PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
HP-028/2015
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Himachal Pradesh
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Himachal Pradesh
(ii)
District :
Shimla
(iii)
Forest Division :
Shimla(shimla)
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
5.6581
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Road
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Shimla(shimla)
5.6581
R-18 Poabo, R-19 Dumi and GCL Sanog,GCL Jholo & GCL Shida.
Total
5.6581
Division 1. : Shimla(shimla)
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Shimla
5.6581
Total
5.6581
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
5.6581
0.2
Eco 6
Total.
5.6581
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Others
Deodar (Cidrus deodara)
97
83
68
87
62
20
2
Others
B.L
127
15
6
3
0
0
3
Others
Ban (Quercus leucotrichophora)
174
328
60
2
1
0
4
Others
Kail (Pinus Walichaina)
2
3
2
0
0
0
5
Others
Chil (Pinus roxburghaii)
16
36
23
17
14
4
Total
416
465
159
109
77
24
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
1250
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
R-18 Poabo and R-19 Dumi has been prescribed Deodar -Kail working circle as per working plan.
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
Slighty vulnerable to erosion.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0.5
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
N.A.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
NIL
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
2658396
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
11.5
Pander C-69 B
Dodrakwar
Pander C-69 B
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Site Inspection Report
2
EDS reply
3
Revised Joint Inspection report
4
Abstract of trees
5
Check List No 6
6
Check list No 19
7
Certificate regarding Non availability of non forest land for CA
8
NPV bill
9
Revised part II (Recommendation)
10
EDS reply
11
EDS Reply
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Shimla
69158.34
32198.34
301.7008
133
551.3658
31/03/2016
517.06
4.79
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Shimla(shimla)
Shimla
DFO
Yes
One
27/10/2016
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Shimla(shimla)
Shimla
DFO
Not-Recommended
Not Recommended.
Shimla
CF
Recommended
No doubt that the village Dumi and Karechi are connected with the roads but the instant alignment will curtail the distance almost thereof and will also connect the left out beneficiaries. Therefore, the proposal is beneficial to the local people of the area and is in the interest of State. Hence, recommended for approval under FCA, 1980.
No
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Himachal Pradesh
State Secretary
Recommended
18/05/2017
Recommended
State Govt. Officer
No Data
17.
Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional Office
Recommendation By
MoEF File No.
Date of Stage-I Clearance
Clearance Letter
Shimla
Regional Office
8B/HP/06/56/2017/FC
20/04/2021
18.
Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.
Application No.
Total Amount (Rs.)
Recieved Amount (Rs.)
Transaction Date
Transaction ID
Bank Name
Mode of Payment
Demmand Generated By User Agency
Demmand Verified By Nodal Officer
Uploaded Demand Letter
FP/HP/ROAD/8164/2014
ROAD81642014346
6,743,757.00
6,743,757.00
2021-08-09
SBIN121221360567
Union Bank Of India
NEFT/RTGS (Challan)
2021-08-04
2021-08-07
19.
Uploaded Status of Land to be transferred to Forest Department under FCA (Mutation Details).
(i). Whether CA Land is mandatorily required in this Proposal :
Yes
(ii). Total Land identified for raising CA:
11.5
(iii). No. of Maintenance years:
10
(iv). Total No. of Patches/Parcel:
1
No. of patches :
1
Patch wise details
Patch No.
Shape of land identified for CA
Area of Patch/Parcel(in ha.)
1
Block(Polygon)
11.5
Status of CA Land so identified :
Forest Area
Site Name :
Pander C-69 B Dodrakwar
Location Details :
Pander C-69 B Dodrakwar
Uploaded GPS File :
Uploaded Scanned copy of Map :
Status of CA Land so identified
Name of Forest.
Legal Status of Forest Land
Pander C-69 B
Others
20.
Mutation Details Verified By Nodal Officer
Proposal No.
Verified Date
Mutation Letter
Remarks
FP/HP/ROAD/8164/2014
06 Sep 2021
No Data
CA has been proposed over degraded Forest land, hence mutation is not required.
23.
Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.
Date of Stage-II Clearance
Proposal Status
Clearance Letter
FP/HP/ROAD/8164/2014
Approved In-Principle
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×