PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : KA-078/2017
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Karnataka
 (i) State / Union Territory : Karnataka  (ii) District : Belgaum  (iii) Forest Division : Gokak  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 0.502  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Others
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Gokak0.502Reserved Forest
Total 0.502
Division 1. : Gokak
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Belgaum0.502
Total0.502
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
10.5020Eco 4
Total. 0.502


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
NIL
5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : NIL
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : Due to hard soil and low gradient and poor rainfall, not vulnerable to soil erosion
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0.10
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : No wildlife present in and around the forest land
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: NA (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.: (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority:
Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 Checklist
2 checklist
3 letter
4 checklist
5 Form-A
6 DC certificate of no alternative suitable land
7 Contour map
8 No violation certificate by user agency
9 Cost benefit analysis
10 Certificate of bearing CA charges by user agency
11 Certificate of no mining work by user agency
12 certificate of FRA by user agency
13 Forma A
14 Certificate of FRA by user agency
15 Topo map
16 RTC of sy no 62
17 Part II
18 DCF certificate of not effecting monuments and national park
19 Inspection report and bearest minimum certificate by DCF
20 FRA certificate by Gram panchayat
21 FRA certificate by Gram Panchayat
22 checklist
23 Forma A
24 Area statement
25 Brief Report2
26 Brief Report2
27 RTC of sy no. 67
28 Part II of Checklist
29 Certificate of no growth of tree by DCF
30 FRA certificate from RFO countersigned by DCF
31 FRA certificate from Gram Panchayat
32 FRA certificate by Gram Panchayat
33 FRA certificate by Deputy Conservator of Forests
34 checklist
35 Certificate of FRA by user agency
36 Google imagery map
37 Part II
38 FRA certificate by Gram Panchayat
39 Foram A
40 Form A
41 Form A
42 Non availability of no alternative land by user agency
43 Index map
44 Certificate of bearing cost of exploitation of trees
45 contour map
46 Brief report1
47 Certificate of no violation by DCF
48 Certificate of enclosing of enclosures
49 FRA Certificate by Gram Panchayat
50 FRA certificate by Deputy Commissioner
51 Certificate of undertaking for bearing NPV by user agency
52 Site inspection report by DCF
53 FRA certificate from Gram panchayat

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Belgaum134150047160.744408.07192216.0811/10/201715.96510.68
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
GokakBelgaumDFOYesOne04/10/2017
 BelgaumCFYesOne16/10/2017
 Nodal OfficerNoNo Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
GokakBelgaumDFO RecommendedRecommended as the concept is environment friendly
BelgaumCF RecommendedRecommendation of the DCF Gokak may be acceptedYes
Nodal Officer RecommendedSubmitted for appropriate decision regarding diversion of 0.502 ha of forest land in Sy. No. 62 & 67 of Doddamangadi Village, Ramdurga Taluk, Belgaum District for establishment of Shiva Statue and Sai Temple in Forest Department Tree Park in favour of the President, Shiva Prathishtana Seva Samithi, Ramdurga under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 subject to the conditions appended in Annexure ‘A’.