PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
HP-0184/2020
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Himachal Pradesh
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Himachal Pradesh
(ii)
District :
Mandi
(iii)
Forest Division :
Suket
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
0.2704
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Transmission Line
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Suket
0.2704
CVD, OTHER
Total
0.2704
Division 1. : Suket
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Mandi
0.2704
Total
0.2704
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
0.2704
1.3
Eco 5
Total.
0.2704
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Eucalyptus
Safeda
0
1
1
0
0
0
2
Syzigium Cumini
Jamun
0
4
2
0
0
0
3
Melotus Philippensis
Kambal
0
5
3
0
0
0
4
Bombax Ceiba
Simbal
0
1
0
2
1
0
5
Mangifera Indica
Aam
0
4
2
2
0
1
6
Ficus Religiosa
Pipal
0
3
1
0
0
0
7
Others
Toon (Toona ciliata)
0
8
7
0
0
0
8
Dalburgia Sisoo
Shisham
0
1
1
0
0
0
9
Others
Kakre (Pistacia integerimma
0
11
3
0
0
0
10
Others
Chiuli (Prunis armeniaca)
0
2
0
1
0
0
11
Others
Khirak (Celtis australis)
0
7
0
0
0
0
12
Others
Kainth (Pyrus pashia)
0
2
0
0
0
0
13
Others
Thira (Olea glandulifera)
0
4
0
0
0
0
14
Others
Chimu (Morus alba)
0
1
0
0
0
0
15
Others
Kachnar (Bauhinia variegate)
0
5
1
0
1
0
16
Others
Slambda (Lannea grandis)
0
1
1
0
0
0
17
Others
Beul (Grewia optiva)
0
0
1
0
0
0
18
Others
Galma (Broad leave)
0
1
0
0
0
0
19
Others
Haryan (Broad leave)
0
4
2
0
0
0
20
Others
Sapling
172
0
0
0
0
0
21
Bamboo
Bamboo Sticks
106
0
0
0
0
0
22
Others
Bkaar ( Broad leave)
0
1
0
1
0
0
23
Others
Sapling (Toona ciliata)
11
0
0
0
0
0
Total
289
66
25
6
2
1
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
389
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
Neither prescribed nor suggested
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
Rocky and vulnerable
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0.500
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Peacock, wild Boar, Monkey etc
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
113681
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
0.5408
Other
Jhungi
OD210
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
NPV
2
Comments of Chief Wild Life
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Mandi
86940
27598.40
552.0114
59
1221.566
18/11/2020
1122.40
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Suket
Mandi
DFO
Yes
One
28/10/2020
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Suket
Mandi
DFO
Recommended
The proposed alignment has been finalized, keeping in view the involvement of minimum forest land and involvement of minimum number of trees in the proposed alignment.
Mandi
CF
Recommended
Recommended for approval under FCA, 1980.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Recommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Himachal Pradesh
State Secretary
Recommended
06/03/2021
Recommended
State Govt. Officer
No Data
17.
Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional Office
Recommendation By
MoEF File No.
Date of Stage-I Clearance
Clearance Letter
Shimla
Regional Office
8B/HP/04/25/2021/FC
12/10/2021
23.
Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.
Date of Stage-II Clearance
Proposal Status
Clearance Letter
FP/HP/TRANS/49351/2020
Approved In-Principle
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×