View Form A Part II

PART-II

(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)

State Serial No. of proposal : KA-017/2021

1. Location of the project/Scheme : Karnataka

(i) State / Union Territory : Karnataka (ii) District : Uttara Kannada (iii) Forest Division : Sirsi (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 1.97 (v)

Category of the Proposal: Quarrying

2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion

S. No.	Division	Forest Land(ha.)	Legal Status
1	Sirsi	1.97	Reserved Forest
Total		1.97

Division 1. : Sirsi

3. District wise area to be diverted in the division

S. No.	District	Area(ha.)
1	Uttara Kannada	1.97
Total		1.97

4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion

(i) Density of vegetation

S. No.	Area(in ha.)	Density	Eco-Class
1	1.97	5	Eco 1
Total.	1.97

(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL

S. No.	Scientific Name	Local Name	(0-30)cm.	(31-60)cm.	(61-90)cm.	(91-120)cm.	(121-150)cm.	(>150)cm.
1	Acacia Auricuiformis	acacia	5	3	0	0	0	0
2	Others	Adacheri	57	17	0	0	0	0
3	Terminalia Chebula	Alale	39	44	2	1	0	0
4	Others	Andamurugal	6	10	2	0	0	0
5	Others	Basari	1	1	0	0	0	0
6	Dalburgia Sisoo	Beete	2	2	1	0	0	0
7	Others	Bilisarale	2	1	0	0	0	0
8	Caryota Urens	Bagani	0	3	1	0	0	0
9	Others	Booruga	0	3	1	0	0	0
10	Others	Challe	142	41	3	1	0	0
11	Cinnamomum Zeylanicum	Dalchinni	11	8	1	0	0	0
12	Others	Gomble	0	2	0	0	0	0
13	Others	Gorabale	1	0	0	0	0	0
14	Others	Hanageri	8	2	0	0	0	0
15	Artocarpus Hirsuta	Hebbalasu	0	1	0	0	0	0
16	Others	Holageri	29	6	0	0	0	0
17	Pterocarpus Marsupium	Honne	2	7	6	3	1	0
18	Others	Higa	10	0	0	0	0	0
19	Others	Jumma	0	1	0	0	0	0
20	Others	Jungli	88	34	1	1	0	1
21	Others	Kadamba	1	0	0	0	0	0
22	Others	Kadu Amate	1	0	0	0	0	0
23	Others	Kakke	1	1	0	0	0	0
24	Others	Kangilu	3	4	4	1	0	0
25	Others	Kare	119	12	1	0	0	0
26	Others	Kavalu	60	29	5	0	0	0
27	Terminalia Paniculata	Kindala	15	6	2	0	0	0
28	Others	Kunneralu	52	14	1	1	1	0
29	Others	Mashe	1	7	4	0	0	0
30	Terminalia Tomentosa	Matti	48	52	17	0	0	0
31	Mangifera Indica	Mavu	0	1	0	0	0	0
32	Garcinia Indica	Murugalu	3	1	1	0	0	0
33	Lagistromia Lanceolata	Nandi	0	1	0	0	0	0
34	embelica officinalis	Nalelli	17	2	0	0	0	0
35	Syzigium Cumini	Nerlalu	30	8	6	2	1	0
36	Others	Nurkal	92	43	0	0	0	0
37	Others	Patte Patte	14	0	0	0	0	0
38	Mimusops Elengi	Ranjalu	3	1	0	0	0	0
39	Others	Bobbe	2	1	0	0	0	0
40	Ailantus Excelra	Saldupa	1	0	0	0	0	0
41	Others	Vayu Vidanga	1	0	0	0	0	0
42	Terminalia Bellarica	Tare	1	0	0	0	0	0
43	Others	Mullu Hannu Gida	1	1	0	0	0	0
44	Others	Gurgi	5	1	0	0	0	0
45	Others	Kadu balli	1	0	0	0	0	0
46	Others	Hannu Sampige	5	0	0	0	0	0
47	Others	Kadu Mallige	1	0	0	0	0	0
48	Others	Gojjalu	1	0	0	0	0	0
49	Others	Navi Ladi	2	0	0	0	0	0
Total			884	371	59	10	3	1
Sub Total (No of Trees.)			1328

5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : NIL

6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : Since the proposed the area has low to moderate slope erosion can only be expected during heavy rains.

7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0

8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view

(i).

Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : Snakes, Spotted deer, Fox, Mouse Deer Etc.

(ii).

Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No

(iii).

Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No

(iv).

Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No

(v).

Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No

9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any

(i).

Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No

10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion

(i).

Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes

11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed

(i).

Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No

12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL

13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme

(i). Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA

Patch Wise Details
S.no	District Name	Village	Area(in ha.)	khasra	KML file	Present Owner file
1	Uttara Kannada	MUNDAGANAMANE & MANADOOR	1.97	215 & 38

(ii). Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:

(iii). Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:

(iv). Copy of CA scheme details:

(iv). Copy of CA scheme details: NA

Additional information Details

S. No.	Documents	Remarks
1		Covering letter

14. District Profile

S.no	District Name	Geographical area of the district (in ha.)	Forest area of the district (in ha.)	Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)	No. of Approved Cases	Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)	Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)	A) Forest land (in ha.)	B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1	Uttara Kannada	1029100	829645.60	70.1685	27	378.39	31/08/2021	378.39	0

15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land

Division Name	Circle	Site inspected By	Whether site inspected	No. of times site visited	Site inspection report	Date of visit
Sirsi	Kanara	DFO	Yes	One		14/07/2021
		Nodal Officer	No		No Data

(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))

16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason

Division	Circle	Recommendation By	Recommendation	Reason	Whether CF agreed
Sirsi	Kanara	DFO	Recommended	The user agency has established stone crusher in Manjuguni village Sy.No 52/2 of Janmane Range, Sirsi Taluk, Uttar Kannada District. As such the user agency intended to have the forest land at F.Sy.No 61 of Khurse village, Sampakhanda Hobli, Sirsi Taluk, Uttar Kannada District for ordinary building stone quarry purpose on lease basis, for a period of 15 years. Hence the diversion of forest land of 1.97 ha can be considered in accordance with provision of Forest Conservation Act.
	Kanara	CF	Recommended	The user agency has established stone crusher in Manjuguni village Sy.No 52/2 of Janmane Range, Sirsi Taluk, Uttar Kannada District. As such the user agency intended to have the forest land at F.Sy.No 61 of Khurse village, Sampakhanda Hobli, Sirsi Taluk, Uttar Kannada District for ordinary building stone quarry purpose on lease basis, for a period of 15 years. Hence the diversion of forest land of 1.97 ha can be considered in accordance with provision of Forest Conservation Act.	Yes
		Nodal Officer	Not-Recommended	the User Agency has proposed unbroken forest land for quarry purpose, while there are number of broken up areas already available in the district. moreover the proposed area has 1328 trees and breaking of high density forest for buidling stone quarry is not a site specific activity.