PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
JH-07/2017
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Jharkhand
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Jharkhand
(ii)
District :
Latehar,Garhwa
(iii)
Forest Division :
Latehar
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
1007.29
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Irrigation
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Latehar
962.26
Protected Forest
2
Latehar
45.03
jungle-jhari land
Total
1007.29
Division 1. : Latehar
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(in ha.)
NIL
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
1007.29
0.4
Eco 3
Total.
1007.29
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Terminalia Arjuna
arjun
0
101
393
101
1088
0
2
Terminalia Tomentosa
Asan
0
4341
5822
1088
393
0
3
Emblica Officinalis
Awala
0
2075
0
101
0
0
4
Terminalia bellerica
Bahera
0
1088
393
201
201
0
5
Aegle Marmelos
Bel
0
494
101
0
0
0
6
Semecarpus Anacardium
Bhelwa
0
786
0
0
0
0
7
Holoptelia integrifolia
Chilbil
0
101
0
0
0
0
8
Gmelina Arborea
Gamhar
0
0
0
0
101
0
9
Ficus Racemosa
Gular
0
786
393
494
292
0
10
Terminalia Chebula
Harre
0
292
201
0
0
0
11
Syzigium Cumini
Jamun
0
11060
2861
101
101
0
12
Albizzia lebbeck
Kala siris
0
201
0
101
0
0
13
Adena Cardifolia
Karam
0
1189
393
494
101
0
14
Others
amra
0
0
0
0
101
0
15
Others
Ber
0
1088
201
0
0
0
16
Others
Buchu
0
393
0
0
0
0
17
Others
churchu
0
393
0
0
0
0
18
Others
Dhautha
0
4049
1581
494
0
0
19
Others
Doka
0
1773
695
201
101
0
20
Others
Dumar
0
101
101
0
201
0
21
Others
Ghot
0
1189
101
0
0
0
22
Others
Guri Karam
0
594
201
0
0
0
23
Others
Kaj
0
1581
1279
201
0
0
24
Others
Kari
0
2961
494
101
0
0
25
Bauhinia Parviflora
Kathmohli
0
101
0
0
0
0
26
Diasporus Melanoxylon
Kend
0
2770
201
0
0
0
27
Acacia Catechu
Khair
0
1974
0
0
0
0
28
Others
Koriaya
0
4442
0
0
0
0
29
Others
Kumbhi
0
292
0
0
0
0
30
Others
Kusum
0
695
0
0
0
0
31
Madhuca indica
Mahua
0
886
1682
101
201
0
32
Pterocarpus Marsupium
Paisar
0
494
0
0
0
0
33
Butea Monosperma
Palas
0
24195
13135
2569
393
0
34
Others
Parasi
0
101
0
0
0
0
35
Ficus Religiosa
Pipal
0
0
0
0
90
11
36
Others
Piyar
0
1189
393
0
0
0
37
Others
Poto
0
101
0
0
0
0
38
Others
Raipan
0
2075
594
201
0
0
39
Others
Rohan
0
101
0
0
0
0
40
Melotus Philippensis
Rori
0
7111
987
0
0
0
41
Shorea Robusta
Sal
0
11654
9378
2176
594
0
42
Boswellia Serrata
Salai
0
201
101
0
0
0
43
Bombox Ceiba
Semal
0
292
201
101
201
0
44
Lagerstroemia Parviflora
Sidha
0
3062
3656
886
101
0
45
Others
Tilay
0
101
0
0
0
0
46
Ficus Tomentosa
Varun
0
101
594
292
0
0
Total
0
98574
46132
10004
4260
11
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
158981
(iii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL-2 meter
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
NIL
(iv)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL-4 meter
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
NIL
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
As per prescription proposed in tiger conservation plan of Palamu Tiger Reserve
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The terrain of forest area is undulating with murram soil or soft soil. The presence of gullies on forest land shows that the area is prone to erosion. The vulnerability of soil to
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Spotted Deer, Wild Boar, Barking Deer, Golden Jackal, Elephant, Bear etc has been reported. Besides this, Tiger as occasional visitor has also been reported in area.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
Yes
Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas :
The project will definitely disturb the corridors of Elephant and movement of other animals but apart from these disadvantages the Dam created the permanent water body in drier part of Tiger Reserve, it may creates Bird Conservation site and many other indirect benefits like fisheries, agriculture and other livelihood options.
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
Yes
Details and comments on the impact of Project on such areas :
The project will definitely disturb the corridors of Elephant and movement of other animals but apart from these disadvantages the Dam created the permanent water body in drier part of Tiger Reserve, it creates Bird Conservation site and many other indirect benefits like fisheries, agriculture and other livelihood options.
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
NIL
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Latehar
306605
57589
0
0
0
21/04/2017
0
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Latehar
Medininagar
DFO
Yes
Two
09/02/2017,21/02/2017
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Latehar
Medininagar
DFO
Recommended
Dam created the permanent water body in drier part of Tiger Reserve, it may creates Bird Conservation site, many other indirect benefits like fisheries, agriculture and other livelihood options.
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×