PART-II
Form for seeking prior approval of Central Government under section 2 of the Forest(Conservation) Act,1980 for Diversion of fresh forest area
(To be filled by the concerned Deputy Conservator of Forest)
State Serial No. of proposal :
HP-0174/2017
1.
Location of the project/Scheme :
Himachal Pradesh
(i)
State / Union Territory :
Himachal Pradesh
(ii)
District :
Bilaspur
(iii)
Forest Division :
Bilaspur
(iv)
Area of forest land proposed for diversion (in ha.) :
3.9654
(v)
Category of the Proposal:
Road
2.
Legal status of forest land proposed for diversion
S. No.
Division
Forest Land(ha.)
Legal Status
1
Bilaspur
3.9654
Undemarcated Protected Forest
Total
3.9654
Division 1. : Bilaspur
3.
District wise area to be diverted in the division
S. No.
District
Area(ha.)
1
Bilaspur
3.9654
Total
3.9654
4.
Details of Vegetation available in the forest land proposed for diversion
(i)
Density of vegetation
S. No.
Area(in ha.)
Density
Eco-Class
1
3.9654
0.06
Eco 5
Total.
3.9654
(ii)
Species-wise local/scientific names and girth-wise enumeration of trees at FRL
S. No.
Scientific Name
Local Name
(0-30)cm.
(31-60)cm.
(61-90)cm.
(91-120)cm.
(121-150)cm.
(>150)cm.
1
Cassia Fistula
Amaltas
0
8
9
0
0
0
2
Others
Beul (Gravia optiva)
0
2
1
0
0
0
3
Others
Amla (Phyllanthus emblica)
0
1
0
0
0
0
4
Others
Barnah (Feronia Limonia)
0
1
0
0
0
0
5
Aegle Marmelos
Bill
0
0
1
0
0
0
6
Others
Chamror(Ehretia laevis)
0
0
2
0
0
0
7
Others
Chhal (Anogeissus latifolia)
0
4
3
0
1
0
8
Others
Kamal (Mallotus philippiensis)
0
12
16
5
1
0
9
Others
Dakanan( Diospyfos cordifolia)
0
0
0
1
0
0
10
Others
Kangu (Flacourtia xylosma)
0
1
1
0
0
0
11
Others
Salambra(Lannea coromandelia)
0
1
4
2
2
0
12
Others
Rusina(Lasunia spp)
0
11
8
0
0
0
13
Mangifera Indica
Mango
0
0
0
1
0
0
14
Acacia Catechu
Khair
0
11
6
0
0
0
15
Others
Tun (Sedrella Toona)
0
3
2
0
0
0
16
Others
Jaapani Toot (Morus papyrifera)
0
0
1
0
0
0
17
Others
Kachnar(Bauhinia varigata)
0
1
0
0
0
0
18
Others
Kalam(Mitragyna parvifolia)
0
0
1
0
0
1
19
Others
Kali Chhal (Diospyros montana)
0
1
0
1
0
0
20
Acacia leucophloea
Reur
0
0
1
0
0
1
21
Others
Tiamli(Ficus roxburghii
0
0
1
0
0
0
22
Albezzia Labbeck
Sirs
0
0
1
0
0
0
23
Others
Simbal(Salmalia malabarica)
0
0
0
1
0
1
24
Syzigium Cumini
Jamun
0
3
1
0
1
1
25
Others
Retaila (Wendlendia exserta)
0
16
3
0
0
0
26
Others
Shisham (Dalbergia Sissoo)
0
14
10
1
0
0
27
Mangifera Indica
Mango
0
0
0
1
0
0
28
Bamboo
Bamboo
10
0
0
0
0
0
Total
10
90
72
13
5
4
Sub Total (No of Trees.)
194
5.
Working plan prescription for the forest land proposed for diversion :
NO prescription for diversion of forest land for non forestry purpose has been made in working plan
6.
Brief note on vulnerability of the forest area to erosion :
No danger to erosion in the area as the soil starta is rocky in the area.
7.
Approximate distance of the proposed site for diversion from boundary of forest(in km.) :
0.800
8.
Significance of the forest land proposed for diversion from wildlife point of view
(i).
Details of wildlife present in and around the forest land proposed for diversion :
wild boar, monkey,crow,sparrows, peacock ,Jackals ets.
(ii).
