PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
JH-017/2019
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Jharkhand
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Jharkhand
(ii)
District :
Seraikela
(iii)
Forest Division :
Saraikela
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
8.74
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Industry
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Saraikela
8.74
Protected Forest
Total
8.74
Division 1. : Saraikela
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Seraikela
8.74
Total
8.74
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
8.74
0.3
Eco 3
Total.
8.74
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Others
AMRA
0
2
2
0
0
0
2
Terminalia Arjuna
ARJUN
1
1
2
0
0
0
3
Pterospermum Acerifolia
BANAHARA
1
0
0
0
0
0
4
Others
BANDARLOR
0
3
0
1
0
0
5
Ficus Bengalensis
BARGAD
0
0
1
0
0
0
6
Aegle Marmelos
BEL
0
1
0
1
0
0
7
Others
BER
0
2
1
0
0
0
8
Terminalia Bellarica
BOHRA
0
0
1
1
0
0
9
Others
CHAILI
1
1
4
0
1
1
10
Others
DOKA
2
9
1
2
0
0
11
Ficus Racemosa
DUMAR
0
2
1
1
0
0
12
Gmelin Arborea
GAMHAR
0
4
5
0
0
0
13
Delonix Regia
GULMOHAR
6
46
48
13
6
5
14
Syzigium Cumini
JAMUN
5
32
10
7
1
2
15
Others
KARIPATTA
0
1
0
0
0
0
16
Others
KUSUM
1
5
0
1
0
0
17
Others
LEGRA
11
29
13
6
0
0
18
Others
NEBRI
0
2
0
0
0
0
19
Azadirachta Indica
NEEM
0
14
12
1
0
0
20
Others
PAKADE
1
1
0
0
0
0
21
Butea Monosperma
PALASH
16
105
13
3
0
1
22
Peltoform Pterocarpum
PLATOFORM
1
6
20
16
19
9
23
Shorea Robusta
SAL
0
1
0
0
0
0
24
Tectona Grandis
SAGWAN
3
100
65
23
5
6
25
Others
SEMAL
0
7
14
6
2
1
26
Dalburgia Sisoo
SISAM
2
12
31
19
11
1
27
Others
SIRIS
3
7
19
9
4
2
28
Others
SURSINGH
0
4
1
0
0
0
29
Acacia Auriculiformis
Ekasiya
2
35
138
81
26
10
30
Others
KOSAI
13
43
22
7
4
3
31
Mangifera Indica
AAM
0
2
8
2
1
3
32
Adena Cardifolia
KARAM
0
2
3
2
0
0
Total
69
479
435
202
80
44
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
1309
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
Srirampur and Shikhardih come under Plantation working circle.
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The forest area is flat and hence there are minimal chances to soil erosion.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Proposed area is located in urban area and thus no wild life is present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
46.281
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
18
MAHADEOPUR
saraikela
395P,409,410,414,909,1056,1055
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Aiada NOC
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Seraikela
272455
54349.57
152.085284
11
171.4824
31/07/2019
67.52
49.053
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Saraikela
Jamshedpur
DFO
Yes
One
23/08/2019
Jamshedpur
CF
Yes
One
28/08/2019
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Saraikela
Jamshedpur
DFO
Recommended
The proposed diversion is required for getting environmental clearance for expansion of the LPG bottling plant. This will enhance supply of LPG to consumers.
Jamshedpur
CF
Recommended
As the expansion of the bottling plant will enhance the supply of LPG to consumers, the proposal is recommended.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Recommended
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×