PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
KA-072/2021
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Karnataka
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Karnataka
(ii)
District :
Mangalore
(iii)
Forest Division :
Mangalore
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
0.9737
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Quarrying
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Mangalore
0.9737
Reserved Forest
Total
0.9737
Division 1. : Mangalore
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Mangalore
0.9737
Total
0.9737
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
0.9737
0.4
Eco 3
Total.
0.9737
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Others
Puruli
1
0
1
0
0
0
2
Others
Kanapade
1
3
2
0
0
0
3
Terminalia Paniculata
Maruva
3
2
0
0
0
0
4
Adina cordifolia
Anavu
0
0
1
0
0
0
5
Dalbergia Latifolia
Beete
0
1
0
0
0
0
6
Holoptelia integrifolia
Ravubeja
0
1
0
0
0
0
7
Terminalia Tomentosa
Banpu
4
2
0
0
0
0
8
Others
Andipunar
2
0
4
0
0
0
9
Grewia Tiliaefolia
Daddal
1
2
1
0
0
0
10
Acacia Auriculiformis
Hybrid Acacia
0
7
3
0
0
0
11
Others
Sarali
1
2
0
0
0
0
12
Anacardium Occidentale
Cashew
2
7
2
1
0
0
13
Others
Manigium
0
1
0
0
0
0
14
Albizzia lebbeck
Kalbage
0
0
1
0
0
0
Total
15
28
15
1
0
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
59
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
No Data
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The forest if not vulnerable to erossion.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Wild bore are found in the area
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
NA
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority:
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
NIL
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Mangalore
420860.87
113398.69
153.818
32
143.37
12/02/2024
138.50
11.98
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Mangalore
Mangalore
DFO
Yes
One
12/12/2023
Mangalore
CF
Yes
One
06/08/2024
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Mangalore
Mangalore
DFO
Not-Recommended
The project is for the purpose of carrying out building stone qyarrying passing through Rserve Forest of Bnatwal Range of Mangaluru Forest Division in favour of Mervyn M Goveas , Kankanady post nar Indira Hospital, Mangaluru. the proposed project area is identified at the edge of the reserve forest land and approximately 4.600 km by air from the Karinjeshwar Temple and the national park is 26.500 km by air form the project area, in view of the objections received from Karnataka Cashew Development Corporation, the proposal may not be recomended under FC Act 1980.
Mangalore
CF
Not-Recommended
The area proposed for quarrying purpose is Surrounded by Government School Aerial distance &ndash 463 mtr , Houses, Temples and Community Health center and locals have expressed their strong opposition to this project. Hence, the proposal may not be considered under forest Conservation Act 1980.
No
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×