PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : KA-092/2022
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Karnataka
 (i) State / Union Territory : Karnataka  (ii) District : Chikmagalur  (iii) Forest Division : Koppa  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 0.1004  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Optical Fibre Cable
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Koppa0.0577Reserved Forest
2Koppa0.0166Section 4
Total 0.0743
Division 1. : Koppa
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Chikmagalur0.1232
Total0.1232
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
10.12320.7Eco 1
Total. 0.1232


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Acacia Ariciloformis0000000
Total 0 00 00 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 0


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : The Working plan for the year 2024-25 to 2033-34 is under consideration but the working plan expired doesn not have any such prescription.
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : The Proposed land is having gentle slope and area identifed is along the road where there is no scope of much erosion
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : Indian guar, muntjak, deer etc
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): Yes
  Details of Protected Area and comments on the impact of Project on the ESZ : The Proposed area is all along the road and is underground cable installation project hence there is no impact on ESZ.
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : Yes
  Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas : The Proposed area is all along the road and is underground cable installation project hence there is no impact on widlife.
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: NA (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.: (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority:
Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 Recommended

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Chikmagalur720100307656.00179.039100.7931/08/202498.792.00
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
KoppaChikkamagalurDFOYesOne22/07/2024
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
KoppaChikkamagalurDFO RecommendedThis project involves laying of Underground OFC Cable, and requires forest area of 0.1232 Ha to be diverted. The proposed project Starts from Sy No 183 of Samse Village, Kalasa taluk and passes through various Sy No’s of Samse and Mavinakere Villages of Kalasa Taluk and ends at Sy No 1 of Mavinakere village, Kalasa taluk Comprises Resereve forest, Section 4 Notified forest and Deemed Forest area of Kalasa Range Koppa Forest Division. This project is a linear project and does not involve felling of trees. This project is for providing latest communication network to the public. Hence the “Online proposal No FP/KA/OFC/153126/2022 submitted by the User Agency V.V Babu, DGM,CEO, jio Digital Fibre Private Limited, Bengaluru” is recommended to be considered for diversion of the Forest Land.
ChikkamagalurCF RecommendedThe proposal was accepted by the Nodal Officer and inspected by the Deputy Conservator of Forests, Koppa Division, Koppa. The report of the Deputy Conservator of Forests may be accepted. Yes