PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
HP-0229/2021
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Himachal Pradesh
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Himachal Pradesh
(ii)
District :
Mandi
(iii)
Forest Division :
Suket
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
10.6019
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Road
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Suket
10.6019
DPF, CVD, & OTHERS
Total
10.6019
Division 1. : Suket
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Mandi
10.6019
Total
10.6019
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
10.6019
0.1
Eco 5
Total.
10.6019
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Others
Pula( Pula croatia)
0
2
2
0
0
0
2
Melotus Philippensis
Kambhal
0
102
5
2
0
0
3
Others
Kachnar (Vahuinia variegata)
0
10
2
0
0
0
4
Others
Shaama (Vateria indica)
0
96
75
16
0
0
5
Others
Parera (Erythrina parera)
0
0
1
0
0
0
6
Others
Trimbal (Ficus carica)
0
9
13
5
0
0
7
Others
Kakarsingi (Pistacia integrrrima)
0
1
0
0
0
0
8
Others
Slambda (Lennea coromandelica)
0
9
2
0
1
0
9
Others
Chuli (Prunus armeniaca)
0
2
1
0
1
0
10
Others
Chill (Pinus roxburghii)
0
33
39
11
2
0
11
Others
Galma
0
1
0
0
0
0
12
Others
Shegal (Pyrus pashia)
0
8
2
0
0
0
13
Ficus Racemosa
Feguda
0
5
0
0
0
0
14
Others
Ban (Quercus leucotrichophora)
0
57
37
13
8
10
15
Others
Bhadrol (Machilus thunbergii)
0
0
0
1
2
0
16
Others
Deodar (Cedrus deodara)
0
1
1
1
0
0
17
Others
Buransh (Rhododendron aroreum)
0
13
16
2
0
0
18
Others
Kagshi
0
0
2
2
0
1
19
Others
Eiun
0
9
8
4
2
2
20
Others
Kaluchha ( Quercus chrysolepis)
0
0
0
1
0
0
21
Others
Kafal (Myrica esculenta)
0
3
0
0
0
0
22
Others
Kail (Pinus wallachiana)
0
2
2
0
0
0
Total
0
363
208
58
16
13
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
658
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
Plantation working Circle, Protection working circle
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
Rocky and vulnerable
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0.750
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Monkey, leopard, fox, etc
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
Yes
(a)Details of violation(s):
Not known
(b) Period of Work done(year) :
NIL
(c) Area of forest land involved in violation (in ha.) :
0.6840
S. No.
Name of person responsible for violation
Designation & Address of person responsible for violation
Action taken against the person responsible for violation
1
Local people Panchayat
Not known
Not known
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
No
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
4423172
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
21.2038
DPF
Kangoo
A/53/15
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
NPV
2
PENAL NPV
3
EDS reply along with revised NPV ETC
4
Affidavits
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Mandi
86940
27598.40
557.4358
62
1229.728
25/11/2021
1122.404
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Suket
Mandi
DFO
Yes
Two
01/02/2021,25/11/2021
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Suket
Mandi
DFO
Recommended
The land is required for development work and connect the rural villages for transportation.
Mandi
CF
Recommended
Recommended for approval under FCA, 1980.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Recommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Himachal Pradesh
State Secretary
Recommended
06/01/2025
Recommended
State Govt. Officer
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×