Melia Azadirachta
Kaadu Bevu
1
26
32
4
1
5
34
Michelia Champaka
Champaka
11
26
8
1
1
0
35
Mimusops Elengi
Bakula
3
6
2
0
0
3
36
Phyllanthus Emblica
nelli
4
16
2
0
0
0
37
Polyainthia Pendula
False Ashoka
49
77
35
20
3
0
38
Pongamia Pinnata
Honge
43
93
69
28
11
5
39
Prosophis Juliflora
Jalli
0
7
1
0
0
1
40
Prosophis Spicigera
Banni mara
0
7
0
2
0
2
41
Psidium Guajava
Seebe
20
17
0
0
0
0
42
Pterocarpus Marsupium
Honne
7
63
66
33
9
5
43
Samania Saman
Rain Tree
2
15
29
23
5
20
44
Santalum Album
Sandal
1120
299
6
1
0
0
45
Sweitinia Mahagony
Mahagani
2
7
7
0
0
1
46
Syzigium Cumini
Nerale
26
171
43
24
6
2
47
Syzigium Jambous
Pannerale
3
5
1
0
0
0
48
Tamarindus Indica
HUnase mara
6
26
15
9
2
10
49
Tectona Grandis
Teak
276
1052
612
140
21
15
50
Terminalia Arjuna
Bili Mathi
1
14
14
5
1
3
51
Terminalia Bellarica
Thare
3
13
18
8
4
4
52
Terminalia Catappa
Kadu Badami
1
7
7
4
0
0
53
Terminalia Paniculata
Hunalu
185
1854
2154
1023
330
143
54
Vateria Indica
Dupa
2
5
0
0
0
0
55
Xylia Xylocarpa
Jambe
582
1063
321
48
12
4
56
Lagistromia Lanceolata
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
3129
7062
4776
1954
590
363
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
17874
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
The area comes under Bhadra Tiger Reserve
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
Nil
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Tiger, Leopard, Osprey, Malabar pied, Hornbill, Yellow footed pigion, white rumped shama, Spotted deer, Sambar deer, Wild boar
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
Yes
Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas :
No much impact on the movement of wildlife as it is on the boarder of the Wildlife.
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
Yes
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
No
S.No.
Component
Forest Area(in ha.)
NO Data
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
Yes
(a)Details of violation(s):
Felling, construction of buildings
(b) Period of Work done(year) :
20
(c) Area of forest land involved in violation (in ha.) :
84.98
S. No.
Name of person responsible for violation
Designation & Address of person responsible for violation
Action taken against the person responsible for violation
1
R Shantaraju
Registrar, Kuvempu Univefrsity SHankaragatta
No
2
M. Manjunath Naika
Registrar, KUS
No
3
Prof . ABdul Rahiman
Registrar, KUS
No
4
Preveen Chandra IFS
Registrar
No
5
Prof. B. S. Sherigar
Registrar, KUS
No
6
Prof. S. A. Bari
Registrar, KUS
No
7
SHivanna IFS
Registrar, KUS
NO
8
Prof. P Vasudeva Naik
Registrar, KUS
No
9
Uday Kumar IFS
Registrar, KUS
No
10
A. M. Kunjappa
Registrar, KUS
No
11
Prof. J. S Sadananda
Registrar, KUS
NO
12
prof. M. Basavaraj
Registrar, KUS
No
13
Prof Krishnappa
Registrar, KUS
No
14
Prof. T. R Manjunath
Registrar, KUS
NO
15
Prof. A. Ramegowda
Registrar, KUS
NO
16
Prof. Mallika S. Ghanti
Registrar, KUS
NO
17
Prof. H. S Bojya Naik
Registrar, KUS
NO
18
Prof. J, Somashekar
Registrar, KUS
NO
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
No
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i).
Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no
District Name
Village
Area(in ha.)
khasra
KML file
Present Owner file
1
Chikmagalur
Kesavinamane
356.05
38, 39, 40, 45, 46, 49
2
Chikmagalur
Tigada
28.65
13
(ii).
Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iii).
Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
NA
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
NIL
Division 2. : Bhadravathi
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(in ha.)
NIL
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
NIL
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
NIL
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The mentioned Sy. No. Area (84.98 ha ) to be diverted in the proposal is not belongs to the Bhadravathi division.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
The mentioned Sy. No. Area (84.98 ha ) to be diverted in the proposal is not belongs to the Bhadravathi division.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
Yes
(a)Details of violation(s):
NIL
(b) Period of Work done(year) :
2019
(c) Area of forest land involved in violation (in ha.) :
0.9799
S. No.
Name of person responsible for violation
Designation & Address of person responsible for violation
Action taken against the person responsible for violation
1
Basavarajappa
Principal Morarji Desai Residential School Kadadakatte Bhadravathi
FOC has been registered and case is enquiry stage
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
No
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i).
Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no
District Name
Village
Area(in ha.)
khasra
KML file
Present Owner file
1
Chikmagalur
Kesavinamane
356.05
38, 39, 40, 45, 46, 49
2
Chikmagalur
Tigada
28.65
13
(ii).
Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iii).
Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
NA
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
NIL
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Chikmagalur
720200
210862
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Bhadra Wildlife
Chikkamagalur
DFO
Yes
One
21/05/2021
Bhadravathi
Shimoga
DFO
Yes
One
15/06/2021
Shimoga
CF
No
No Data
Chikkamagalur
CF
Yes
One
21/05/2021
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Bhadra Wildlife
Chikkamagalur
DFO
Recommended
Area to be diverted is on the border of wildlife area. Part of the construction is already completed or in progress. The area is required by the user agency for the Establishment of University.
Bhadravathi
Shimoga
DFO
Recommended
as mentioned in the report
Shimoga
CF
Recommended
The proposed area does not belong to Shivamogga Forest Circle
Yes
Chikkamagalur
CF
Recommended
Area to be diverted is on the border of wildlife area. Part of the construction is already completed or in progress. The area is required by the user agency for the Establishment of University.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
recommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Karnataka
State Secretary
Recommended
27/10/2021
Stage I Approval
State Govt. Officer
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×