PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
JH-08/2021
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Jharkhand
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Jharkhand
(ii)
District :
Seraikela Kharsawan
(iii)
Forest Division :
Saraikela
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
34.83
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Industry
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Saraikela
32.29
Protected Forest
2
Saraikela
2.54
jungle-jhari land
Total
34.83
Division 1. : Saraikela
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Seraikela Kharsawan
34.83
Total
34.83
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
34.83
0.2
Eco 3
Total.
34.83
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Butea Monosperma
Palas
0
188
102
22
1
2
2
Mammea Longifolia
Mahua
0
0
0
5
11
25
3
Diasporus Melanoxylon
Kendu
0
0
0
1
4
3
4
Azadirachta Indica
Neem
0
1
4
0
0
0
5
Acacia Catechu
Acacia
0
2
16
17
1
3
6
Pongamia Pinnata
Karanj
0
3
3
0
0
0
7
Melia Azadirachta
Mahaneem
0
3
1
4
0
0
8
Mangifera Indica
Amm
0
0
1
1
0
0
Total
0
197
127
50
17
33
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
424
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
Proposed area comes under Rehabilitation-cum-Soil Conservation WC and Plantation Working Circle.
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The forest land proposed for diversion is very moderately vulnerable to erosion.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
As the forest land proposed for diversion lies in Tilopada, Bankipur, and Karangirigura, The proposed forest land for diversion has jackal, Indian hare, Python, Indian Elephant used to roam in these area occasionally.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
Yes
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
Yes
(a)Details of violation(s):
A complaint case has been registered CC No. 582-20
(b) Period of Work done(year) :
3
(c) Area of forest land involved in violation (in ha.) :
0.809
S. No.
Name of person responsible for violation
Designation & Address of person responsible for violation
Action taken against the person responsible for violation
1
Basant Kumar and VSB Giridhar
Basant Kr AVP and VSB Giridhar President Amalagam Steel pvt ltd
A complaint case has been registered CC No. 582-2022 against the User Agency for the encroachment of 2 acres of forest plot no. 59,60,122 of Tilopada-village. The user agency has a pending encroachment case vide BPLE Case No. 03- 2022-23. So, Penal NPV may be imposed on the User Agency.
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
Yes
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i).
Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no
District Name
Village
Area(in ha.)
khasra
KML file
Present Owner file
1
Gumla
Kamta
7.56
409, 410, 411, 450, 451, 452
2
Gumla
Samal
4.92
634,635,645,646
3
Purbi Singhbhum
Banmakri
5.45
2233p, 2234,2237p,2247p,2240,2245,2249, 2250, 2251, 2252, 2255
4
Seraikela Kharsawan
Hesalong
20.23
1p, 4,5p,6,7,14,15,16,17,18p,19,20,21,22,23p,24,29p,31,32p,33p,34,35,36p, 38,43,44p,45p, 103, 104p, 105, 1912p
(ii).
Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iii).
Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
NA
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Division Name
Patch No.
Area(in ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Village Name
Survey No.
Compartment No./any identification No.
KML file of patch
1
Saraikela
1
20.23
Hesolong
chandil
Hesalong
103
1p, 4,5p,6,7,14,15,16,17,18p,19,20,21,22,23p,24,29p,31,32p,33p,34,35,36p, 38,43,44p,45p, 103, 104p, 105, 1912p
2
Gumla
4.92
Samal
Gumla
Samal
59
634,635,645,646
3
Gumla
7.56
Kamta
Gumla
Kamta
45
409, 410, 411, 450, 451, 452
4
Dalbhum
5.45
Ban Makri
Musabani
Ban Makri
1019
2233p, 2234,2237p,2247p,2240,2245,2249, 2250, 2251, 2252, 2255
(i).
Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(ii).
Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:
(iii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iv).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A:
33959533
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
NIL
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Seraikela Kharsawan
272500
54349.57
171.56184
15
442.884
31/03/2025
367.188
49.053
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Saraikela
Jamshedpur
DFO
Yes
One
12/03/2025
Jamshedpur
CF
Yes
One
30/05/2025
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Saraikela
Jamshedpur
DFO
Recommended
In view of the anticipated economic, social and developmental benefits, this proposal is recommend to be accepted by competent authority.
Jamshedpur
CF
Recommended
In view of the anticipated economic, social and developmental benefits, this proposal is recommended to be accepted by competent authority.
Yes
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×