PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
JH-065/2019
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Jharkhand
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Jharkhand
(ii)
District :
Bokaro
(iii)
Forest Division :
Bokaro
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
34.739
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Transmission Line
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Bokaro
4.298
Protected Forest
2
Bokaro
30.441
jungle-jhari land
Total
34.739
Division 1. : Bokaro
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Bokaro
34.739
Total
34.739
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
34.739
0.6
Eco 3
Total.
34.739
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Abies Alba
BARGAD
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
Azadirachta Indica
NEEM
0
11
6
3
0
3
3
Bambusa Vulgaris
KHAJUR
0
0
0
0
0
1
4
Aegle Marmelos
BEL
0
0
1
1
1
0
5
Ficus Religiosa
PIPAL
0
0
1
2
0
1
6
Betula Cylindrostachys
PALASH
0
174
267
105
27
12
7
Alberia Lebbac (Dirshanam)
SIRISH
0
5
3
2
0
0
8
Adatoda Vasica
SIMAR
0
4
5
1
1
3
9
Acacia Arabica
DOKA
0
0
1
1
0
0
10
Madhuca indica
MAHUA
0
1
0
0
2
9
11
Mangifera Indica
MANGO
0
0
3
0
0
1
12
Dalburgia Sisoo
SEESAM
0
4
2
2
3
0
13
Syzigium Cumini
JAMUN
0
2
0
0
0
1
14
Bambusa Vulgaris
KARANJ
0
0
2
0
1
1
15
Diasporus Melanoxylon
KEND
0
1
1
0
1
0
16
Others
GULAR ,PYAR ,HARRE & OTHERS
0
18
16
4
1
3
17
Teak
SAGOON
0
6
4
2
1
0
18
Ficus Racemosa
DUMAR
0
3
2
1
0
0
19
Others
KORIA
0
13
5
1
0
0
20
Others
BANDOR LORI
0
3
0
0
0
0
21
Alangium Lamarckit
DELA
0
16
5
3
1
0
22
Alstonia Scholaris
KARAMDAR
0
2
2
0
0
0
23
Spathodia Campanulata
AMRA
0
5
3
1
1
0
24
Aegle Marmelos
SIDHA
0
55
6
2
0
1
Total
0
323
335
131
40
37
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
866
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NIL
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
THE ENTIRE STRETCH OF FOREST LAND THROUGH WHICH THE TRANSMISSION LINE PASSES IS OF UNDULATING LANDSCAPE , IN SOME PLACES IT IS HILLY SLOPE AND IS HIGHLY VULNERABLE TO SOIL EROSION
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
SNAKE, HYAENA, JACKAL, etc.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
138.93179
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
19.478
CHEPO
GIRIDIH FOREST RANGE
26 & 46
View file
2
2
50.00
FATEHPUR
GAWAN FOREST RANGE
6,5,7 & 10
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Part-II attached.
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Bokaro
286100
54393
1672.069
38
3802.71
13/02/2020
4481.37
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Bokaro
Bokaro
DFO
Yes
One
29/02/2020
Bokaro
CF
No
No Data
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Bokaro
Bokaro
DFO
Recommended
As per the tree enumeration list around 866 trees are to be cut. But my recommendation would be that none of the trees should be cut as the proposed patches of protected forest are very compact parts of wilderness harboring many species of flora and fauna, moreover it would lead to fragmentation of compact patches of forest. However, trees may be removed where the transmission towers would be installed.
Bokaro
CF
Recommended
Agree with Justification given by the DFO.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Recommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Jharkhand
State Secretary
Recommended
31/05/2021
Recommended
State Govt. Officer
No Data
17.
Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional Office
Recommendation By
MoEF File No.
Date of Stage-I Clearance
Clearance Letter
Ranchi
Regional Office
FP/JH/TRANS/40558/2019
21/03/2022
18.
Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.
Application No.
Total Amount (Rs.)
Recieved Amount (Rs.)
Transaction Date
Transaction ID
Bank Name
Mode of Payment
Demmand Generated By User Agency
Demmand Verified By Nodal Officer
Uploaded Demand Letter
FP/JH/TRANS/40558/2019
TRANS405582019064
88,043,057.00
88,043,057.00
01/10/2022
735750
Union Bank Of India
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
10/08/2022
12/08/2022
FP/JH/TRANS/40558/2019
TRANS405582019933
4,806,180.00
4,806,180.00
15/12/2022
818219
Union Bank Of India
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
14/12/2022
14/12/2022
FP/JH/TRANS/40558/2019
TRANS405582019721
6,458,820.00
6,458,820.00
22/10/2024
BKIDA24296811218
Union Bank Of India
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
23/09/2024
21/10/2024
23.
Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.
Date of Stage-II Clearance
Proposal Status
Clearance Letter
FP/JH/TRANS/40558/2019
Approved In-Principle
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×