PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
JH-052/2021
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Jharkhand
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Jharkhand
(ii)
District :
Dhanbad
(iii)
Forest Division :
Dhanbad
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
133.69
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Mining
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Dhanbad
46.17
Protected Forest
2
Dhanbad
87.52
jungle-jhari land
Total
133.69
Division 1. : Dhanbad
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Dhanbad
133.69
Total
133.69
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
133.69
0.5
Eco 3
Total.
133.69
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Acacia Auricuiformis
Acacia
277
237
55
8
0
0
2
Ailanthus excelsa
Ailanthus Ghorneem
19
34
35
8
4
0
3
Cassia Fistula
Amaltas
3
1
1
0
0
0
4
Psidium Guajava
Amrood
20
2
0
0
0
0
5
Terminalia Arjuna
Arjun
16
2
0
0
0
0
6
Acacia Nilotica
Babul
128
83
5
0
0
0
7
Ficus benghalensis
Bargad
3
2
1
0
1
3
8
Aegle Marmelos
Bel
4
8
1
2
0
0
9
Zizyphus Xylopyrus
Ber
439
80
5
0
0
0
10
Millingtonia Hortensis
Buch
2
0
0
0
0
0
11
Cassia Siamea
Chakundi
61
400
163
21
1
0
12
Others
Charcoal tree
0
6
3
1
1
0
13
Others
Cheli
0
1
0
0
0
0
14
Alstonia Scholaris
Chhatni
9
19
6
2
1
1
15
Others
Isoberliniadoka
49
63
14
3
1
0
16
Moringa oleifera
Drumstick
0
0
1
0
0
0
17
Gmelin Arborea
Gamhar
146
82
14
0
0
0
18
Plumeria Sps
Gulani
0
0
1
0
0
0
19
Ficus Racemosa
Gular Dumar
46
30
6
3
0
0
20
Delonix Regia
Gulmohar
2
1
0
0
0
0
21
Syzigium Cumini
Jamun
34
5
0
0
0
0
22
Albizia Procera
Kaala siris
289
36
14
0
1
0
23
Others
Bauhinia variegata(Kachnar)
1
0
0
0
0
0
24
Others
Neolamarckiacadamba (Kaddam)
0
0
1
1
0
0
25
Others
Naucleaparvifolia(Karam)
87
64
33
10
1
0
26
Others
Averrhoacarambola(Karambal)
0
4
1
0
0
0
27
Others
Millettiapinnata(Karanz)
36
28
9
10
2
1
28
Others
H.adenophyllum(Katsagwan)
104
41
1
0
0
0
29
Others
Senegalia catechu(Khair)
0
1
0
0
0
0
30
Madhuca indica
Mahua
7
0
0
0
0
0
31
Others
Lawsonia inermis(Mehndi)
3
0
0
0
0
0
32
Azadirachta Indica
Neem
14
22
6
1
0
1
33
Butea Monosperma
Palash
14
61
23
2
0
0
34
Ficus Religiosa
Peepal
14
27
5
7
3
6
35
Others
Repon
26
7
0
0
0
0
36
Tectona Grandis
Sagwan
5
22
2
0
0
0
37
Others
Streblusasper(Sahada)
0
1
0
0
0
0
38
Dalburgia Sisoo
Seesham
1225
1014
474
101
10
5
39
Bombax Ceiba
Semal
14
13
12
3
0
1
40
Others
Morusindica(Shahtoot)
2
0
0
0
0
0
41
Others
Vitexnegundo(Sindwar)
0
1
0
0
0
0
42
Albizzia lebbeck
Siris
77
12
0
0
0
0
43
Others
Leucaenaleucocephala(Subabul)
1479
968
155
23
3
1
44
Others
Vansupati
1
0
0
0
0
0
Total
4656
3378
1047
206
29
19
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
9335
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
Plantation working circle.
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
Vulnerable to Soil erosion. Hence, Soil and Moisture Conservation Plan is recomended
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Snakes, Wolf, Rabbit, Wild Dog etc. are found in the forest proposed for diversion.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
Yes
(a)Details of violation(s):
NIL
(b) Period of Work done(year) :
05
(c) Area of forest land involved in violation (in ha.) :
47.62
S. No.
Name of person responsible for violation
Designation & Address of person responsible for violation
Action taken against the person responsible for violation
1
S P Sahu and A N Yadav
GM Muriadih BCCL and PO Muriadih BCCL
case initatied under I F Act and chage sheet filed
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
No
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
3522.87424
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
20
Chalkari
Topchanchi
1, 3
View file
2
2
20.23
Panchrukhi
Topchanchi
776
View file
3
3
21.21
Pargho
Topchanchi
287, 314, 1, 55
View file
4
4
12.06
Bantor
Topchanchi
7, 35
View file
5
5
17.82
Sapanpur
Topchanchi
186, 189, 185, 137
View file
6
6
25
Targa
Topchanchi
1676, 1352, 1411
View file
7
20
9.75
Baryatand
Tundi
2, 70
View file
8
21
4.41
Nawatand
Tundi
2321, 2337, 2339
View file
9
22
3
Fatehpur
Tundi
3P,1077P,54P
View file
10
23
2.38
Machiyara
Tundi
212
View file
11
10
2.43
Banpura
Topchanchi
59,14
View file
12
14
13.83
Gethibera
Tundi
1, 320, 322, 1243, 1245, 1288
View file
13
15
14.09
Sundarpahari
Tundi
6, 335, 306
View file
14
16
11.91
Daldali
Tundi
1477
View file
15
17
5.52
Chururia
Tundi
1802, 1796, 1793, 1803
View file
16
18
20
Kurkutand
Tundi
1082, 113, 386, 430P
View file
17
19
8.24
Madhopur
Tundi
202, 898, 880
View file
18
7
20
Udaipur
Topchanchi
1321, 1341
View file
19
8
12
Uperankura
Topchanchi
696, 61, 170, 130, 553
View file
20
9
6.18
Kharmo
Topchanchi
59, 302, 102
View file
21
11
2.21
Jaipur
Topchanchi
74, 142
View file
22
12
8.75
Pandugri
Tundi
169P
View file
23
13
9.42
Durgadih
Tundi
117
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
SITE INSPECTION REPORT
2
RECOMMENDATION
3
Forwarding Letter
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Dhanbad
204000
20646
569.794
13
1161.892
16/11/2022
1150.46
90.39
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Dhanbad
Bokaro
DFO
Yes
One
20/05/2022
Bokaro
CF
Yes
One
30/11/2022
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Dhanbad
Bokaro
DFO
Recommended
The location of Coal reserve is site specific hence Muraidih Colliery, BCCL has no other alternative. The proposed forest land for diversion is unavoidable and bare minimum. In this purview, the proposal is recommended for diversion.
Bokaro
CF
Recommended
As the location of coal reserve is site specific, hence BCCL has no other alternative. The proposed forest land for diversion is unavoidable and bare minimum. Hence it is recommended.
Yes
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×