View Form A Part II

PART-II

(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)

State Serial No. of proposal : JH-026/2018

1. Location of the project/Scheme : Jharkhand

(i) State / Union Territory : Jharkhand (ii) District : Deoghar,Giridih (iii) Forest Division : Deoghar,Giridih (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 53.7504 (v)

Category of the Proposal: Transmission Line

2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion

S. No.	Division	Forest Land(ha.)	Legal Status
1	Deoghar	8.3909	Protected Forest
2	Deoghar	4.5705	jungle-jhari land
3	Giridih	14.169	Protected Forest
4	Giridih	26.62	jungle-jhari land
Total		53.7504

Division 1. : Deoghar

3. District wise area to be diverted in the division

S. No.	District	Area(ha.)
1	Deoghar	12.9614
Total		12.9614

4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion

(i) Density of vegetation

S. No.	Area(in ha.)	Density	Eco-Class
1	12.9614	0.4	Eco 3
Total.	12.9614

(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL

S. No.	Scientific Name	Local Name	(0-30)cm.	(31-60)cm.	(61-90)cm.	(91-120)cm.	(121-150)cm.	(>150)cm.
1	Others	Amra	0	1	2	1	0	0
2	Bamboo	Bamboo	15	0	0	0	0	0
3	Melia Azadirachta	Bakain	0	0	0	0	1	0
4	Others	Ber	0	0	0	0	1	0
5	Others	Chahar	0	2	0	0	0	0
6	Others	Babool	0	3	0	1	1	0
7	Others	Jogo Dumur	0	0	1	0	0	0
8	Others	Karanj	0	0	0	0	1	0
9	Mangifera Indica	Mango	0	1	1	0	3	0
10	Mammea Longifolia	Mahua	0	1	1	1	3	0
11	Azadirachta Indica	Neem	0	13	2	0	1	0
12	Butea Monosperma	Palash	0	84	88	24	22	0
13	Ficus Religiosa	Peepal	0	0	0	0	1	0
14	Gmelina Aroborea	Gamhar	0	3	2	0	0	0
15	Others	Karam	0	1	0	0	0	0
16	Shorea Robusta	Sal	0	0	0	0	3	0
17	Others	Khajur	0	3	77	46	7	0
18	Others	Palm	0	0	0	8	24	0
Total			15	112	174	81	68	0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)			450

5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : NIL

6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : The proposed area is prone to erosion.

7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0

8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view

(i).

Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : 1.Macaca fascicularis. 2. Erethizon dorsub. 3. sus scrofa. 4. Naza naza. 5. Python molurus. 6. Felis chuas. 7. Lepus areticus. 8. Funambulus palmarum. 9. Acridotheres tristis. 10. Crocuta crocuta

(ii).

Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No

(iii).

Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No

(iv).

Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No

(v).

Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No

9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any

(i).

Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No

10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion

(i).

Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes

11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed

(i).

Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : Yes

(a)Details of violation(s): All the Transmission towers have already been laid

(b) Period of Work done(year) : 1

(c) Area of forest land involved in violation (in ha.) : 12.9614

S. No.	Name of person responsible for violation	Designation & Address of person responsible for violation	Action taken against the person responsible for violation
1	Sri Sanjeev Kumar Burnawal	Electrical Superintending Engineer JUSNL Transmission Circle Deoghar	The violation has been reported to the Conservator of Forest and District level Three Member Committee

12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : Yes

13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme

Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)

(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 5078097

Patch Wise Details
S.no	Patch No.	Area(ha.)	Name of PF/RF	Range	Compartment No	Uploaded KML file of patch
1	1	25.93	Bhatubari	Madhupur Soil Conservation	Plot no 323, 320, 322, 339	View file

(ii). Copy of CA scheme details:

(iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:

(iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:

(V).

Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details

S. No.	Documents	Remarks
1
2
3
4
5

Division 2. : Giridih

3. District wise area to be diverted in the division

S. No.	District	Area(ha.)
1	Giridih	40.789
Total		40.789

4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion

(i) Density of vegetation

S. No.	Area(in ha.)	Density	Eco-Class
1	40.789	0.4	Eco 3
Total.	40.789

(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL

S. No.	Scientific Name	Local Name	(0-30)cm.	(31-60)cm.	(61-90)cm.	(91-120)cm.	(121-150)cm.	(>150)cm.
1	Acacia Ariciloformis	ACACIA	0	157	94	28	8	0
2	Others	BAKLER	0	1	1	0	0	0
3	Babul	BABUL	0	8	2	0	0	0
4	Ficus benghalensis	BANIYAN	0	0	0	0	2	0
5	Zizyphus Jujuba	BER	0	1	0	0	0	0
6	Tectona Grandis	CHAHAR	0	3	3	1	1	0
7	Others	CHALTA	0	0	3	0	0	0
8	Alstonia Scholaris	CHHATIM	0	0	0	0	1	0
9	Others	CHORLA	0	0	0	0	1	0
10	Ficus Racemosa	DUMAR	0	0	2	0	2	0
11	Gmelin Arborea	GAMAHAR	0	1	0	0	0	0
12	Syzigium Cumini	JAMUN	0	9	11	2	3	0
13	Artocarpus Heterophyllus	JACKFRUIT	0	0	3	0	3	0
14	Others	JIOL	0	7	7	1	0	0
15	Others	KARANJ	0	5	5	4	6	0
16	Others	KHAJUR	0	0	65	40	1	0
17	Others	KANCHAN	0	1	2	1	0	0
18	Mangifera Indica	MANGO	0	3	19	6	18	0
19	Mammea Longifolia	MAHUWA	0	6	9	1	14	0
20	Azadirachta Indica	NEEM	0	11	19	4	0	0
21	Butea Monosperma	PALAS	0	112	68	23	10	0
22	Ficus Religiosa	PEEPAL	0	0	1	0	4	0
23	Others	PALM	0	0	0	0	1	0
24	Shorea Robusta	SAL	0	107	77	2	3	0
25	Others	SAWRA	0	1	2	0	0	0
26	Moringa oleifera	SHAJAN	0	1	0	0	0	0
27	Bombax Ceiba	SEMAL	0	2	0	0	0	0
28	Alberia Lebbac (Dirshanam)	SIRISH	0	1	4	0	0	0
29	Others	SONAJHURI	0	1	0	1	1	0
30	Eucalyptus	EUCALYPTUS	0	35	52	29	5	0
31	Dalburgia Sisoo	SISAM	0	1	2	0	1	0
32	Bamboo	BAMBOO	0	0	0	0	0	0
Total			0	474	451	143	85	0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)			1153

