PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : HP-046/2018
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Himachal Pradesh
 (i) State / Union Territory : Himachal Pradesh  (ii) District : Shimla  (iii) Forest Division : Rohru  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 2.9934  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Road
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Rohru2.9934UPF, Andhra, UPf Jhanjwani, UPF Gyari
Total 2.9934
Division 1. : Rohru
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Shimla2.9934
Total2.9934
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
12.99340Eco 6
Total. 2.9934


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
NIL
5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : UPF Andhra, UPF Jhanwani, UPF Gyari, is prescribed for Tos, Chil, Kail working circle
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : The area is not eroded or is not much vulnerable to erosion
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0.150
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : The presence of wildlife is very meagre, but occasionally wild pheasants, common leopards, macaques venture in & around the area.
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : Yes
  (a)Details of violation(s): forest land has already been broken
   (b) Period of Work done(year) : 2014
   (c) Area of forest land involved in violation (in ha.) : 2.9934
S. No. Name of person responsible for violation Designation & Address of person responsible for violationAction taken against the person responsible for violation
1Violation Committee MembersDivisional Forest Officer Chairman Sub Divisional Magistrate Member Executive Engineer MemberThirty Five Lacs for breast wall and check wall and also for vegetative measures
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : No
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 749699
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
115.9868GewasKhashdhar84    View file
226.00UF JhanjwaniKhashdhar53E/15    View file
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
 (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 Certificate w.r.t. Alternative sites examine
2 Land suitability certificate
3 check list 19 certificate regarding violation report
4 check list 20 certificate regarding non availability of non forest land for compensatory afforestation
5 Bill of NPV
6 Revised Penal CA Scheme
7 trees list
8 Revised Part II
9 Certificate of WL Sanctuary/ ECO sensitive zones
10 Penal CA Toposheet
11 Penal CA Map

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Shimla17070581763.99240.241870509.063931/03/2017341.03870
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
RohruShimlaDFOYesOne12/01/2018
 Nodal OfficerNoNo Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
RohruShimlaDFO Recommended
ShimlaCF RecommendedProposal is beneficial to the local people of the area and is in the interest of State. Hence, recommended for approval under FCA, 1980.Yes
Nodal Officer Recommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
Himachal PradeshState SecretaryRecommended30/07/2018 Recommended State Govt. OfficerNo Data
17. Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional OfficeRecommendation ByMoEF File No.Date of Stage-I ClearanceClearance Letter
ShimlaRegional Office8B/HP/06/53/2018/FC18/12/2018
18. Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.Application No.Total Amount (Rs.)Recieved Amount (Rs.)Transaction DateTransaction IDBank NameMode of PaymentDemmand Generated By User AgencyDemmand Verified By Nodal OfficerUploaded Demand Letter
FP/HP/ROAD/8753/2014ROAD875320147346,797,453.006,797,450.00Union Bank Of IndiaNEFT/RTGS (Challan)19/03/202519/03/2025
23. Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.Date of Stage-II ClearanceProposal StatusClearance Letter
FP/HP/ROAD/8753/2014Approved In-PrincipleNo Data