PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
HP-0154/2016
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Himachal Pradesh
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Himachal Pradesh
(ii)
District :
Chamba
(iii)
Forest Division :
Dalhousie
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
1.5298
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
School
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Dalhousie
1.5298
Protected Forest
Total
1.5298
Division 1. : Dalhousie
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Chamba
1.5298
Total
1.5298
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
1.5298
0.03
Eco 5
Total.
1.5298
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Others
Chil (Pinus roxburghi)
0
0
1
2
0
0
2
Others
Broad leave
0
17
6
5
1
1
Total
0
17
7
7
1
1
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
33
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
Chil working circle
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
As the terrain is hilly,all possible preventive measures will have to be taken by the user agency for preventing the possibility of soil erosion.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0.0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
hare ,indian porcupine, wild boar, red jungle fowl, leopard, barking deer etc
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
879400
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
3.1
Man Massi DPF
Bhatiyat(Sihunta)
119/2, 137
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
justification
2
Revised part ii Recommendation
3
No Plantation Certificate
4
judgement Copy
5
Joint inspection report dated 16.03.2023
6
Enumeration list
7
NPV
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Chamba
652200
243700
268.232
54
463.0112
16/12/2016
319.7012
0.0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Dalhousie
Chamba
DFO
Yes
One
22/10/2016
Chamba
CF
Yes
One
22/12/2016
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Dalhousie
Chamba
DFO
Recommended
Thew requirement of forest land as proposed is unavoidable and the barest minimum. The college has been proposed to provide better education facility in the surrounding area. Moreover there is no higher education facility in Sihunta city and children from the local area have to travel long to get education facility. The proposed college building has been proposed in forest land as there is no other suitable non forest land available in the vicinity. Therefore, the construction of new building of
Chamba
CF
Recommended
Therequirement of forest land as proposed is unavoidable and the barest minimum. The college has been proposed to provide better education facility in the surrounding area. Moreover there is no higher education facility in Sihunta city and children from the local area have to travel long to get education facility. The proposed college building has been proposed in forest land as there is no other suitable non forest land available in the vicinity.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Himachal Pradesh
State Secretary
Recommended
08/03/2017
State Govt. Officer
No Data
17.
Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional Office
Recommendation By
MoEF File No.
Date of Stage-I Clearance
Clearance Letter
Shimla
Regional Office
8B/HP/09/30/2017
31/07/2024
18.
Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.
Application No.
Total Amount (Rs.)
Recieved Amount (Rs.)
Transaction Date
Transaction ID
Bank Name
Mode of Payment
Demmand Generated By User Agency
Demmand Verified By Nodal Officer
Uploaded Demand Letter
FP/HP/SCH/21873/2016
SCH218732016006
3,128,550.00
3,128,550.00
2024-11-02
HPSCH24307001500
Union Bank Of India
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
2024-10-28
2024-10-30
19.
Uploaded Status of Land to be transferred to Forest Department under FCA (Mutation Details) :
No
20.
Mutation Details Verified By Nodal Officer
Proposal No.
Verified Date
Mutation Letter
Remarks
FP/HP/SCH/21873/2016
22 Nov 2024
No Data
CA has been proposed over degraded Forest land, hence mutation is not required.
23.
Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.
Date of Stage-II Clearance
Proposal Status
Clearance Letter
FP/HP/SCH/21873/2016
Approved In-Principle
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×