5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : PROTECTION WORKING CIRCLE.

6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : Some portion of the proposed forest land is blank and vulnerable to soil erosion.

7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0

8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view

(i).

Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : snake, hare, jackal etc.

(ii).

Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No

(iii).

(iv).

(v).

Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No

9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any

(i).

Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No

10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion

(i).

Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes

11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed

(i).

Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No

12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL

13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme

Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)

(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 13171784.00

Patch Wise Details
S.no	Patch No.	Area(ha.)	Name of PF/RF	Range	Compartment No	Uploaded KML file of patch
1	1	10.6	ASGANDO	Dungri	2	View file
2	2	70.9	ASGANDO	Dungri	15,25,199,184	View file

(ii). Copy of CA scheme details:

(iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:

(iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:

(V).

Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details

S. No.	Documents	Remarks
NIL

14. District Profile

S.no	District Name	Geographical area of the district (in ha.)	Forest area of the district (in ha.)	Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)	No. of Approved Cases	Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)	Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)	A) Forest land (in ha.)	B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1	Giridih	485355.81	159160.78	479.5895	25	810	30/09/2018	810	0
2	Deoghar	242859	23906	841.84	11	1240.514	28/09/2018	978.32	307.728

15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land

Division Name	Circle	Site inspected By	Whether site inspected	No. of times site visited	Site inspection report	Date of visit
Deoghar	Deoghar	DFO	Yes	One		26/09/2018
Giridih	Deoghar	DFO	Yes	One		29/09/2018
	Deoghar	CF	Yes	One		25/10/2018
		Nodal Officer	No		No Data

(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))

16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason

Division	Circle	Recommendation By	Recommendation	Reason	Whether CF agreed
Deoghar	Deoghar	DFO	Recommended	Jharkhand is having acute shortage of electricity production hence this proposal may be accepted with the provisions of Penal NPV and Penal CA which government may deem fit.
Giridih	Deoghar	DFO	Recommended	The required land in various plots fall within demarcated notified forest area and is unavoidable and barest minimum, required for the project as alternative route was examined in the field but proposed route is the best suitable route which cover, minimum forest land to be diverted for this project together with jungle jhari land. No rare endangered species of flora and fauna is noticed in this area. No protected archeological heritage site/ defense establishment or other important monuments are located in that concerned area.
	Deoghar	CF	Recommended	The required land in various plots fall within demarcated notified forest area and is unavoidable and barest minimum, required for the project as alternative route was examined in the field but proposed route is the best suitable route which cover, minimum forest land to be diverted for this project together with jungle jhari land. No rare endangered species of flora and fauna is noticed in this area. No protected archeological heritage site/ defense establishment or other important monuments are located in that concerned area.	Yes
		Nodal Officer	Recommended	Recommended

Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)

17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)

State	Recommendation By	Recommendation	Recommendation Date	Remarks	Signing Authority	Notification	Recommendation Letter
Jharkhand	State Secretary	Recommended	15/04/2019		State Govt. Officer	No Data

17. Stage-I Clearance Report

Regional Office	Recommendation By	MoEF File No.	Date of Stage-I Clearance	Clearance Letter
Ranchi	Regional Office	FP/JH/TRANS/31258/2018	03/05/2019

18. Payment made by User Agency

Proposal No.	Application No.	Total Amount (Rs.)	Recieved Amount (Rs.)	Transaction Date	Transaction ID	Bank Name	Mode of Payment	Demmand Generated By User Agency	Demmand Verified By Nodal Officer	Uploaded Demand Letter
FP/JH/TRANS/31258/2018	TRANS312582018712	53,892,470.00	53,892,470.00	19/06/2019	SBINR52019061900026156	Corporation Bank	NEFT/RTGS (Challan)	16/06/2019	18/06/2019
FP/JH/TRANS/31258/2018	TRANS312582018592	54,100,544.00	54,100,544.00	02/07/2019	SBINR52019070200059923	Corporation Bank	NEFT/RTGS (Challan)	29/06/2019	01/07/2019

19. Uploaded Status of Land to be transferred to Forest Department under FCA (Mutation Details) : No

20. Mutation Details Verified By Nodal Officer

Proposal No.	Verified Date	Mutation Letter	Remarks
FP/JH/TRANS/31258/2018	09 Jul 2019	No Data	Verified

21. Compliance Details Submitted by User Agency

Proposal No.	Compliance Details submitted on(Date)	Uploaded Letter
FP/JH/TRANS/31258/2018	26 Dec 2024

22. Compliance Details Verified by Nodal Officer

Proposal No.	Remarks	Verified Date	Uploaded Letter
FP/JH/TRANS/31258/2018	Stage I Compliance	15 May 2025

23. Stage-II Clearance Details

Proposal No.	Date of Stage-II Clearance	Proposal Status	Clearance Letter
FP/JH/TRANS/31258/2018		Approved In-Principle	No Data