PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
JH-054/2019
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Jharkhand
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Jharkhand
(ii)
District :
Ramgarh
(iii)
Forest Division :
Ramgarh
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
9.27
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Encroachments
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Ramgarh
2.27
Protected Forest
2
Ramgarh
7
jungle-jhari land
Total
9.27
Division 1. : Ramgarh
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Ramgarh
9.27
Total
9.27
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
2.27
0.5
Eco 3
2
7
0.3
Eco 3
Total.
9.27
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Mangifera Indica
Aam
0
3
2
0
0
0
2
Ficus Bengalensis
Bargad
0
0
0
0
1
4
3
Cassia Siamea
Chakundi
617
678
39
5
0
0
4
Gmelin Arborea
Gamhar
1
16
4
0
0
0
5
Ailanthus excelsa
Karanj
5
32
50
66
5
1
6
Aegle Marmelos
Bel
0
1
0
0
0
0
7
Delonix Regia
Gulmohar
9
31
14
1
0
1
8
Syzigium Cumini
Jamun
0
0
0
1
0
0
9
Azadirachta Indica
Neem
0
1
0
0
0
0
10
Butea Monosperma
Palash
21
142
12
1
0
0
11
Ficus Religiosa
Pipal
0
0
1
1
0
1
12
Moringa oleifera
Sahjan
0
0
2
2
0
0
13
Tectona Grandis
shagwan
10
14
7
2
0
0
14
Dalburgia Sisoo
Shisham
2
11
14
4
0
0
15
Bombax Ceiba
Simar
2
5
2
2
1
0
16
Alberia Lebbac (Dirshanam)
Sirish
2
9
5
6
1
0
17
Madhuca indica
Mahua
0
0
0
0
0
7
18
Ficus Racemosa
Dumar
1
3
2
1
0
0
19
Misc. Species
Others
2
10
1
0
0
0
Total
672
956
155
92
8
14
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
1897
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
Rehabilitation cum plantation working Circle.
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
Not prone. Almost flat terrain.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Snake, Jackal etc.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
Yes
(a)Details of violation(s):
Non intentional Non compliance over 7 Ha
(b) Period of Work done(year) :
18
(c) Area of forest land involved in violation (in ha.) :
7.00
S. No.
Name of person responsible for violation
Designation & Address of person responsible for violation
Action taken against the person responsible for violation
1
MS Aloke Steel
Village Budhakhap Ramgarh
Not Applicable as the JJ Land was settled to raiyats before Nineteen Hundred Eighty and it is a case of unaware no compliance Only after land schedule was obtained from CO for forest diversion proposal real nature of land came into cognizance of authorities and area of proposal was increased to include old JJ Thus no case has been registered by revenue or Forest
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
Yes
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
(i).
Patch wise details of non-forest or Revenue forest land to be provided by User Agency for CA
Patch Wise Details
S.no
District Name
Village
Area(in ha.)
khasra
KML file
Present Owner file
1
Giridih
korabandha
2.83
447,448,449, 450
2
Giridih
purhara
2.43
11
3
Giridih
purhara
4.04
29
(ii).
Upload a scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iii).
Upload a copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iv).
Copy of CA scheme details:
NA
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Offline Part-2 of Aloke Steel industries.
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Ramgarh
157260
50581
3447.32
59
11001
14/11/2023
3956
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Ramgarh
Bokaro
DFO
Yes
One
11/10/2023
Bokaro
CF
No
No Data
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Ramgarh
Bokaro
DFO
Recommended
The project is recommended considering its site specificity, JJ Land being already in non forestry use, old unaware noncompliance and positive outcomes of the project like reduced air pollution and lesser loss of groundwater.
Bokaro
CF
Recommended
As the project is site specific Mini Steel Plant of M/s Alok Industries, hence it is recommended.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Recommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Jharkhand
State Secretary
Recommended
04/03/2024
Recommended
State Govt. Officer
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×