PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
JH-012/2017
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Jharkhand
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Jharkhand
(ii)
District :
West Singhbhum
(iii)
Forest Division :
Saranda
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
9.969
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Road
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Saranda
0.56
Protected Forest
2
Saranda
0.03
jungle-jhari land
3
Saranda
9.379
Reserved Forest
Total
9.969
Division 1. : Saranda
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
West Singhbhum
9.969
Total
9.969
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
9.969
0.5
Eco 1
Total.
9.969
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Shorea Robusta
Sal
0
14
35
64
55
59
2
Terminalia Tomentosa
Asan
0
54
49
24
15
7
3
Adina cordifolia
Karam
0
30
22
9
4
5
4
Madhuca indica
Mahau
0
07
10
5
5
3
5
Syzigium Cumini
Jamun
0
01
3
0
2
0
6
Gmelina Arborea
Gamhar
0
0
2
0
0
0
7
Others
Misc
0
217
252
128
44
17
Total
0
323
373
230
125
91
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
1142
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
As per the prescription of the Working Plan the proposed diversion area are mostly in the head of Selection cum Improvement and Conservation Working Circle.
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
Not velnerable
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Hayena Wolf , Wild dog, Barking deer, Mouse deer, Elephant etc. It is part of Singhbhum Elephant Reserve.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
Yes
(a)Details of violation(s):
No Data
(b) Period of Work done(year) :
1
(c) Area of forest land involved in violation (in ha.) :
8.411
S. No.
Name of person responsible for violation
Designation & Address of person responsible for violation
Action taken against the person responsible for violation
1
V N Sharma
Executive Engineer
Offence and violation reported to D C Committee for action
2
Umesh Kumar
Assistant Engineer
Offence and violation reported to D C Committee for action
3
D K Soni
Junior Engineer
Offence and violation reported to D C Committee for action
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
No
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
NIL
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
West Singhbhum
535100
259400
2098.479
24
248.090
27/03/2017
0
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Saranda
Chaibasa
DFO
Yes
One
26/03/2017
Chaibasa
CF
Yes
One
02/04/2017
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Saranda
Chaibasa
DFO
Recommended
quetiapin ritalin
markenavntablet.site
quetiapin wirkstoff
Chaibasa
CF
Recommended
Since forest land has already been broken/ encroached by User Agency beyond the existing width of 12.00m. the proposal be by considered as per provisions.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
quetiapin ritalin
quetiapin mod angst
quetiapin wirkstoff
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Jharkhand
State Secretary
Recommended
09/05/2017
State Govt. Officer
No Data
17.
Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional Office
Recommendation By
MoEF File No.
Date of Stage-I Clearance
Clearance Letter
Ranchi
Regional Office
FP/JH/ROAD/23799/2017
05/02/2018
18.
Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.
Application No.
Total Amount (Rs.)
Recieved Amount (Rs.)
Transaction Date
Transaction ID
Bank Name
Mode of Payment
Demmand Generated By User Agency
Demmand Verified By Nodal Officer
Uploaded Demand Letter
FP/JH/ROAD/23799/2017
ROAD237992017694
12,233,097.00
12,233,097.00
22/03/2018
301609
Corporation Bank
Corporation Bank (Challan)
07/03/2018
07/03/2018
19.
Uploaded Status of Land to be transferred to Forest Department under FCA (Mutation Details) :
No
20.
Mutation Details Verified By Nodal Officer
Proposal No.
Verified Date
Mutation Letter
Remarks
FP/JH/ROAD/23799/2017
27 Jun 2018
No Data
verified
Compliance Details Submitted by User Agency(old)
Proposal No.
Compliance Details submitted on(Date)
Reject Remarks
Reject Date
Uploaded Letter
FP/JH/ROAD/23799/2017
28 Jun 2018
EDS: Please take note on EDS by GOJ
26 Jul 2022
22.
Compliance Details Verified by Nodal Officer
Proposal No.
Remarks
Verified Date
Uploaded Letter
FP/JH/ROAD/23799/2017
Stage - I compliance
03 Jul 2018
23.
Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.
Date of Stage-II Clearance
Proposal Status
Clearance Letter
FP/JH/ROAD/23799/2017
Approved In-Principle
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×