PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : KA-057/2017
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Karnataka
 (i) State / Union Territory : Karnataka  (ii) District : Kodagu  (iii) Forest Division : Virajapet  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 22.8  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Rehabilitation
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Virajapet22.8Reserved Forest
Total 22.8
Division 1. : Virajapet
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Kodagu22.8
Total22.8
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
122.880Eco 1
Total. 22.8


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Terminalia Tomentosamatti0115191196188
2Pterocarpus Marsupiumhonne 003144982
3Lagistromia LanceolataNandi 0004650
4Tectona GrandisThega03111372161
5Terminalia bellericaThari 001112533
6Grewia TiliaefoliaThadasalu 00062020
7Terminalia PaniculataUluve Matti 0129239
8Sweitinia MahagonyMahagani 00041014
9Gmelina ArboreaKumbali 0001715
10Syzigium CuminiNerale002216
11Dalbergia LatifoliaBete0031742
12Mangifera IndicaMavu000003
13Bombax CeibaBuruga000122
14Artocarpus HirsutaHebbalasu000001
15Ficus MysorensisGoli000001
16Michelia Champakasampige000002
17Pongamia PinnataHonnge000120
18Cassia FistulaKakke001000
19Cinnamomum ZeylanicumDalchinni000100
20Ailanthus excelsaBende000010
21Othersgodda003555557
22Otherskadu jathi0511382729
23Otherskulir mavu0001228
24Othersbalanji0114827106
25Othersmalali0023619
26Othersnaviladi 0001824
27Othersuadi 000341
28Othersbasavanapada000552
29OthersKadalu000003
30Othersbasari 000002
31Otherschatuva01448201
32Othersmiyaspesis 010000
33Othersatthi 001412
34OthersKesiya002000
35Othersdindale0041691
36Otherssagade000010
37Chukrasia TabularisKaradi 0001033
Total 0 64259 490490 637
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 1940


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : NIL
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : High
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : Tiger, leopard, Wild dog, Elephant, Chital, Sambar.
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : Yes
  Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas : Negligible as the area is a fragmented patch of Maukal RF and is surrounded by Coffee estates on three sides and bounded by a public road on the fourth side.
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): Yes
  Details of Protected Area and comments on the impact of Project on the ESZ : Negligible. The proposed area is a fragmented patch of Maukal RF and is required for rehabilitation of tribals from interior parts of Nagarhole TR.
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : Yes
  Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas : Negligible. The proposed area is a fragmented patch of Maukal RF and is required for rehabilitation of tribals from interior parts of Nagarhole TR.
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : Yes
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
NO Data

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
NIL

S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
NO Data
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
VirajapetKodaguDFOYesOne12/07/2017
 KodaguCFYesOne05/09/2017
 Nodal OfficerNoNo Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
VirajapetKodaguDFO RecommendedThe proposed project area is needed for relocation / rehabilitation of tribal families living in interior forest areas of Nagarahole Tiger Reserve. The benefits of the project outweigh any damage to Mavukal RF by removal of 1940 trees from the proposed 22.8 Ha, the project may be allowed. The 22.8 Ha of Mavukal Reserve Forest requested by the User Agency towards providing land for rehabilitation of tribals from Nagarhole Tiger Reserve is recommended for diversion.
KodaguCF RecommendedThe proposed project area is needed for relocation / rehabilitation of tribal families living in interior forest areas of Nagarahole Tiger Reserve. Yes
Nodal Officer Recommended