PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
JH-010/2022
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Jharkhand
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Jharkhand
(ii)
District :
Ramgarh
(iii)
Forest Division :
Ramgarh
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
36.94
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Industry
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Ramgarh
20
Protected Forest
2
Ramgarh
16.94
jungle-jhari land
Total
36.94
Division 1. : Ramgarh
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Ramgarh
36.94
Total
36.94
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
36.94
0.3
Eco 3
Total.
36.94
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Mangifera Indica
Aam
0
1
0
2
1
0
2
Psidium Guajava
Amrudh
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
Hardwickia Binnata
Anjan
0
2
0
1
0
0
4
Terminalia Arjuna
Arjun
0
1
1
0
0
0
5
Saraca Asoca
Ashok
0
32
1
0
0
0
6
Babul
Babul
3
0
0
0
0
0
7
Ficus benghalensis
Bargad
0
0
0
0
0
1
8
Casurina Equisitifolia
Casurina
0
1
3
0
0
0
9
Cassia Siamea
Chakundi
35
48
37
14
3
0
10
Ficus Racemosa
Dumar
0
1
0
0
0
1
11
Gmelin Arborea
Gamhar
0
0
0
1
0
0
12
Delonix Regia
Gulmohar
5
4
9
4
3
2
13
Tamarindus Indica
Imali
0
0
0
0
1
0
14
Syzigium Cumini
Jamun
7
50
10
0
1
1
15
Karanj
Karanj
4
8
3
3
1
0
16
Artocarpus Heterophyllus
Kathal
0
1
0
2
0
0
17
Diasporus Melanoxylon
Kend
7
3
1
0
0
0
18
Holoptelia integrifolia
Koje
97
69
5
1
0
0
19
Eucalyptus
Lyptus
0
0
0
0
0
1
20
Madhuca indica
Mahua
0
5
0
0
1
2
21
Azadirachta Indica
Neem
28
39
7
4
2
0
22
Butea Monosperma
Palash
9
22
14
13
4
0
23
Ficus Religiosa
Peepal
0
1
2
0
0
5
24
Ziayphus xylopyra
Korewa
93
47
4
0
0
0
25
Tectona Grandis
Sagwan
0
1
0
0
0
0
26
Shorea Robusta
Sakhua
7
32
58
3
1
0
27
Bombax Ceiba
Simar
3
12
1
0
4
1
28
Dalburgia Sisoo
Shisham
5
82
18
1
1
0
29
Lagerstroemia Parviflora
Sidha
39
29
7
2
0
0
30
Alberia Lebbac (Dirshanam)
Siris
0
7
0
0
0
0
31
Misc. Species
Others
63
113
37
3
5
6
Total
406
611
218
54
28
20
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
1337
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
Large part of the area lies in Coppice with standard working Circle
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
This area is moderately prone to erosion
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Elephant, Rabbit, Jackal, Snakes, wild bore, deer, Hyena, Fox, Monkey etc.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i).
Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no
District Name
Village
Area(in ha.)
khasra
KML file
Present Owner file
1
Chatra
Tigda
7.76
211,212,213,217,218,219,220,221,225,226
2
Chatra
Tigda
0.72
547,553,554
3
Chatra
Tigda
2.53
616,642,644,645,646,647,648,686,687
4
Chatra
Tigda
3.88
618,619,620,621,622,623,624,625,626,627
5
Chatra
Tigda
1.93
514,515,516,517,518,519,520,521,533
6
Chatra
Tigda
21.28
379,414,415,416,417,418,424,426,427,428,429,430,432,433,434,437,438,439,440,441,442,444,446,448,454,455,456,457,458,459,474,476,478,479,480,482,485,489,522,523,526,527,528,530,532,538,556,557,569,570,
7
Chatra
Tigda
1.27
140,141,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,156,159
(ii).
Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iii).
Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
NA
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Recommendation report.
2
Part-II of WBC -36.94 Ha
3
Site inspection report
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Ramgarh
136008
48793
3747.318
57
4811.26
01/10/2022
4811.26
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Ramgarh
Bokaro
DFO
Yes
One
08/07/2022
Bokaro
CF
No
No Data
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Ramgarh
Bokaro
DFO
Recommended
This project is recommended for diversion as per the provision of FC Act/Rule.
Bokaro
CF
Recommended
As the project is site specific for construction of washery and conveyor belt of expansion of coal production capacity, Hence it is recommended.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Recommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Jharkhand
State Secretary
Recommended
10/11/2023
Recommended
State Govt. Officer
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×