PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : HP-0123/2018
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Himachal Pradesh
 (i) State / Union Territory : Himachal Pradesh  (ii) District : Bilaspur  (iii) Forest Division : Bilaspur  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 1.8945  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Road
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Bilaspur1.8945Un-Protected Forest (UPF) (Charand Jungle Dehati)
Total 1.8945
Division 1. : Bilaspur
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Bilaspur1.8945
Total1.8945
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
11.89450.02Eco 5
Total. 1.8945


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1Psidium GuajavaAmrood010000
2Rhus Spp.Rubinia110000
3Mangifera IndicaAam020000
4Grewia TiliaefoliaBeul750000
5OthersSlambra (lannea coromandelica)121000
6Melotus PhilippensisKamal110000
7Bauhinia ParvifloraKachnar035100
8EucalyptusSafeda001000
9Bombax CeibaSimal001000
10OthersChil (Pinus roxburghii)001100
11Melia AzadirachtaDrek100000
12OthersBeri (Zizphus oenoplia (L) Mill)100000
Total 12 159 20 0
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 38


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : The proposed forest land is prescribed under Planting Working circle.
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : No danger to erosion in the area as the soil strata is rocky in the area
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0.1
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : Wild Boar, Rabbit, Barking dear, Jackal, Monkey, Porcupine etc.
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : Yes
  (a)Details of violation(s): As per note on violation attached in proposal fold
   (b) Period of Work done(year) : 1996
   (c) Area of forest land involved in violation (in ha.) : 1.0481
S. No. Name of person responsible for violation Designation & Address of person responsible for violationAction taken against the person responsible for violation
1Local people and PanchayatLocal people and PanchayatAs per note on violation
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : No
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 975695
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
113.78C-5 ChabSwarghatC-5    View file

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 Reclamation plan of muck dumping sites
2 NPV Bill
3 Penal NPV
4 CA Scheme
5 Note on violation
6 Certificate for location map
7 Undertaking

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Bilaspur11670042800772.6072801724.42502/03/20211454.01550
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
BilaspurBilaspurDFOYesOne18/07/2020
 Nodal OfficerNoNo Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
BilaspurBilaspurDFO RecommendedThe forest land proposed for diversion under FCA, 1980 is unavoidable and barest minimum, as such recommended
BilaspurCF RecommendedThe forest land proposed for the diversion is unavoidable and barest minimum hence, recommended.Yes
Nodal Officer RecommendedRecommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
Himachal PradeshState SecretaryRecommended05/08/2022RecommendedState Govt. OfficerNo Data