PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
HP-0132/2019
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Himachal Pradesh
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Himachal Pradesh
(ii)
District :
Mandi
(iii)
Forest Division :
Karsog,Suket
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
33.3292
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Road
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Karsog
0.959
Protected Forest
2
Suket
32.3702
DPF, UPF, CVD, Other
Total
33.3292
Division 1. : Karsog
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(in ha.)
NIL
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
0.959
0
Eco 5
Total.
0.959
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Others
No trees existing in the alignment
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
0
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
Protection Working Cricle
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
Vegetative, Construction of dry check dam and brush wood check dam bill has been raised to user agency
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0.100
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Monkey, Fox, crow, parrot
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
No
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
128.49
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
5
D-72 Restadhar
Pangna
C-III
View file
2
2
10
D-235 Dhurmu
Seri
C-IIb
View file
3
3
10
D-240 Behal
Seri
C-Ia
View file
4
4
5
D- 252 Naga Nal
Seri
C- Ia
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Distance certificate from Wild Life Sanctuary
2
Bill of NPV
3
No trees certificate
4
Certification regarding rare/endangered/unique species present
Division 2. : Suket
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Mandi
33.3292
Total
33.3292
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
32.3702
0.0074
Eco 5
Total.
32.3702
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Others
Kakkarsinghi (Pistacia Integerrima)
0
1
1
1
1
0
2
Cassia Fistula
Amaltash
20
7
1
0
0
0
3
Others
Sanan(Oogenia)
6
2
1
0
0
0
4
Others
Salmbada(Lannea Coromandelica)
23
28
4
2
0
0
5
Others
Parera(Erythrina Parera)
0
2
0
0
0
0
6
Melotus Philippensis
Kambhal
6
2
0
0
0
0
7
Others
Dhaw (Vernicia Fordii)
20
20
0
0
0
0
8
Acacia Catechu
Khair
10
1
0
0
0
0
9
Others
Trayambl (Ficus Roxburghii)
1
0
0
0
0
0
10
Terminalia bellerica
Bahera
1
5
0
1
0
0
11
Couroupita Guianensis
Dudhala
0
1
0
0
0
0
12
Others
Dhai (anogeissus latifolia)
1
2
0
0
0
0
13
Pine
Chil
3
2
0
0
0
0
14
Ficus Bengalensis
Bargad
0
0
0
0
0
2
15
Others
Pula (Pula croatia)
1
0
0
0
0
0
16
Aegle Marmelos
Bael
1
0
0
0
0
0
Total
93
73
7
4
1
2
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
180
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
Neither prescribed nor suggested
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
The user agency has been given an undertaking that the bioengineering measure will be taken and R/walls and & B/walls be const. for avoiding for landslides
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0.0
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
Leopard, Fox, Monkey antelope etc
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
No
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
No
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
23171068
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
3
10.00
DPF
Kangoo
DPF Aien Sunali
View file
2
5
10.00
DPF
Kangoo
DPF Patta
View file
3
2
10
PF
Kangoo
ND286
View file
4
1
7
PF
Kangoo
OD210
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
Comments of CWLW
2
Part-II ( Suket Division0
3
Penal NPV
4
Point No. 17 & 18 supportive documents
5
Revised enumeration list of trees 180 Nos.
6
Self speaking report of DFO Suket regarding flora & Fauna
7
Copy of denotificationof PA
8
Copy of arial distance & comments of CWLW
9
Revised NPV
10
observation dated 05.0802024
11
REPLY EDS DATED 22.10.2024
12
undertaking for monitoring of muck management plan
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Mandi
66354
48407
149.401
18
298.302
31/03/2020
296.228
0
2
Mandi
86940
27598.40
552.0114
59
1221.566
11/08/2020
1122.404
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Karsog
Mandi
DFO
Yes
One
29/07/2020
Suket
Mandi
DFO
Yes
One
10/08/2020
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Karsog
Mandi
DFO
Recommended
The proposed road will reduce 40 Kms. distance approximately from Tattapani to District Headquarter Mandi and will be beneficial to the people of the Tattapani, Thalli, Shakra, Sahaj, Sawindhar and Alsindi Panchayats to fetch their cash crop to market for getting good price of their produce to increase their economy and furnish their day to day work relating to District headquarter also. So the proposed forest land in respect of Karsog Forest Division for the purpose is submitted/ rocommanded for approval please.
Suket
Mandi
DFO
Recommended
The area required for diversion is minimum with minimum number of trees standing on the proposed road in Suket Forest Division.
Mandi
CF
Recommended
Being developmental activity the case is recommended for diversion under FCA, 1980.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Recommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Himachal Pradesh
State Secretary
Recommended
19/10/2020
State Govt. Officer
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×