PART-II
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal : HP-0147/2019
1. Location of the project/Scheme : Himachal Pradesh
 (i) State / Union Territory : Himachal Pradesh  (ii) District : Solan  (iii) Forest Division : Solan  (iv) Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) : 4.7  (v)

Category of the Proposal: Road
2. Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No. DivisionForest Land(ha.)Legal Status
1Solan4.7Protected Forest
Total 4.7
Division 1. : Solan
3. District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No. DistrictArea(ha.)
1Solan4.7
Total4.7
4. Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i) Density of vegetation
S. No. Area(in ha.)Density Eco-Class
14.70.5Eco 5
Total. 4.7


(ii) Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No. Scientific Name Local Name (0-30)cm. (31-60)cm. (61-90)cm. (91-120)cm. (121-150)cm. (>150)cm.
1OthersChil (Pinus Roxburgai)1205118451
2OthersDeodar (Cedrus Deodara)715300
Total 127 5223 75 1
Sub Total (No of Trees.) 215


5. Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion : Chil working plant circle
6. Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion : There is less possibility of erosion of forest land by the construction of proposed project.
7. Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) : 0.80
8. Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
 (i). Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion : Deer, Leopard, Monkey, Langur, Porcupine, peacock, Kakar etc.
 (ii). Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. : No
 (iii). Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ): No
 (iv). Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion : No
 (v). Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area : No
9. Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
 (i). Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area : No
10. Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
 (i). Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project : Yes
11. Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
 (i). Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out : Yes
  (a)Details of violation(s): Constructed by Local Public
   (b) Period of Work done(year) : 20
   (c) Area of forest land involved in violation (in ha.) : 1.85
S. No. Name of person responsible for violation Designation & Address of person responsible for violationAction taken against the person responsible for violation
1Local VillagersLocal Villagers of Village Kiari to KhinnaThe work was stopped
2Local Public Local Public of the areanil
12. Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) : No
13. Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i). Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs): 2577807
Patch Wise Details
S.no Patch No.Area(ha.)Name of PF/RFRangeCompartment NoUploaded KML file of patch
119.40UPFChailnil    View file
(ii). Copy of CA scheme details: (iii). Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station: (iv). Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
 (V). Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :

Additional information Details
S. No. DocumentsRemarks
1 image file
2 Gramin Revenue Officer report
3 Check list serial number 16
4 Check list no 17
5 Tecnichal detail
6 letter alongwith all observation raised by IRO dated 10.8.2022.
7 Recommendation by DFO
8 Form no 15 site inspection report
9 Statement showing details of Forest area proposed for diversion
10 Statement showing details of Non forest area in the proposal.
11 Joint committee report
12 Wildlife conservation plan
13 Recommendation leter of CWLW has been uploaded
14 Enumeration list alongwith date
15 Eco Sensitive Zone of Chail Wildlife Sanctuary
16 List of unbroken land
17 Panalty of the road under violation and observation no. 1 (Penal CA)
18 Part-II
19 Revised NPV and observation no. 11
20 Reply of observation raised by Nodal officer dated 27.04.2024.
21 Eco-Sensitive Zone certificate
22 Forwarded letter dated 28.3.2024

14. District Profile
S.no District NameGeographical area of the district (in ha.)Forest area of the district (in ha.)Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)No. of Approved CasesForest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)A) Forest land (in ha.)B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1Solan19360057191223.7254887.684811/02/2021887.68480
15. Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division NameCircleSite inspected ByWhether site inspectedNo. of times site visited Site inspection reportDate of visit
SolanSolanDFOYesOne16/12/2019
 Nodal OfficerNoNo Data
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16. Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
DivisionCircleRecommendation ByRecommendationReasonLetter Whether CF agreed
SolanSolanDFO RecommendedThe proposal is recommended for diversion of forest land because the road will benefit large number of population of the specific area
SolanCF RecommendedThe road is justified as it will benefit large population in the villages to be connected.Yes
Nodal Officer RecommendedRecommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17. Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
StateRecommendation ByRecommendationRecommendation DateRemarksSigning AuthorityNotificationRecommendation Letter
Himachal PradeshState SecretaryRecommended19/07/2022RECOMMENDEDState Govt. OfficerNo Data