Whether forms part of national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve,tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc. :
No
(iii).
Whether the forest land proposed for diversion is located within eco-sensitive zone(ESZ) of the Protected Area notified under Wildlife(Protection) Act,1972 (Note: In case, ESZ of a Protected Area is not notified,then,10kms distance from boundary of the Protected Area should be treated as ESZ):
No
(iv).
Whether any national park, wildlife sanctuary, biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant corridor, wildlife migration corridor etc., is located within 1 Km. from boundary of the forest land proposed for diversion :
No
(v).
Whether any rare/endangered/unique species of flora and fauna found in the area :
No
9.
Details of any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument located in the area, if any
(i).
Whether any protected archaeological/heritage site/defence establishment or any other important monument is located in the area :
No
10.
Comment as to the reasonability of the extent of the forest land proposed for diversion
(i).
Whether the requirement of forest land as proposed by the user agency is unavoidable and bare minimum for the project :
Yes
11.
Details of violation(s), if any ,committed
(i).
Whether any work in violation of the Act or guidelines issued under the Act has been carried out :
Yes
(a)Details of violation(s):
No Data
(b) Period of Work done(year) :
2000
(c) Area of forest land involved in violation (in ha.) :
1.49
S. No.
Name of person responsible for violation
Designation & Address of person responsible for violation
Action taken against the person responsible for violation
1
Local Pepole and Panchayat
Local Pepole and Panchayat
Bill has been raised to user agency
12.
Whether work in violation is still in progres(Yes/No) :
No
13.
Details of compensatory afforestation scheme
Patch wise details for Degraded Area (To be earmarked by DFO)
(i).
Total Financial Outlay for C.A(lacs):
2307890
Patch Wise Details
S.no
Patch No.
Area(ha.)
Name of PF/RF
Range
Compartment No
Uploaded KML file of patch
1
1
7.94
UPF Dhango
Ghumarwin
H43E15
View file
(ii).
Copy of CA scheme details:
(iii).
Scanned copy of the Geo-referenced map of the forest land proposed for C.A. prepared by using DGPS or Total Station:
(iv).
Copy of Survey of India Toposheet indicating boundary of forest land proposed for C.A.:
(V).
Copy of NOC from Competent Authority :
Additional information Details
S. No.
Documents
Remarks
1
CA Scheme
2
aerial distance
3
Location Map
4
Muck Dumping Plan
5
Recommendation of DCF
6
Land Suitability certificate
7
Penal NPV
8
Site inspection of CA area
9
revised enumeration list and abstract
10
Notification 23.10.1999
11
Notification dated 07.06.2013
12
orders
14.
District Profile
S.no
District Name
Geographical area of the district (in ha.)
Forest area of the district (in ha.)
Total forest area diverted since 1980 (in ha.)
No. of Approved Cases
Forest Land including penal C.A. (in ha.)
Progress of compensatory afforestation as on(date)
A) Forest land (in ha.)
B) Non-forest land (in ha.)
1
Bilaspur
116700
42800
772.6072
80
1724.425
31/03/2021
1454.0155
0
15.
Site inspection report of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer highlighting important facts pertaining to the forest land
Division Name
Circle
Site inspected By
Whether site inspected
No. of times site visited
Site inspection report
Date of visit
Bilaspur
CF
Yes
One
31/01/2019
Nodal Officer
No
No Data
Bilaspur
Bilaspur
DFO
Yes
One
20/10/2018
(Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer with(Part II,III & Part IV))
16.
Specific recommendation of the DFO/CCF/Nodal Officer for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason
Division
Circle
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Reason
Letter
Whether CF agreed
Bilaspur
Bilaspur
DFO
Recommended
The land proposed for diversion is unavoidable barest minimum, hence recommended
Bilaspur
CF
Recommended
Land requirement is minimum and unavoidable.
Yes
Nodal Officer
Recommended
Recommended
Specific recommendation of the State Government(Part V)
17.
Specific recommendation of the State Government for acceptance or otherwise of the proposal with reason ( Part V)
State
Recommendation By
Recommendation
Recommendation Date
Remarks
Signing Authority
Notification
Recommendation Letter
Himachal Pradesh
State Secretary
Recommended
27/12/2019
Recommended
State Govt. Officer
No Data
Print
Checklist for State Nodal Officer
×