PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : HP-03/2022
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Himachal Pradesh
 (i) State / Union Territory : Himachal Pradesh  (ii) District : Lahul and Spiti  (iii) Forest Division : Lahaul  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 6  (v)

Category of the Proposal: School
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Lahaul6UPF-III
Total 6
Division 1. : Lahaul
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Lahul and Spiti6
Total6
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
160.12Eco 6
Total. 6


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1OthersSanjal (Fraxinus xantoxyloides)347524000
2OthersRobinia11181876890
3OthersShur (Juniper)79141000
4OthersKashmal4000000
5OthersWillow (Salix)71514000
Total 474 199206 689 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 956


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : Plantation Working Plan
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : The land involoved is prone to Soil erosion and landslides and therefore necessary mitigatiion measures shall be taken as to avoid safety of land
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : Ibex Snow leopard, Brown Bear etc
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : Yes
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : NIL
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 119.20
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
1112.00DPF DulingPattan(Jalmah)C-I    View file
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
 (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 BILL OF COST OF TREES
2 MUCK MANAGEMENT PLAN
3 REVISED NPV BILL
4 CA Revised
5 EDS Reply raised by IRO
6 CL-16 (CA DETAIL)
7 CL-18 (LAND SUITABILITY CERTIFICATE BY DFO )
8 JOINT INSPECTION REPORT
9 Tree to be felled
10 Enumeration List
11 tree not to be felled
12 SIR Revised
13 Land Suitability Certificate
14 CA Bill revised

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Lahul and Spiti13835001013300350.582419512.980431/03/2022512.98040
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
 Nodal OfficerNoNo Data
LahaulKulluDFOYesOne09/03/2022
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
LahaulKulluDFO Recommendedjustified
KulluCF RecommendedThe proposal for diversion of 6 ha of forest land is justified and same is recommended under FCA, 1980 Yes
Nodal Officer RecommendedRecommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
Himachal PradeshState SecretaryRecommended09/01/2023RecommendedState Govt. OfficerNo Data