PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
HP-063/2021
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Himachal Pradesh
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Himachal Pradesh
(ii)
District :
Bilaspur
(iii)
Forest Division :
Bilaspur
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
1.3463
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Drinking Water
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Bilaspur
1.3463
DPF and UPF
Total
1.3463
Division 1. : Bilaspur
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Bilaspur
1.3463
Total
1.3463
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
1.3463
0.1
Eco 5
Total.
1.3463
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Others
Chall (Anogeissus latifolia)
0
24
27
7
1
0
2
Lagerstroemia Parviflora
Shalmaltas (Lannea coromandelica)
0
0
2
1
0
0
3
Others
Chil (Pinus roxburghi)
0
1
2
1
0
0
4
Others
Kamala (Mallotus philippinensis
0
1
0
0
0
0
5
Cassia Fistula
Amaltas
0
4
1
0
0
0
6
Others
Barnah (Feronia Limonia)
0
3
0
0
0
0
7
Others
Dakanan (Diospyros Cordifolia)
0
1
0
0
0
0
8
Others
Shisham ( Delbergia Sisoo
0
1
0
0
0
0
9
Nyctanthes Arbor-Tristis
Koori
0
1
0
0
0
0
10
Acacia Catechu
Khair
0
22
3
0
0
0
Total
0
58
35
9
1
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
103
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
As per working plan the area has been prescription under Protection, Plantation & Chil working circle.
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
No danger to erosion in the area as the soil starta is rocky.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0.6
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Wild boar, barking deer, rabbit, jackal, leopard, porcupine, peacock, parrot, etc.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
Yes
(a)Details of violation(s):
DR and Challan are uploaded in additional informat
(b) Period of Work done(year) :
2022
(c) Area of forest land involved in violation (in ha.) :
0.0598
S. No.
Name of person responsible for violation
Designation & Address of person responsible for violation
Action taken against the person responsible for violation
1
As per user agency the worker of contractor and Firm has inadvertently started the excavation work
As per user agency the worker of contractor and Firm has inadvertently started the excavation work
The compensation amount has been realized from the violators of FCA
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
No
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
651188
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
2.7
DPF Badoh
Shree Naina Devi
DPF Badoh
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Location map
2
NPV Bill
3
Reclamation of muck dumping site
4
Challan and DR
5
Penal NPV
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Bilaspur
116700
42800
772.6072
80
1724.425
31/03/2021
1454.0155
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Bilaspur
Bilaspur
DFO
Yes
One
15/07/2021
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Bilaspur
Bilaspur
DFO
Recommended
In Bilaspur district except small land holdings all the land available is forest land. Hence, Forest land proposed by UA is unavoidable and is barest minimum required for project.
Bilaspur
CF
Recommended
The proposed land for diversion is unavoidable and is barest minimum and no alternate suitable non forest land is available, hence recommended.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Recommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Himachal Pradesh
State Secretary
Recommended
17/11/2021
Recommended
State Govt. Officer
No Data
17.
Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional Office
Recommendation By
MoEF File No.
Date of Stage-I Clearance
Clearance Letter
Shimla
Head Office
FC/HPB/02/38/2021
23/06/2025
23.
Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.
Date of Stage-II Clearance
Proposal Status
Clearance Letter
FP/HP/WATER/118984/2021
Approved In-Principle
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×