PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : HP-04/2020
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Himachal Pradesh
 (i) State / Union Territory : Himachal Pradesh  (ii) District : Mandi  (iii) Forest Division : Mandi,Suket  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 2.2876  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Road
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Suket0.6337UF & UPF
2Mandi1.6539Unclassed Forests
Total 2.2876
Division 1. : Mandi
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Mandi1.6539
Total1.6539
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
11.65390.01Eco 5
Total. 1.6539


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Populus sppPopular032000
2OthersKakre (Puistacia integerra)100000
3OthersMarinu ( Helinus lanceplatus)210000
4EucalyptusSafeda010000
5OthersTun (Toona ciliata)110000
Total 4 62 00 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 12


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : There is no prescription for this forest in the working plan.
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : Not vulnerable to soil erosion.
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0.500
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : monkey, bore, peacock etc.
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : No
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 1527675
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
114.58Dobha DPFPanarsaDobha DPF Block Aut Beat Khini    View file
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
 (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 Guidelines
2 justification
3 Net Present Value
4 certificate of approximate distance.
5 Reclamation plan
6 certificate of eco/sensitive zone
7 Revise NPV
8 Revised Part-II
9 EDS raised by GoI dated/16.12.2023
10 Soil & Moisture Conservation Plan undertaking
11 EDS reply dated 20.07.2023
12 Reply of EDS dated 06.05.2024
13 Reply of eds dated 06.06.2024
Division 2. : Suket
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Mandi0.6337
Total0.6337
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
10.63370.19Eco 5
Total. 0.6337


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1OthersChil(Pinus roxburghii)026591950
2OthersBan (Quercus loucotrichphora)0124000
3OthersOie (Pronus armeniaca)030000
Total 0 4163 195 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 128


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : Neither prescribed nor suggested
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : Not vulnerable to soil erosion
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0.500
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : Leopard, Fox, Ape, Bear etc
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : No
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : No
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 1458505
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
NO Data
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
 (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 Revised NPV
2 Revised enumeration list of trees

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Mandi85110.0533663375.254668562.003431/03/2019533.9680
2Mandi8694027598.40552.0114591221.56618/05/20201122.400
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
MandiMandiDFOYesOne04/01/2020
SuketMandiDFOYesOne01/02/2020
 Nodal OfficerNoNo Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
MandiMandiDFO RecommendedThe proposal is recommended for granting approval under FCA, 1980
SuketMandiDFO RecommendedThe proposed alignment for the said road has been carefully finalized after considering a total No of three alternate alignment in all the cases a portion of the road shall pass through the forest area.
MandiCF RecommendedBeing developmental activity, the proposal is recommended for approval under FCA, 1980.Yes
Nodal Officer RecommendedRecommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
Himachal PradeshState SecretaryRecommended19/03/2021 Recommended State Govt. OfficerNo Data
17. Stage-I Clearance Report
Regional OfficeRecommendation ByMoEF File No.Date of Stage-I ClearanceClearance Letter
ShimlaRegional Office8B/HP/06/37/2021/FC09/10/2024
18. Payment made by User Agency
Proposal No.Application No.Total Amount (Rs.)Recieved Amount (Rs.)Transaction DateTransaction IDBank NameMode of PaymentDemmand Generated By User AgencyDemmand Verified By Nodal OfficerUploaded Demand Letter
FP/HP/ROAD/42526/2019ROAD4252620199334,386,748.00Union Bank Of IndiaNEFT/RTGS (Challan)2024-11-202024-11-20
23. Stage-II Clearance Details
Proposal No.Date of Stage-II ClearanceProposal StatusClearance Letter
FP/HP/ROAD/42526/2019Approved In-PrincipleNo Data